6171pb08 Horse, Belville with Black Rimmed Eyes with Brown Irises, Black Pupils Small Pattern Parts: Animal, Land
or
*
6171pb10 Horse, Belville with Brown Outlined Eyes with Eye Whites and White Pupils Pattern Parts: Animal, Land
, neither of which
appear in the catalog so far. It would be easy to mistake a used 5855 for a
5871.
Ah, now I see the problem, I overlooked that there are two variants of the set.
Then it belongs to the set 5855, there the brown horse is specified as 6171 (Undetermined
Type). However, catalog entry is marked for deletion. Then Belville horse 6171pb08
still exists in brown right?
6171pb08 Horse, Belville with Black Rimmed Eyes with Brown Irises, Black Pupils Small Pattern Parts: Animal, Land
or
*
6171pb10 Horse, Belville with Brown Outlined Eyes with Eye Whites and White Pupils Pattern Parts: Animal, Land
, neither of which
appear in the catalog so far. It would be easy to mistake a used 5855 for a
5871.
Ah, now I see the problem, I overlooked that there are two variants of the set.
Then it belongs to the set 5855, there the brown horse is specified as 6171 (Undetermined
Type). However, catalog entry is marked for deletion.
Which entry is marked for deletion?
Then Belville horse 6171pb08
still exists in brown right?
Yes it does.
*
6171pb08 Horse, Belville with Black Rimmed Eyes with Brown Irises, Black Pupils Small Pattern Parts: Animal, Land {Brown}
But we still need to find evidence in which set the brown 6171pb08 was included.
From what I understand, the evidence is on its way to axaday.