Discussion Forum: Thread 342359 |
|
|
| | Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Jul 4, 2023 15:43 | Subject: | Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 77 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jul 4, 2023 15:51 | Subject: | Re: Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
It is part of the original set packaging, so I would say no.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | ghyde | Posted: | Jul 5, 2023 03:43 | Subject: | Re: Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
It is part of the original set packaging, so I would say no.
Cheers,
Randy
|
If it was found to be common for this to be floating around inside the box, it
might warrant a note on the box entry. If it is not common, it's not really
worth the bother. Due to the age of the set, being from 2004, it's unlikely
that we'll ever know for sure if this was a common issue or not. Therefore
I'd agree with not adding it to the catalog.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jul 5, 2023 05:26 | Subject: | Re: Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Jul 5, 2023 06:47 | Subject: | Re: Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
So, on the one hand we have a prior precedent, and the other we have one no vote
and one doubtful. For the record, I have seen a number of these (from the Alpha
Team series that used them) having come detached from the boxes. They were glued
to the inside surface and nothing held them securely beyond the glue. Time, humidity,
and bumping into the boxes has detached (possibly half) of the remaining sets
from that series.
Other sellers, who still have these, please chime in with the situation of your
inventory.
Thanks to axaday for pointing out that it is a lenticular and not a hologram.
Nita Rae
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jul 5, 2023 12:27 | Subject: | Re: Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
So, on the one hand we have a prior precedent, and the other we have one no vote
and one doubtful. For the record, I have seen a number of these (from the Alpha
Team series that used them) having come detached from the boxes. They were glued
to the inside surface and nothing held them securely beyond the glue. Time, humidity,
and bumping into the boxes has detached (possibly half) of the remaining sets
from that series.
Other sellers, who still have these, please chime in with the situation of your
inventory.
Thanks to axaday for pointing out that it is a lenticular and not a hologram.
Nita Rae
|
Precedent is good enough for me. You can submit it to the catalog if you would
like to, Nita Rae.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Jul 5, 2023 12:29 | Subject: | Re: Should box hologram be in catalog ? | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Several days back I parted out a few copies of 4748-1. In both cases the hologram,
which is normally affixed to the inside of the box lid, was floating around inside
the box. Along one edge it has a 7-digit element number ( 4242758 ). Is this
an appropriate item to add to the catalog ?
Thanks, Nita Rae
|
|
So, on the one hand we have a prior precedent, and the other we have one no vote
and one doubtful. For the record, I have seen a number of these (from the Alpha
Team series that used them) having come detached from the boxes. They were glued
to the inside surface and nothing held them securely beyond the glue. Time, humidity,
and bumping into the boxes has detached (possibly half) of the remaining sets
from that series.
Other sellers, who still have these, please chime in with the situation of your
inventory.
Thanks to axaday for pointing out that it is a lenticular and not a hologram.
Nita Rae
|
Precedent is good enough for me. You can submit it to the catalog if you would
like to, Nita Rae.
Cheers,
Randy
|
I think they are fun, and might add them to a future order
|
|
|
|
|
|
|