Discussion Forum: Thread 325569 |
|
|
| | Author: | ZAP_Parts | Posted: | Aug 14, 2022 01:41 | Subject: | Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 104 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi guys,
I have a whole lot of images (of piece parts and minifigures) that are better
quality and clearer than the current main ones on Bricklink (e.g. 'spider01'
is very poor, and I have a better picture of that Animal).
Should I gather the images and send them somewhere they can be replaced on the
catalog listings?
Thanks, love the website!
Z
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | maxx3001 | Posted: | Aug 14, 2022 03:16 | Subject: | Re: Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, ZachLePetit writes:
| Hi guys,
I have a whole lot of images (of piece parts and minifigures) that are better
quality and clearer than the current main ones on Bricklink (e.g. 'spider01'
is very poor, and I have a better picture of that Animal).
Should I gather the images and send them somewhere they can be replaced on the
catalog listings?
Thanks, love the website!
Z
|
You can add some to your post to show and an administrator can have a look?
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | leggodtshop | Posted: | Aug 14, 2022 03:34 | Subject: | Re: Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, ZachLePetit writes:
| Hi guys,
I have a whole lot of images (of piece parts and minifigures) that are better
quality and clearer than the current main ones on Bricklink (e.g. 'spider01'
is very poor, and I have a better picture of that Animal).
Should I gather the images and send them somewhere they can be replaced on the
catalog listings?
Thanks, love the website!
Z
|
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp
Add image is the place to be
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | BricksThatStick | Posted: | Aug 14, 2022 05:50 | Subject: | Re: Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, ZachLePetit writes:
| Hi guys,
I have a whole lot of images (of piece parts and minifigures) that are better
quality and clearer than the current main ones on Bricklink (e.g. 'spider01'
is very poor, and I have a better picture of that Animal).
Should I gather the images and send them somewhere they can be replaced on the
catalog listings?
Thanks, love the website!
Z
|
Yes please.
Familiarise yourself with the details on this page:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=87
And please ensure they are your own original images.
Then as already mentioned please use this page to submit them directly.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp
If you want to do a small batch first then we can provide any feedback or if
you see them approved then all is good.
Thanks,
Paul.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | ZAP_Parts | Posted: | Aug 20, 2022 01:19 | Subject: | Re: Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| "And please ensure they are your own original images."
Hey Paul, Thanks for your comment.
Some of them I have collected in said folders aren't mine, because if I found
a decent pic on Google Images I just grabbed it from there, instead of needing
to take a pic myself.
Is that still a problem? They don't have watermarks.
If it's an issue, I won't bother sending them through on here.
Thanks!
Z
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Aug 20, 2022 02:22 | Subject: | Re: Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | Some of them I have collected in said folders aren't mine, because if I found
a decent pic on Google Images I just grabbed it from there, instead of needing
to take a pic myself.
Is that still a problem? They don't have watermarks.
If it's an issue, I won't bother sending them through on here.
|
Of course it is an issue. You don't own other people's work if you downloaded
their images from other sites. You cannot give other commercial applications
the right to use and make profit from them if you don't own them.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Aug 14, 2022 06:00 | Subject: | Re: Better Quality Mini | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, ZachLePetit writes:
| Hi guys,
I have a whole lot of images (of piece parts and minifigures) that are better
quality and clearer than the current main ones on Bricklink (e.g. 'spider01'
is very poor, and I have a better picture of that Animal).
Should I gather the images and send them somewhere they can be replaced on the
catalog listings?
Thanks, love the website!
|
One thing to consider is that only low resolution images are used for small images.
What might appear a great image can become poor once reduced in size and cropped
if necessary. It is not so bad for minifigs but can be bad for large assemblies.
|
|
|
|
|
|