| Discussion Forum: Thread 333159 |
|  | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | ghyde  | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2023 14:01 | | Subject: | Re: Wedge 45301 vs. 89680 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
Since there are differences with the 89680 that don't have the standard hollow
studs there and have reinforcements for whatever reason, I suggest adding it
as it's new part number and then letting the Catalog Admins decide.
It is a significant functional change that would affect how a brick with hollow
stud would connect to this part, because it could not connect at the point where
the reinforcement appears at the beginning of the double curve.
Make a note in the submission detailing how the altered stud connection would
impact use of this part. A lot of SNOT builders would want to be aware of changes
such as this.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2023 14:55 | | Subject: | Re: Wedge 45301 vs. 89680 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, ghyde writes:
| |
Since there are differences with the 89680 that don't have the standard hollow
studs there and have reinforcements for whatever reason, I suggest adding it
as it's new part number and then letting the Catalog Admins decide.
|
Me posting this here is letting the admins decide.  It's easier to post
comparison images in the Forum than on a pending item.
I agree it will likely need a new entry.
Thanks!
Jen
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2023 14:05 | | Subject: | Re: Wedge 45301 vs. 89680 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| | looks like it would be a good one to split |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 10, 2023 15:11 | | Subject: | Re: Wedge 45301 vs. 89680 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, jennnifer writes:
Yes, please submit this as a new entry. The bottom changes lead to functional
building differences.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Illinois
)
)
)
Australia, Queensland
Canada, Ontario
