Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | bje  | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 07:52 | | Subject: | Re: Sets Members Want Project | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
snip
I'm still waiting to add an inventory for Batman and Robin and a few others.
My instructuons for that Batman and Robin model has unfortunatly gotten a bit
damaged, but the parts are still sealed in the container, thank goodness.
|
 |
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 07:25 | | Subject: | Re: Sets Members Want Project | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, bje writes:
| | From the to-do list:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
Add Sets Members Want - A project to discuss and possibly add pickable
models, in-store builds, and other similar sets to the catalog...
Project Review: This project traveled directly from under consideration to completed.
There were no existing guidelines discussing these kinds of sets, so no policy
changes were required. Instead, after administrative discussion, the majority
were in agreement to rescind the unwritten rule that prohibited addition of these
sets.
Date first added: December 6th, 2018
Date work began: June 13th, 2020
Goal for completion: July 1st, 2020
Date actually completed: June 17th, 2020
Suggested by: Many members
Maybe this is not so complete as catmins would like to believe it is as it appears
that none of those sets are in the catalogue at this time.
Also:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1204676
seems to be voided now.
So perhaps this project should be set to under consideration again just so the
ball is not dropped and the technical issues, whatever those may be, can be addressed
before the goal date. I would dearly like to believe that BL will eventually
give members what they want.
|
Funny enough, I found a couple of sticker sheets for Superman the other day.
https://brickset.com/sets/SUPERMAN-1/Superman
But it's a shame that I have used all the parts for something else now.
|
|
|
| Author: | bje | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 07:05 | | Subject: | Sets Members Want Project | | Viewed: | 132 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| From the to-do list:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2476
Add Sets Members Want - A project to discuss and possibly add pickable
models, in-store builds, and other similar sets to the catalog...
Project Review: This project traveled directly from under consideration to completed.
There were no existing guidelines discussing these kinds of sets, so no policy
changes were required. Instead, after administrative discussion, the majority
were in agreement to rescind the unwritten rule that prohibited addition of these
sets.
Date first added: December 6th, 2018
Date work began: June 13th, 2020
Goal for completion: July 1st, 2020
Date actually completed: June 17th, 2020
Suggested by: Many members
Maybe this is not so complete as catmins would like to believe it is as it appears
that none of those sets are in the catalogue at this time.
Also:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1204676
seems to be voided now.
So perhaps this project should be set to under consideration again just so the
ball is not dropped and the technical issues, whatever those may be, can be addressed
before the goal date. I would dearly like to believe that BL will eventually
give members what they want.
|
|
| Author: | BricksThatStick | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 04:46 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 30452-1 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 42445 Trans-Clear Bar 12L with 1 x 2 Plate End Solid Studs and 1 x 1 Round Plate End (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 1 Part Trans-Clear 99784 Bar 12L with 1 x 2 Plate End Hollow Studs and 1 x 1 Round Plate End {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1207215
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 03:39 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| To come back on the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) the variations in
print are due to the material (CA, ABS) and the mold pip (edge, side):
1. CA with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1958-1963). Old logo is wide straight.
2. ABS with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1963-1968). Old logo is wide round.
3. ABS with modern logo and side mold pip (around 1968-......)
See pictures.
This also explains the variantion in the print, which are in all the 3 cases
embossed. The 3005pt{number} is also embossed and the 3005pt{number}b has a surface
print.
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| | Within the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) I found also some difference
in the print. See picture. For example number 6: right in the picture has an
old logo on the stud and the two on the left have modern and old logo on the
stud, but I think this are just variations.
So maybe a reshuffle of the images, variantions and sets appearing is in order.
Also looking at set 237, because the bold numbered bricks could not be a alternate
for this set. The bold numbers all have a modern logo (1968) and yet in 1966
the set 237 (1960) was replaced by set 437. So the bold numbered bricks could
be a alternate for set 437, but not for set 237.
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 03:24 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 347-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, primadeluxe writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 3189a Red Door 1 x 3 x 2 Left with Thin Handle (Alternate)
* Add 1 Part 3188a Red Door 1 x 3 x 2 Right with Thin Handle (Alternate)
Comments from Submitter:
I am not sure if this set just came with these doors with thin handles, as the set has at least been issued twice (one with FTPine and one with GTPine). That is why I submit the doors with thin handles as a alternate, because these are in the set I bought as a child. Or was it a birthdaypresent? Hahaha!
|
Just like the other sets that have had the doors replaced, there is a very strong
possibility that this set never had the thick-handled doors.
