| Discussion Forum: Thread 312191 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | Stellar  | | Posted: | Nov 7, 2021 15:19 | | Subject: | Remove Additional Note from set 10248-1 | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Completed | |
|
| This set was actually approved on July 16, 2015. It was submitted to the BrickLink
catalog June 25, 2015.
July 16 2015 was when the set went on sale for VIPs at lego.com but is this needed
info? I don't think any more sets get notes like this, or do them?
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | BricksThatStick | | Posted: | Nov 7, 2021 15:54 | | Subject: | Re: Remove Additional Note from set 10248-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stellar writes:
| | This set was actually approved on July 16, 2015. It was submitted to the BrickLink
catalog June 25, 2015.
July 16 2015 was when the set went on sale for VIPs at lego.com but is this needed
info? I don't think any more sets get notes like this, or do them?
|
Usually the 'Trainer added this item to the catalog on Jun 25, 2015'
message displays the date it was actually approved rather than the date it was
submitted.
So this says 'Turez added this item to the catalog on Oct 30, 2021'
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?S=40488-1
But tomorrow, once approved, it will say:
'Turez added this item to the catalog on Nov 8, 2021'
In the case you spotted that is the other way round and the date wasn't updated
at the time of approval so I wonder whether it was due to a technical issue at
that time.
Either way its an odd public facing note so I have moved it to the internal note
field for now.
If we discover a reason why it should be displayed for all to see we can move
it back.
Paul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain, Comunidad Valenciana
United Kingdom, England