| Discussion Forum: Thread 316350 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | tec  | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2022 17:08 | | Subject: | 71427c01 | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I'm the author of the exact weight of this
I've a precise electronic scale - 1/100 grams.
Well I think this was a recent variant, because today I found an older speciment.
This old guy is 42.11g.
The newer one was 41.27g.
I double checked today. same scale, same setup.
How could we submit that in the catalog? 2 weights for same part, plus the know-how
to distinguish between older and newer variant.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 27, 2022 18:54 | | Subject: | Re: 71427c01 | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tec writes:
| | I'm the author of the exact weight of this
I've a precise electronic scale - 1/100 grams.
Well I think this was a recent variant, because today I found an older speciment.
This old guy is 42.11g.
The newer one was 41.27g.
I double checked today. same scale, same setup.
How could we submit that in the catalog? 2 weights for same part, plus the know-how
to distinguish between older and newer variant.
|
I don't think a difference of less than 1g is much to be concerned about,
even if there are earlier and later versions of this motor. The biggest difference
is that it weighs a lot more than the other variant (43362c01). It would be better
to have the heavier weight in the catalog to cover the high end of 71427c01,
so you may submit a change request to update it to 42.11g if you would like.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy, Marche
USA, Ohio