Instead of adding these doors as alternates, I am going to put them in the Regular
Items section since they chronologically came before the doors with thick handles.
I am also going to remove the thick-handled doors from the inventory. If someone
can later prove that this set ever came with thick-handled doors, then those
can be readded as alternates to the thin-handled versions.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 30, 2020 03:04 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 71044-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, JamesHugMD writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {2 to 3} Part Pearl Gold 85861 Plate, Round 1 x 1 with Open Stud (Extra)
* Change {1 to 2} Part Red 3024 Plate 1 x 1 (Extra)
* Change {1 to 2} Part White 85861 Plate, Round 1 x 1 with Open Stud (Extra)
* Change {2 to 1} Part Tan 3024 Plate 1 x 1 (Extra)
Comments from Submitter:
I built this set brand new from LEGO.com I double checked my extra parts and compared between Bricklink and Rebrickable.
|
I watched a real-time build of the entire set, and all of the extras listed in
the inventory on BrickLink were correct except for the four changes that you
have outlined here.
Requests accepted.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | B3iR3 | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 18:56 | | Subject: | Re: wanted list | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Hi Nick
I didnt realise this, thanks for the tip! i will try out!
B3iR3
In Suggestions, namenick123 writes:
| | If I understand you correctly, you can accomplish this by going into your Wanted
List and click on "Apply Order" on the top right. It will then give you a list
of your most recent orders and you can select whichever order applies to that
Wanted List. The amounts purchased will then appear in the "have" amount under
the wanted amount for each item.
Hope this helps.
Nick
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 18:31 | | Subject: | Re: wanted list | | Viewed: | 15 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, namenick123 writes:
| | If I understand you correctly, you can accomplish this by going into your Wanted
List and click on "Apply Order" on the top right. It will then give you a list
of your most recent orders and you can select whichever order applies to that
Wanted List. The amounts purchased will then appear in the "have" amount under
the wanted amount for each item.
Hope this helps.
Nick
|
Beware with this feature: you can apply the same order multiple times, even to
the same list.
So an ordered part will be counted multiple times.
Also, do not take for granted that an ordered part will be in the package or
that you’ll receive the package. Most of the time, the part will be there and
the package will arrive, but there might be errors, missing parts, wrong colours….
|
|
| Author: | namenick123 | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 18:16 | | Subject: | Re: wanted list | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| If I understand you correctly, you can accomplish this by going into your Wanted
List and click on "Apply Order" on the top right. It will then give you a list
of your most recent orders and you can select whichever order applies to that
Wanted List. The amounts purchased will then appear in the "have" amount under
the wanted amount for each item.
Hope this helps.
Nick
|
|
| Author: | B3iR3 | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 17:14 | | Subject: | wanted list | | Viewed: | 74 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hello
I would like the wanted list(s) to be automatically updated when i purchase certain
items that are on those list(s).
It would really save me a lot of time not having to figure out which items to
delete from the wanted list(s), and which ones to keep.
Kind regards
B3iR3
|
| Author: | MFelgate | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 14:29 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 42080-1 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 58176 Trans-Orange Bar with Light Cover (Bulb) / Bionicle Barraki Eye (Extra)
* Add 1 Part 43093 Blue Technic, Axle Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 10:59 | | Subject: | Re: can't find part 11113? | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Sportsgurl writes:
| | Hi, searching for part 11113 produces nothing but that seems to be the part number.
Does this need to be added to the catalog? Or am I missing something?
TIA
Joy
|
Search Tips here -
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=29
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 10:46 | | Subject: | Re: can't find part 11113? | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Sportsgurl writes:
| | Hi, searching for part 11113 produces nothing but that seems to be the part number.
Does this need to be added to the catalog? Or am I missing something?
TIA
Joy
|
add a * for all results "part1113*"
|
| Author: | Sportsgurl | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 10:43 | | Subject: | can't find part 11113? | | Viewed: | 88 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi, searching for part 11113 produces nothing but that seems to be the part number.
Does this need to be added to the catalog? Or am I missing something?
TIA
Joy
|
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 06:53 | | Subject: | Re: sw0527a r2-d2 misprint? | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, iprice writes:
| | In Help, spacecaptain writes:
| | has anyone seen this? the head is rotated 45 degrees. it came in 75257. i
can't find any pictures anywhere.
|
I'm amazed that, despite the head being rotated, it's actualy printed
level. That's gotta be a misprint! 
|
It is interesting that all the colours are aligned correctly on an unaligned
part, so they must be doing "wet-on-wet" printing - printing one colour directly
after another without moving the part.
|
|
| Author: | iprice | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 06:41 | | Subject: | Re: sw0527a r2-d2 misprint? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, spacecaptain writes:
| | has anyone seen this? the head is rotated 45 degrees. it came in 75257. i
can't find any pictures anywhere.
|
I'm amazed that, despite the head being rotated, it's actualy printed
level. That's gotta be a misprint!
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 05:07 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 20 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Alternate) (match ID 6)
* Delete 2 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
* Change {18 to 20} Part Black 6558 Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise {match ID 6 to 0}
* Change 4 Part White 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part White 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 6628 Technic, Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise and Tow Ball {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
|
|
Follow-up from:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1207021
Peeron has the the earliest version, in which we can see white
and light gray
I do have another version with ID 120530, that has extra pages 16-17.
On the insturctions page 16-17, there are white
and light gray
and on the extra pages 16-17, there are light gray
and black
Question: in what set and which version of insturctions, light gray
is used?!
Answer: set
So TLG did a back and forth 6540a-6540b-6540a
Questions 2: Is there any difference between white 6540a (from 1994) and light
gray 6540a (from 1999)?
****************
There are 20 of black
used on both versions as follows:
2 page 12 step 14
2 page 20 step 21
2 page 24 step 24
4 page 36 step 5
4 page 36 step 6
2 page 37 step 30
2 page 38 step 31
2 page 42 step 7
2 page 43 step 8
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:53 | | Subject: | Re: sw0527a r2-d2 misprint? | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, infinibrix writes:
| | In Help, spacecaptain writes:
| | has anyone seen this? the head is rotated 45 degrees. it came in 75257. i
can't find any pictures anywhere.
|
Almost certainly a misprint but something that I think will be worth something
to the right person as its set at a nice rotating angle and whilst you can always
set heads at a full 90 degrees where its facing out from the side that angle
always looks a bit forced. I think someone would appreciate something like that
for a display scene compared with always having their astromech droids facing
forwards the whole time 
In fact rather than re-releasing almost identical R2-D2's it would be a nice
touch if Lego intentionally made some like this to give a bit more variation
to what is otherwise a difficult minifigure to make look unique when compared
with other minifig characters.
I have lots of those heads and they look to all be facing forwards from what
I can tell
|
Of course with it being a relatively new set there is always the possibility
that someone doing the set inventory assumed it was the same version as what
appears in the other sets but given the Lego site has images of this minifig
facing forwards I can't imaging it to be an intentional difference?
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:41 | | Subject: | Re: sw0527a r2-d2 misprint? | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Help | |
|
| In Help, spacecaptain writes:
| | has anyone seen this? the head is rotated 45 degrees. it came in 75257. i
can't find any pictures anywhere.
|
Almost certainly a misprint but something that I think will be worth something
to the right person as its set at a nice rotating angle and whilst you can always
set heads at a full 90 degrees where its facing out from the side that angle
always looks a bit forced. I think someone would appreciate something like that
for a display scene compared with always having their astromech droids facing
forwards the whole time
In fact rather than re-releasing almost identical R2-D2's it would be a nice
touch if Lego intentionally made some like this to give a bit more variation
to what is otherwise a difficult minifigure to make look unique when compared
with other minifig characters.
I have lots of those heads and they look to all be facing forwards from what
I can tell
|
|
| Author: | Roxyncz | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:23 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60138-1 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 92593pb037 White Plate, Modified 1 x 4 with 2 Studs without Groove with 'CS60138' License Plate Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 87616pb012 Dark Bluish Gray Aircraft Fuselage Curved Aft Section 6 x 10 Bottom with Gray and White Lines and '60138' on Blue Background Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
* Add 2 Part 61678pb124 Dark Red Slope, Curved 4 x 1 with Silver Vents Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 6636pb211 Blue Tile 1 x 6 with Blue 'POLICE' on White Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 6079pb08 White Fence 1 x 8 x 2 2/3 with Black and Yellow Danger Stripes Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 93589pb009 Dark Red Wedge 4 x 2 x 1 1/3 with 1 x 4 Base with Grille and Black Stripes Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 45677pb122 White Wedge 4 x 4 x 2/3 Triple Curved with Blue Number 02 on White Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60138 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:10 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6382-1 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Yes, I just submitted it yesterday. So it would have been nice to finish it myself,
but thanks for your time!
In Inventories Requests, AFOLliquidation writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA196pb01 Red Stickered Assembly 12 x 6 x 2 1/3 with Fire Pattern (Sticker) - Set 6382 - 3 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 4, 1 Plate 6 x 10 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
This item number is already in the system it just needs to be linked to set 6382
|
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 02:07 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 180-1 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA198pb01L Black Stickered Assembly 8 x 1 x 2 with Red '180' with Oval Border on Black Background Pattern Model Left Side (Sticker) - Set 180 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA198pb01R Black Stickered Assembly 8 x 1 x 2 with Red '180' with Oval Border on Black Background Pattern Model Right Side (Sticker) - Set 180 - 1 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA197pb01 Black Stickered Assembly 4 x 4 x 2 with Red '180' with Oval Border on Black Background Pattern (Sticker) - Set 180 - 1 Brick 1 x 4, 2 Slopes 45 2 X 4 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | Vosblokjes | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 01:44 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60071-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 88930pb122 Dark Blue Slope, Curved 2 x 4 x 2/3 with Bottom Tubes with '06' and 'POLICE' Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60071 (Counterpart)
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 00:35 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | | They will probably sit for longer until I can muster up the courage to go through it.
|
you already muster up the courage 
You can easily accept the request for changing 18 to 20 of black 6558. I gave
you everything you need.
I also received this week a new box-opened version that I bought few weeks ago.
I can provide any information you need. Mine is the later version.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2020 00:18 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 20 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Alternate) (match ID 6)
* Delete 2 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
* Change {18 to 20} Part Black 6558 Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise {match ID 6 to 0}
* Change 4 Part White 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part White 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 6628 Technic, Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise and Tow Ball {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
|
There are a lot of pending requests for this set from multiple people. It is
one of the toughest scenarios that I have ever encountered and has been sitting
on the back burner for quite some time due to the difficulty. They will probably
sit for longer until I can muster up the courage to go through it. This is one
of the sets that was passed from one inventory admin to another to another...
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 23:56 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location:  USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
 |
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 20 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Alternate) (match ID 6)
* Delete 2 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
* Change {18 to 20} Part Black 6558 Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise {match ID 6 to 0}
* Change 4 Part White 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part White 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 6628 Technic, Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise and Tow Ball {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
|
This set has been on my list of "tough things to figure out" for a long time
now. I don't think it is possible to use match ID 99 in this case.
|
I figured this, but maybe it is better to include match ID 99 and an extra note
for the three versions(maybe four?) of the insturcitons we know exist.
As it is now, the extra note refers to match ID 99 but there is none in the current
inventory.
|
I removed the mention of MID 99 in the note. It was there because a standard
format was used for the notes in all of these "redesign" cases and it just slipped
through.
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 23:53 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 20 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Alternate) (match ID 6)
* Delete 2 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
* Change {18 to 20} Part Black 6558 Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise {match ID 6 to 0}
* Change 4 Part White 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part White 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 6628 Technic, Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise and Tow Ball {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
|
This set has been on my list of "tough things to figure out" for a long time
now. I don't think it is possible to use match ID 99 in this case.
|
I figured this, but maybe it is better to include match ID 99 and an extra note
for the three versions(maybe four?) of the insturcitons we know exist.
As it is now, the extra note refers to match ID 99 but there is none in the current
inventory.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 23:50 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
| Location: USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
|
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 20 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Alternate) (match ID 6)
* Delete 2 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
* Change {18 to 20} Part Black 6558 Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise {match ID 6 to 0}
* Change 4 Part White 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part White 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 6628 Technic, Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise and Tow Ball {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
|
This set has been on my list of "tough things to figure out" for a long time
now. I don't think it is possible to use match ID 99 in this case.
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 23:32 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 8880-1 | | Viewed: | 68 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 20 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Alternate) (match ID 6)
* Delete 2 Part 6558 Black Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise (Extra)
* Change {18 to 20} Part Black 6558 Technic, Pin 3L with Friction Ridges Lengthwise {match ID 6 to 0}
* Change 4 Part White 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 6540a Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Pin Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part White 6540b Technic, Steering Arm Large with Wheel Hub Holder - Axle Connection (Alternate) {match ID 1 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Light Gray 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 6628 Technic, Pin with Friction Ridges Lengthwise and Tow Ball {match ID 4 to 99}
* Change 4 Part Black 2736 Technic, Axle Tow Ball (Alternate) {match ID 4 to 99}
|
|
| Author: | spacecaptain | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 21:54 | | Subject: | sw0527a r2-d2 misprint? | | Viewed: | 113 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
|
| has anyone seen this? the head is rotated 45 degrees. it came in 75257. i
can't find any pictures anywhere.
|
|
| Author: | AFOLliquidation | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 19:26 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 6382-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA196pb01 Red Stickered Assembly 12 x 6 x 2 1/3 with Fire Pattern (Sticker) - Set 6382 - 3 Brick 1 x 6, 1 Brick 1 x 4, 1 Plate 6 x 10 (Counterpart)
Comments from Submitter:
This item number is already in the system it just needs to be linked to set 6382
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 17:44 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Voted no. I don't see the value in increasing NPB and NSS. I'm not
sure why you think it is difficult to keep NPB/NSS at 0 completed.
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 15:11 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Within the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) I found also some difference
in the print. See picture. For example number 6: right in the picture has an
old logo on the stud and the two on the left have modern and old logo on the
stud, but I think this are just variations.
So maybe a reshuffle of the images, variantions and sets appearing is in order.
Also looking at set 237, because the bold numbered bricks could not be a alternate
for this set. The bold numbers all have a modern logo (1968) and yet in 1966
the set 237 (1960) was replaced by set 437. So the bold numbered bricks could
be a alternate for set 437, but not for set 237.
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 14:28 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 14:15 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | I agree with no NPB and no feedback for mutual cancellations. In my experience,
the bulk of completed NPB's are users who just simply refuse to communicate.
The Buyers who request cancellation in my store will get cancelled without incident,
with few exceptions. However, when a large order is placed, with many lots, and
a good amount of time spent pulling it together, it does not leave the Seller
with good feelings towards a cancelling Buyer.
|
Yes, that is why I don't pick and pack before payment.
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 13:46 | | Subject: | NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 103 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hello,
I'm here since 10 years and I really find it wrong that a newcomer has 3
NPB as much as someone who is here since years.
I'll explain you why.
I really believe that a newcomer with 0 to 9 feedbacks shouldn't be allowed
to have more than 1 NPB chance. If you miss that, you're out.
As a seller, I have been targeted too much with newcomers that realize they don't
want to buy after the order was placed. This means my bricks are blocked for
7 to 21 days.
If I do cancel the order, the buyer can give me a negative, so I have to undergo
the NPB procedure in order to prevent the seller from giving nasty feedbacks.
My suggestion follows like this:
0-9 feedbacks rating : 1 NPB / NSS
10-99 2 NPB / NSS
100-999 3 NPB / NSS
1000-9999 4 NPB / NSS
10k+ 5 NPB / NSS
I believe that sellers may be targeted with NSS for facticious reasons, like
"1 piece wasn't in the package, I start a NSS" from a 0 fb rookie who still
doesn't know how BL works. Sometimes BL takes a lot of time to reply and
this lead in the past in the closing of many shops for a third NSS which wasn't
actually real. Giving a 4th or 5th NSS chance it's just a compensation for
possible "fake NSSs".
I'd personally prevent 0-9 feedback rating users from leaving negative feedbacks
too. But that's another story.
|
|
| Author: | kzinti | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 13:27 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | | | If I do cancel the order, the buyer can give me a negative, so I have to undergo
the NPB procedure in order to prevent the seller from giving nasty feedbacks.
|
I think this is part of the issue. If a buyer contacts a seller and asks if they
can cancel and the seller agrees, I see no reason for NPB or feedback. The seller
knows the buyer doesn't want to proceed so could cancel the order and none
of their inventory is held up. There is no need for the seller to leave negative
feedback for a buyer if the buyer has asked for the cancellation and the seller
mutually agrees. I'd prefer to see it that if the order is mutually cancelled,
then no feedback should be allowed from either party. I think it is quite nasty
for a seller to mutually agree to cancel an order, then leave negative feedback
as the buyer asked to cancel. It is just vindictive. If sellers do this, then
there is little point in the buyer asking to cancel, they might as well just
sit it out and wait for the NPB, holding up the seller's inventory all that
time.
I'd much prefer to have buyers that ask to cancel than ones that do not contact
and just sit and wait it out even though they have no intention of paying.
|
I agree with no NPB and no feedback for mutual cancellations. In my experience,
the bulk of completed NPB's are users who just simply refuse to communicate.
The Buyers who request cancellation in my store will get cancelled without incident,
with few exceptions. However, when a large order is placed, with many lots, and
a good amount of time spent pulling it together, it does not leave the Seller
with good feelings towards a cancelling Buyer.
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 11:31 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, HC writes:
| | hi,Ton
indeed ,we talked about this in person a few days ago,yes I know YOU posted this
a while ago.
and I thought it was worth mentioning again in my reply,
so you must be proud of me that I accepted your lessons once again,my master
|
I am proud of you my Padawan.
I am also proud you surpassed me in selling, in that you have become a master
yourself.
| | | |
Part of this is suggested years and years ago (you know who did this Hans...
😉) and it keeps coming up on this forum but Bricklink doesn’t seems to do anything
with it.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | HC | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 08:29 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| hi,Ton
indeed ,we talked about this in person a few days ago,yes I know YOU posted this
a while ago.
and I thought it was worth mentioning again in my reply,
so you must be proud of me that I accepted your lessons once again,my master
| |
Part of this is suggested years and years ago (you know who did this Hans...
😉) and it keeps coming up on this forum but Bricklink doesn’t seems to do anything
with it.
|
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 08:03 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | 4.when a buyer or seller has had no negative/neutral feedback for the last 5
years or so,his/her negatives or neutrals older then 5 years should be removed
from the scoreboard
so this is an extra motivation to improve quality or behaviour
|
If old negatives are removed, then old positives should also be removed. After
all, if bad behaviour is removed from a record, then so should any good feedback
at the same time.
I have no problem with the positive praise rating being calculated over the past
year or five years or whatever, but I don't think old feedback should ever
be removed.
|
|
| Author: | hpoort | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 07:14 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 06:05 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, HC writes:
| | good morning.Shintaku
good suggestions...I totaly agree with you.
would like to add a few more.
1.the one who wants to just cancel the order in between
[ buyer or seller and for whatever the reason] should not be allowed to give
feedback.
2.when a buyer pays AFTER an NPB alert he/she should not be allowed to give feedback.
3.obvious retaliation feedback should be removed more easy on request
4.when a buyer or seller has had no negative/neutral feedback for the last 5
years or so,his/her negatives or neutrals older then 5 years should be removed
from the scoreboard
so this is an extra motivation to improve quality or behaviour
kind regards,,Hans
|
Part of this is suggested years and years ago (you know who did this Hans...
😉) and it keeps coming up on this forum but Bricklink doesn’t seems to do anything
with it.
I agree on some parts like:
1) OCR from a buyer should mean a buyer can only leave positive feedback when
the OCR was granted.
2) OCR from seller means the can only leave positive feedback when the OCR is
granted by the buyer.
So, in both cases, the one that takes the initiative should honor the other person
with non other than positive, or no feedback at all.
Suggestion 2: after a start of the NPB but before completing an NPB is a dificult
one.
I somehow agree with you due to the fact it is possible a buyer will retaliate,
on the other hand there may occur a different problem like bad products inside
the order.
So, maybe, only neutral or positive feedback is possible?
Suggestion 3 I agree on.
4) I do not think I would agree on, if non positive feedback is or was deserved
it might still be good to see what happened. Sometimes people fall back into
older habits and it can be usefull to notice this as early as possible.
Maybe, if wanted, the system could be putting less pressure on very old non positive
feedback but for me this would not be too important to change.
Taking away negative feedback from members would be a possible blow to the members
that gave them, there was a serious problem and they gave it with a good reason.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 05:49 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | If I do cancel the order, the buyer can give me a negative, so I have to undergo
the NPB procedure in order to prevent the seller from giving nasty feedbacks.
|
I think this is part of the issue. If a buyer contacts a seller and asks if they
can cancel and the seller agrees, I see no reason for NPB or feedback. The seller
knows the buyer doesn't want to proceed so could cancel the order and none
of their inventory is held up. There is no need for the seller to leave negative
feedback for a buyer if the buyer has asked for the cancellation and the seller
mutually agrees. I'd prefer to see it that if the order is mutually cancelled,
then no feedback should be allowed from either party. I think it is quite nasty
for a seller to mutually agree to cancel an order, then leave negative feedback
as the buyer asked to cancel. It is just vindictive. If sellers do this, then
there is little point in the buyer asking to cancel, they might as well just
sit it out and wait for the NPB, holding up the seller's inventory all that
time.
I'd much prefer to have buyers that ask to cancel than ones that do not contact
and just sit and wait it out even though they have no intention of paying.
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 05:45 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
|
| Author: | primadeluxe | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 05:17 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| | In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
| Author: | HC | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 05:11 | | Subject: | Re: NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| good morning.Shintaku
good suggestions...I totaly agree with you.
would like to add a few more.
1.the one who wants to just cancel the order in between
[ buyer or seller and for whatever the reason] should not be allowed to give
feedback.
2.when a buyer pays AFTER an NPB alert he/she should not be allowed to give feedback.
3.obvious retaliation feedback should be removed more easy on request
4.when a buyer or seller has had no negative/neutral feedback for the last 5
years or so,his/her negatives or neutrals older then 5 years should be removed
from the scoreboard
so this is an extra motivation to improve quality or behaviour
kind regards,,Hans
|
|
| Author: | Edwin073 | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 04:46 | | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| | Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
| Author: | Shintaku | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 04:42 | | Subject: | NPBs and NSSs proportional to feedback rating | | Viewed: | 129 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hello,
I'm here since 10 years and I really find it wrong that a newcomer has 3
NPB as much as someone who is here since years.
I'll explain you why.
I really believe that a newcomer with 0 to 9 feedbacks shouldn't be allowed
to have more than 1 NPB chance. If you miss that, you're out.
As a seller, I have been targeted too much with newcomers that realize they don't
want to buy after the order was placed. This means my bricks are blocked for
7 to 21 days.
If I do cancel the order, the buyer can give me a negative, so I have to undergo
the NPB procedure in order to prevent the seller from giving nasty feedbacks.
My suggestion follows like this:
0-9 feedbacks rating : 1 NPB / NSS
10-99 2 NPB / NSS
100-999 3 NPB / NSS
1000-9999 4 NPB / NSS
10k+ 5 NPB / NSS
I believe that sellers may be targeted with NSS for facticious reasons, like
"1 piece wasn't in the package, I start a NSS" from a 0 fb rookie who still
doesn't know how BL works. Sometimes BL takes a lot of time to reply and
this lead in the past in the closing of many shops for a third NSS which wasn't
actually real. Giving a 4th or 5th NSS chance it's just a compensation for
possible "fake NSSs".
I'd personally prevent 0-9 feedback rating users from leaving negative feedbacks
too. But that's another story.
|
|
| Author: | Roxyncz | | Posted: | Jun 28, 2020 04:26 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60213-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 28533c01pb01 Red Boat, Hull Unitary 16 x 8 Base with Dark Bluish Gray Top with '60213' and Fire Logo Badge Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 60213 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part 892pb035 Light Bluish Gray Road Sign 2 x 2 Triangle with Clip with Car Falling into Water Pattern (Sticker) - Set 60213 (Counterpart)
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
South Africa, Western Cape
United Kingdom, England
Netherlands, Noord-Holland
)
)
Belgium
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Germany, Brandenburg
)
)
Canada, British Columbia
Czech Republic, Moravskoslezský Kraj
)
)
Italy, Lombardia
