Discussion Forum: Thread 229067 |
|
|
| | Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Dec 7, 2017 10:47 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8284-1 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4032b Black Plate, Round 2 x 2 with Axle Hole - X Opening (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Black 4032 Plate, Round 2 x 2 with Axle Hole {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
When checking this set before sale (bricks have never been mixed with other bricks), I found this alternate.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | normann1974 | Posted: | Dec 7, 2017 10:59 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8284-1 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 4032b Black Plate, Round 2 x 2 with Axle Hole - X Opening (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Black 4032 Plate, Round 2 x 2 with Axle Hole {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
When checking this set before sale (bricks have never been mixed with other bricks), I found this alternate.
|
I own this set. It has only been assembled once, and the bricks have never been
mixed with other bricks and I'm 100% convinced there are no bricks missing.
But nevertheless, I found different extras in this set:
There were 3 of these
instead of 2 and there were only 2 of these
instead of 3.
My extras happen to be identical to the numbers on Peeron. I can see that "maninblack"
removed one 32002 when he split the inventory into regulars/extras in 2007. I
bet that was an error.
Please advise me how I should handle this. Should I send an inventory request
for both parts, only part 32002, or no changes at all?
The attached image also documents the 4032b alternate.
Best wishes,
Jan
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Dec 8, 2017 04:18 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8284-1 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| Please advise me how I should handle this. Should I send an inventory request
for both parts, only part 32002, or no changes at all?
|
Give me a little time to review this (might take a few days). I need to review
the change logs and set instructions and see if perhaps alternate set instructions
exist.
I won't forget about it, though.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Dec 9, 2017 03:15 | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8284-1 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| Please advise me how I should handle this. Should I send an inventory request
for both parts, only part 32002, or no changes at all?
|
Okay, I've had a chance to examine this inventory and the set instructions.
For this part:
I agree that there was likely an error in the 2007 changes and I will approve
your change request when you submit it.
For this part:
The original inventory source indicated that 3 extras were present and, considering
that 23 were included in the set, this does not seem unlikely. Therefore, I
think it would be best to leave that one alone. I know from experience that
sets do not always include the same extras or the same number of extras, so I
do not consider it wise to remove extras unless there is a compelling reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|