Discussion Forum: Thread 346603 |
|
|
| | Author: | wyvern | Posted: | Sep 14, 2023 08:09 | Subject: | Projectile questions | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
|
| Why is this part under the Bar category:
but this very similar one is (rightfully so) under Projectile Launcher?
Meanwhile both of their respective bricks are under Projectile Launcher:
Also, how come there aren't relationships that match projectiles with their
compatible launchers, and vice versa? I feel like that would be useful.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Sep 14, 2023 11:50 | Subject: | Re: Projectile questions | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, wyvern writes:
| Why is this part under the Bar category:
but this very similar one is (rightfully so) under Projectile Launcher?
Meanwhile both of their respective bricks are under Projectile Launcher:
Also, how come there aren't relationships that match projectiles with their
compatible launchers, and vice versa? I feel like that would be useful.
|
Everything you said makes 100% sense. 61680 should be moved to the Projectile
category, and projectiles + compatible launchers relationships should be added.
David
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Dec 2, 2023 09:44 | Subject: | Re: Projectile questions | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, wyvern writes:
| Why is this part under the Bar category:
but this very similar one is (rightfully so) under Projectile Launcher?
|
This has been completed in accordance with
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2599
| Meanwhile both of their respective bricks are under Projectile Launcher:
Also, how come there aren't relationships that match projectiles with their
compatible launchers, and vice versa? I feel like that would be useful.
|
To have a relationship like that, we would need to have two separate categories
for the projectiles and the projectile launchers similar to having two separate
categories for tires and wheels. This is something that can be discussed and
would only occur during a major catalog move cycle.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Dec 2, 2023 13:31 | Subject: | Re: Projectile questions | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| In Catalog Requests, wyvern writes:
| Why is this part under the Bar category:
but this very similar one is (rightfully so) under Projectile Launcher?
|
This has been completed in accordance with
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2599
| Meanwhile both of their respective bricks are under Projectile Launcher:
Also, how come there aren't relationships that match projectiles with their
compatible launchers, and vice versa? I feel like that would be useful.
|
To have a relationship like that, we would need to have two separate categories
for the projectiles and the projectile launchers similar to having two separate
categories for tires and wheels. This is something that can be discussed and
would only occur during a major catalog move cycle.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Shouldn't Parts that Belong Together work?
It says:
This Item fits with and is usually used with the following Item(s):
It is even used in two parts of the previous example:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRelList.asp?relID=21&catID=992
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Dec 2, 2023 13:46 | Subject: | Re: Projectile questions | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| In Catalog Requests, wyvern writes:
| Why is this part under the Bar category:
but this very similar one is (rightfully so) under Projectile Launcher?
|
This has been completed in accordance with
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2599
| Meanwhile both of their respective bricks are under Projectile Launcher:
Also, how come there aren't relationships that match projectiles with their
compatible launchers, and vice versa? I feel like that would be useful.
|
To have a relationship like that, we would need to have two separate categories
for the projectiles and the projectile launchers similar to having two separate
categories for tires and wheels. This is something that can be discussed and
would only occur during a major catalog move cycle.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Shouldn't Parts that Belong Together work?
It says:
This Item fits with and is usually used with the following Item(s):
It is even used in two parts of the previous example:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRelList.asp?relID=21&catID=992
|
"Parts that Belong Together" is a flat 1:1 relationship, so it only makes
sense on items that only work with one other item and nothing else. It can't
do many:many. To do this properly, we would need a many:many relationship because
multiple projectiles can be used with multiple launchers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|