Discussion Forum: Thread 287913

 Author: CamelCityBH View Messages Posted By CamelCityBH
 Posted: Apr 9, 2021 22:25
 Subject: 33299 vs 61408
 Viewed: 70 times
 Topic: Catalog
 Status:Open
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

CamelCityBH (3645)

Location:  USA, North Carolina
Member Since Contact Type Status
Jan 2, 2019 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store: Camel City Brickhouse
While adding inventory this evening, I found that the pictures shown for 33299
and 61408 seem to be reversed. I have a lot of both in multiple colors. The
items that match the images for 61408 clearly show "33299" inside a circle on
one face. The items that match the images for 33299 do not have a part number
visible anywhere. We checked approximately 50 of each.

Is it possible that someone submitted the images wrong?
 Author: Brick.Door View Messages Posted By Brick.Door
 Posted: Apr 9, 2021 22:45
 Subject: Re: 33299 vs 61408
 Viewed: 28 times
 Topic: Catalog
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

Brick.Door (7521)

Location:  USA, New York
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 24, 2010 Contact Member Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store: Brick Door
In Catalog, CamelCityBH writes:
  While adding inventory this evening, I found that the pictures shown for 33299
and 61408 seem to be reversed. I have a lot of both in multiple colors. The
items that match the images for 61408 clearly show "33299" inside a circle on
one face. The items that match the images for 33299 do not have a part number
visible anywhere. We checked approximately 50 of each.

Is it possible that someone submitted the images wrong?

There are several mold variations for 33299, some of them have the extra half
axle (which you can also see in the image for 61408). However Bricklink does
not distinguish between them.

61408 was created as a separate catalog entry because of the shape of the pin
hole - not because of the axle holes. The new smaller pin hole will not accept
a bar, which 33299 does.

So look at the pin hole - it is likely that all the parts you have are 33299
 Author: randyf View Messages Posted By randyf
 Posted: Apr 9, 2021 23:06
 Subject: Re: 33299 vs 61408
 Viewed: 44 times
 Topic: Catalog
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
BrickLink
ID Card

randyf (442)

Location:  USA, Ohio
Member Since Contact Type Status
Sep 16, 2009 Member Does Not Allow Contact Seller
Buying Privileges - OKSelling Privileges - OK
Store Closed Store: The Bricking Spectre
BrickLink Catalog Administrator (?)
In Catalog, CamelCityBH writes:
  While adding inventory this evening, I found that the pictures shown for 33299
and 61408 seem to be reversed. I have a lot of both in multiple colors. The
items that match the images for 61408 clearly show "33299" inside a circle on
one face. The items that match the images for 33299 do not have a part number
visible anywhere. We checked approximately 50 of each.

Is it possible that someone submitted the images wrong?


Any part that is a 61408 will have 61408 molded on the side of it, as it is a
very new part.

Parts that are 33299 may or may not have the part number on them, and the shape
of the axle holes can vary.