|
 |
| | | Author: | Build_Zone  | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 16:06 | | Subject: | (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 211 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Can the Minifigures be added again somehow ?
Why are some of them are marked for deletion?
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Lauren_Luke | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 17:10 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| [BuildZone] writes:
| | Can the Minifigures be added again somehow?
|
When a minifig comes up in a set it is added to the catalogue.
| | Why are some of them are marked for deletion?
|
There are currently (as of writing this message) 88 minifigs marked for deletion.
The additional notes of each minifig catalogue entry will give the reason why
that such minifig is marked for deletion.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | Build_Zone | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 17:25 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, Lauren_Luke writes:
| | [BuildZone] writes:
| | Can the Minifigures be added again somehow?
|
When a minifig comes up in a set it is added to the catalogue.
| | Why are some of them are marked for deletion?
|
There are currently (as of writing this message) 88 minifigs marked for deletion.
The additional notes of each minifig catalogue entry will give the reason why
that such minifig is marked for deletion
|
Thanks.
But not on all of them they say why.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 17:50 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 78 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| It should be safe to assume that there is an error with the catalog entry for
that fig and there's likely a correct version of the fig in the catalog.
Otherwise, provide some examples.
| | But not on all of them they say why.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Build_Zone | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 20:41 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, tEoS writes:
| | It should be safe to assume that there is an error with the catalog entry for
that fig and there's likely a correct version of the fig in the catalog.
Otherwise, provide some examples.
| | But not on all of them they say why.
|
|
Minifigure arc010
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Nov 18, 2018 21:04 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | In Searching, tEoS writes:
| | It should be safe to assume that there is an error with the catalog entry for
that fig and there's likely a correct version of the fig in the catalog.
Otherwise, provide some examples.
| | But not on all of them they say why.
|
|
Minifigure arc010
|
That minifigure probably never appeared in any set in that configuration of parts.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 02:46 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | In Searching, tEoS writes:
| | It should be safe to assume that there is an error with the catalog entry for
that fig and there's likely a correct version of the fig in the catalog.
Otherwise, provide some examples.
| | But not on all of them they say why.
|
|
Minifigure arc010
|
Basically it's sans backpack.
I suppose this Figure got added as alternate but actually did not appear in the
set in this style.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 03:11 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 82 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | Can the Minifigures be added again somehow ?
Why are some of them are marked for deletion?
|
Most of the minifigures currently marked for deletion have been that way for
years, some for many years. However, this fact became much more noticeable recently
when I added MARKED FOR DELETION to their titles.
Most of them were marked for deletion because they did not meet inventory standards:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=200
The figures marked for deletion don't need to be added to the catalog again
because the majority of them (actually, probably all of them) were already added
again with correct photos/inventories according to inventory standards.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | Build_Zone | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 08:36 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, StormChaser writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | Can the Minifigures be added again somehow ?
Why are some of them are marked for deletion?
|
Most of the minifigures currently marked for deletion have been that way for
years, some for many years. However, this fact became much more noticeable recently
when I added MARKED FOR DELETION to their titles.
Most of them were marked for deletion because they did not meet inventory standards:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=200
The figures marked for deletion don't need to be added to the catalog again
because the majority of them (actually, probably all of them) were already added
again with correct photos/inventories according to inventory standards.
|
Ok, thank you very much for the explanation. But actually writing in the titles
"Marked for Deletion" should be allowed only for Admin. But that's just my
opinion.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 09:00 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | […]
Ok, thank you very much for the explanation. But actually writing in the titles
"Marked for Deletion" should be allowed only for Admin. But that's just my
opinion.
|
StormChaser IS admin.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Build_Zone | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 09:10 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | […]
Ok, thank you very much for the explanation. But actually writing in the titles
"Marked for Deletion" should be allowed only for Admin. But that's just my
opinion.
|
StormChaser IS admin.
