Discussion Forum: Thread 336750

 Author: Spaceman_Bricks View Messages Posted By Spaceman_Bricks
 Posted: Mar 20, 2023 01:42
 Subject: Part 11090 vs 44873
 Viewed: 104 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
 For:Catalog Associate
 Status:Open
 Report:
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Spaceman_Bricks (539)

Location:  USA, Arizona
Member Since Contact Type Status
Mar 13, 2007 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Build Daily
Hello. Parts 11090 and 44873 are listed under the same entry in the catalog.
I would recommend splitting them out as separate parts as the internal spacing
is different. Part 44873 has a deeper interior spacing.
 
 Author: Nubs_Select View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select
 Posted: Mar 20, 2023 02:02
 Subject: Re: Part 11090 vs 44873
 Viewed: 42 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
 Report:
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Nubs_Select (4774)

Location:  Canada, Ontario
Member Since Contact Type Status
Mar 15, 2016 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store: Nub's Select
In Catalog Requests, Spaceman_Bricks writes:
  Hello. Parts 11090 and 44873 are listed under the same entry in the catalog.
I would recommend splitting them out as separate parts as the internal spacing
is different. Part 44873 has a deeper interior spacing.

I can only image the nightmare of trying to separate those entries when listing
used 🫠(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent
 Author: axaday View Messages Posted By axaday
 Posted: Mar 20, 2023 04:04
 Subject: Re: Part 11090 vs 44873
 Viewed: 58 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
 Report:
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

axaday (8133)

Location:  USA, Oklahoma
Member Since Contact Type Status
Jun 28, 2005 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store: Axaday
In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent

I'd bet it is
 Author: Nubs_Select View Messages Posted By Nubs_Select
 Posted: Mar 20, 2023 11:47
 Subject: Re: Part 11090 vs 44873
 Viewed: 47 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
 Report:
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Nubs_Select (4774)

Location:  Canada, Ontario
Member Since Contact Type Status
Mar 15, 2016 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store: Nub's Select
In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent

I'd bet it is

That would be very helpful
 Author: Spaceman_Bricks View Messages Posted By Spaceman_Bricks
 Posted: Mar 21, 2023 19:38
 Subject: Re: Part 11090 vs 44873
 Viewed: 33 times
 Topic: Catalog Requests
 Report:
Cancel Message
Cancel		Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Spaceman_Bricks (539)

Location:  USA, Arizona
Member Since Contact Type Status
Mar 13, 2007 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: Build Daily
In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
  In Catalog Requests, Spaceman_Bricks writes:
  Hello. Parts 11090 and 44873 are listed under the same entry in the catalog.
I would recommend splitting them out as separate parts as the internal spacing
is different. Part 44873 has a deeper interior spacing.

I can only image the nightmare of trying to separate those entries when listing
used 🫠(odds are the hole positions arnt consistent

From what I have seen, the holes are consistent. I certainly understand the
difficulty in separating it out, and I don't know off hand without more research
when the variance was added. My main thought is that there is a functional difference.