Discussion Forum: Thread 291730 |
|
|
| | Author: | Landofoz | Posted: | Jun 23, 2021 04:20 | Subject: | 30168 minifigure print on legs | Viewed: | 81 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Does anyone know if there is variants for the mini figure inside polybags of
30168? As the legs are dark blue with print on them and also have print on the
feet or shoe like pattern at the very bottom as seen in the picture for the
inventory listing. I have several sealed and none have print on the feet or shoe
part, is that normal, common or misprint or factory mistake?
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | jbricks | Posted: | Jun 23, 2021 06:15 | Subject: | Re: 30168 minifigure print on legs | Viewed: | 17 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Hello,
I remember from years ago,
In the time that these where given out we had thousands of this polybag.
And parted some out and sold some.
NON of them had printing on the feet.
Best regards,
Janet
In Help, Landofoz writes:
| Does anyone know if there is variants for the mini figure inside polybags of
30168? As the legs are dark blue with print on them and also have print on the
feet or shoe like pattern at the very bottom as seen in the picture for the
inventory listing. I have several sealed and none have print on the feet or shoe
part, is that normal, common or misprint or factory mistake?
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | Turez | Posted: | Jun 23, 2021 09:23 | Subject: | Re: 30168 minifigure print on legs | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, Landofoz writes:
| Does anyone know if there is variants for the mini figure inside polybags of
30168? As the legs are dark blue with print on them and also have print on the
feet or shoe like pattern at the very bottom as seen in the picture for the
inventory listing. I have several sealed and none have print on the feet or shoe
part, is that normal, common or misprint or factory mistake?
|
I just checked several unboxing videos on Youtube and could not find a single
one showing the figure without the feet print. So based on that I would say figures
without the print are not normal, but it could still be a legitimate variant,
especially if it has been found in multiple sets from different sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|