|
Sorry I didn't see he's an Admin. I didn't mean it that way. So if
marking for deletion is allowed only for Admin that's ok so. I thought that
everybody can mark it like that. Thank you all very much for your help and explanation,
I really appreciate it.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 10:02 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | In Searching, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | […]
Ok, thank you very much for the explanation. But actually writing in the titles
"Marked for Deletion" should be allowed only for Admin. But that's just my
opinion.
|
StormChaser IS admin.
|
Sorry I didn't see he's an Admin. I didn't mean it that way.
|
Sorry too, I put it a bit rudely… maybe should have added a smiley or something
| | So if
marking for deletion is allowed only for Admin that's ok so. I thought that
everybody can mark it like that. Thank you all very much for your help and explanation,
I really appreciate it.
|
Anybody can ask whatever but only admins can accept or decline requests. Otherwise,
it would be a fine mess
So, if something was done, it was obligatory done by an admin. And admins usually
don’t do anything stupid.
The catalogue has some inconsistencies but they are worked upon. And, without
discrediting the other admins, StormChaser is cleaning tornado.
As you can see with these minifigs, a lot have been marked for deletion without
anyone doing anything about them (like sellers keeping selling them while they
shouldn’t). Just putting that big mark should (and already has) wake(n) them
up.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Build_Zone | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 19:48 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | In Searching, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | […]
Ok, thank you very much for the explanation. But actually writing in the titles
"Marked for Deletion" should be allowed only for Admin. But that's just my
opinion.
|
StormChaser IS admin.
|
Sorry I didn't see he's an Admin. I didn't mean it that way.
|
Sorry too, I put it a bit rudely… maybe should have added a smiley or something
| | So if
marking for deletion is allowed only for Admin that's ok so. I thought that
everybody can mark it like that. Thank you all very much for your help and explanation,
I really appreciate it.
|
Anybody can ask whatever but only admins can accept or decline requests. Otherwise,
it would be a fine mess
So, if something was done, it was obligatory done by an admin. And admins usually
don’t do anything stupid.
The catalogue has some inconsistencies but they are worked upon. And, without
discrediting the other admins, StormChaser is cleaning tornado.
As you can see with these minifigs, a lot have been marked for deletion without
anyone doing anything about them (like sellers keeping selling them while they
shouldn’t). Just putting that big mark should (and already has) wake(n) them
up.
|
Hi I couldn’t reply earlier.
I didn’t found it rude from your side  Even thanks for that I really didn’t
check who give the answer. It was my fault
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Build_Zone | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 19:56 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | In Searching, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Searching, BuildZone writes:
| | […]
Ok, thank you very much for the explanation. But actually writing in the titles
"Marked for Deletion" should be allowed only for Admin. But that's just my
opinion.
|
StormChaser IS admin.
|
Sorry I didn't see he's an Admin. I didn't mean it that way.
|
Sorry too, I put it a bit rudely… maybe should have added a smiley or something
| | So if
marking for deletion is allowed only for Admin that's ok so. I thought that
everybody can mark it like that. Thank you all very much for your help and explanation,
I really appreciate it.
|
Anybody can ask whatever but only admins can accept or decline requests. Otherwise,
it would be a fine mess
So, if something was done, it was obligatory done by an admin. And admins usually
don’t do anything stupid.
The catalogue has some inconsistencies but they are worked upon. And, without
discrediting the other admins, StormChaser is cleaning tornado.
As you can see with these minifigs, a lot have been marked for deletion without
anyone doing anything about them (like sellers keeping selling them while they
shouldn’t). Just putting that big mark should (and already has) wake(n) them
up.
|
Forgot to say THANKS to StormChaser for the explanation
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Nov 19, 2018 21:18 | | Subject: | Re: (MARKED FOR DELETION) Why?? | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| | And admins usually don’t do anything stupid.
|
I added some emphasis to your comment. 
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland, Westmeath
Australia, Queensland
USA, Michigan
Germany, Schleswig-Holstein
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine