Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | mr.misior  | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 18:37 | | Subject: | Re: holographic tile ID please | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, mr.misior writes:
| | could someone please tell me which set this belongs to.
the face is holographic and only visible at certain angle.
|
|
thank you!
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 18:17 | | Subject: | Re: holographic tile ID please | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mr.misior writes:
| | could someone please tell me which set this belongs to.
the face is holographic and only visible at certain angle.
|
|
| Author: | mr.misior | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 18:14 | | Subject: | holographic tile ID please | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| could someone please tell me which set this belongs to.
the face is holographic and only visible at certain angle.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jul 4, 2019 07:04 | | Subject: | Brand filters (again!) | | Viewed: | 153 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| The AFOL sets are not real LEGO sets, right?
Have they been catalogued incorrectly or are the filters not working correctly?
|
|
| Author: | Emperor_Penguin | | Posted: | Jun 29, 2019 14:58 | | Subject: | Remake the Hero Factory categories? | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Right now for the Hero Factory theme, there are 3 categories (Heroes,Villains,Vehicles).
I was wondering if each release wave theme could get its own sub-category (Breakout,
Brain Attack, Invasion from below, ETC...)
I can use the catalog add/change feature, just wondering if it should be done
first.
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2019 11:37 | | Subject: | Re: brown rotating box with part # 5483 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, clearingtoys writes:
| | In Catalog, dakotakidsshop writes:
| | looking for help figuring out what this is and what it is used for. part # non
it 5483 but dont seem to yield any results when searching that #.
|
Part 48316c01 from Set 4756
|
|
 |
| Author: | dakotakidsshop | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2019 11:18 | | Subject: | brown rotating box with part # 5483 | | Viewed: | 91 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| looking for help figuring out what this is and what it is used for. part # non
it 5483 but dont seem to yield any results when searching that #.
|
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 24, 2019 10:14 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
My dog, Chili, looks like just Dobby, so this is naturally going to be his new
nickname.
"The flesh Yoda is a bit Spicy"
I loooove it.
|
Chili dog.... I would call his leash the cheese whip lol
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 21:55 | | Subject: | Re: Does 970653-1 come apart? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| |
I got two of these in a set that will need its inventory updated. But I am trying
to figure it out. The part is inventoried but it doesn’t really look playable.
I gave it a soft tug to see if it was just clutched and I don’t think it is.
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 17:16 | | Subject: | Does 970653-1 come apart? | | Viewed: | 97 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| [p=970653-1]
I got two of these in a set that will need its inventory updated. But I am trying
to figure it out. The part is inventoried but it doesn’t really look playable.
I gave it a soft tug to see if it was just clutched and I don’t think it is.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 14:17 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
It’s as Michael (Hurt) posted, with missing print. I don’t think it’s “worn off”
too clean. It's not uncommon with earlier Lego modified heads produced in
China. It seems their QC was not on par with other production sites of TLG
-Cory
|
I've noticed their ink often doesn't take to their bendy heads. 9 years
of bustling between bricks and it's gone completely. If you look at the listings,
you'll see it's a common issue.
|
Whoa! That house elf appears to have suffered a stroke.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 14:09 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Adjour writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
My dog, Chili, looks like just Dobby, so this is naturally going to be his new
nickname.
"The flesh Yoda is a bit Spicy"
I loooove it.
|
Pics! Gotta have Chili pics!
|
|
| Author: | Adjour | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 13:40 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
My dog, Chili, looks like just Dobby, so this is naturally going to be his new
nickname.
"The flesh Yoda is a bit Spicy"
I loooove it.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 12:46 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| | In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
It’s as Michael (Hurt) posted, with missing print. I don’t think it’s “worn off”
too clean. It's not uncommon with earlier Lego modified heads produced in
China. It seems their QC was not on par with other production sites of TLG
-Cory
|
I've noticed their ink often doesn't take to their bendy heads. 9 years
of bustling between bricks and it's gone completely. If you look at the listings,
you'll see it's a common issue.
|
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 11:55 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
It’s as Michael (Hurt) posted, with missing print. I don’t think it’s “worn off”
too clean. It's not uncommon with earlier Lego modified heads produced in
China. It seems their QC was not on par with other production sites of TLG
-Cory
|
|
| Author: | ForTheGirls | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 10:59 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
| |
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
|
No, no eyeballs showing, just the lids. Thank you.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:49 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
1181
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
Thank you for your reply. The problem with my yoda is it has closed eyes. The
part you referenced has open eyes.
|
It's this one 100%. Almost all listings mention the eyes, or lack of
|
|
| Author: | Hurt | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:46 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Could also be this one (also because your picture looks more "Light Flesh" than
"Tan", but with the color on the eyes worn off:
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
1181
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
Thank you for your reply. The problem with my yoda is it has closed eyes. The
part you referenced has open eyes.
|
|
|
| Author: | ForTheGirls | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:35 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| | Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
1181
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
Thank you for your reply. The problem with my yoda is it has closed eyes. The
part you referenced has open eyes.
|
|
| Author: | cycbuild | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 09:24 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Subject: Flesh colored yoda, no markings
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
In Catalog, swoosh_factor writes:
|
Flesh colored yoda oh my god. This is f-ing amazing
|
| Author: | swoosh_factor | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 08:54 | | Subject: | Re: Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
In Catalog, ForTheGirls writes:
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog.
|
|
| Author: | ForTheGirls | | Posted: | Jun 23, 2019 08:44 | | Subject: | Flesh colored yoda, no markings | | Viewed: | 197 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| | Is this s legitimate LEGO head? I dont see it in the catalog. |
|
| Author: | Brick_Qc | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2019 20:00 | | Subject: | How many polybags in a 4561 set ? | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi, I just got a new opened 4561 with sealed polybags and I'd like to know
if it's complete. I have 8 polybags with pictures and one without containing
1x16 bricks.
TIA
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 04:58 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him  ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
I'd suggest it again, but seeing as I have done it once and it got done and
then changed back again later I don't see the point of going round in circles.
It should really drop the "The" as well - we don't have The Butcher, The
Plumber, etc.
|
So I've change it to be the same as minifig entry, but you know in the future
a new admin can change it back again 
|
Thanks, hopefully the dual name will stay. I know people use both.
Thanks also for correcting the spelling of ANTON'S tile.
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 03:48 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
Bricklink own parts list has the wrong part number. They have the left door not
the right door
JXC123. John
|
https://www.bricklink.com/CatalogItemInv.asp?S=6699-1
I see the right door in the inventory there.
|
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 01:42 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
Bricklink own parts list has the wrong part number. They have the left door not
the right door
JXC123. John
|
https://www.bricklink.com/CatalogItemInv.asp?S=6699-1
I see the right door in the inventory there.
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 01:29 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
Bricklink own parts list has the wrong part number. They have the left door not
the right door
JXC123. John
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2019 01:26 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| | In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 16:00 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
I'd suggest it again, but seeing as I have done it once and it got done and
then changed back again later I don't see the point of going round in circles.
It should really drop the "The" as well - we don't have The Butcher, The
Plumber, etc.
|
So I've change it to be the same as minifig entry, but you know in the future
a new admin can change it back again
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 15:25 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
I'd suggest it again, but seeing as I have done it once and it got done and
then changed back again later I don't see the point of going round in circles.
It should really drop the "The" as well - we don't have The Butcher, The
Plumber, etc.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 15:14 | | Subject: | Re: col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| |
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
|
I have no idea. last name change was done by Robert
(Nov 7, 2018 by StormChaser) and this change isn't in the log
So ask him ...if you have contact with him.
I really have no knowledge about it.
| |
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
|
for other to see it history
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReqList.asp?itemID=111573
| |
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
|
Have no idea.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 14:52 | | Subject: | col08-14 ACTOR | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
Is there a reason this keeps getting changed?
This set was originally listed as Actor, it was then changed to Thespian. I asked
for the Actor name to be reinstated, which it was, and then it was removed again.
The minifigure version has both names:
Why can the set not keep both names?
And on their webpages, LEGO refer to it as ACTOR. If it can have only one name,
then surely it should be the LEGO one.
https://www.lego.com/en-gb/themes/minifigures/products/lego-minifigures-8833
|
|
|
| Author: | Fynbos | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 11:13 | | Subject: | Cookie Cutters - bought in Billund - 853890 | | Viewed: | 124 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
I am unable to find in this catalogue the item I just bought in Billund:
5 cookie cuttters, LEGO 853890, item 6255877, EAN 673419306935.
Am I searching wrong or is this not yet listed here?
Thanks
Florian
|
|
| Author: | randyipp | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 00:34 | | Subject: | Re: Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JXC123 writes:
| | I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
What pictures show that?
|
|
|
| Author: | JXC123 | | Posted: | Jun 20, 2019 00:18 | | Subject: | Cycle Shop set 6699-1 | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I have downloaded the parts lists from many sources, incl blink and all seem
to include red door 73435c01 as the front door. Clearly the pictures show a need
for door 73436c01 not the one in the catalogue.
Has anyone else run into this - it has cost me 2 wrong door so far.
JXC 123. John
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 18, 2019 04:19 | | Subject: | Re: New part that doesn't exist without printing | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| | There's a new part I want to add to the catalog, and so far it only exists
with a printing on it. Is the proper procedure to add a sort of "placeholder"
entry for the actual new mold/part that has no printing, and then add the new
printed part that I have? I will upload a photo of the printed version I have,
but of course, cannot for the base part.
Thanks,
David
|
I believe you can only submit the printed part, as that is what exists.
|
|
| Author: | crazylegoman | | Posted: | Jun 17, 2019 20:35 | | Subject: | New part that doesn't exist without printing | | Viewed: | 107 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| There's a new part I want to add to the catalog, and so far it only exists
with a printing on it. Is the proper procedure to add a sort of "placeholder"
entry for the actual new mold/part that has no printing, and then add the new
printed part that I have? I will upload a photo of the printed version I have,
but of course, cannot for the base part.
Thanks,
David
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 17:07 | | Subject: | Re: Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| |
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
See
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?S=7735-1
Marek,
Each of these trains would then need 12 counterparts for each door.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 16:36 | | Subject: | Re: Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| |
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
Yes
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jun 15, 2019 16:32 | | Subject: | Other counterparts for set 7725-1? | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
|
Will you accept other counterparts (stickered doors) for this set? The sticker
sheet comes with many different railway names, and I have doors with "DSB" stickers.
/Jan
|
| Author: | run4ever | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 10:08 | | Subject: | Re: help to find a item | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In Catalog, run4ever writes:
| | Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
Thanks so much!!!
|
| Author: | brickconnector | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 06:58 | | Subject: | Re: How to add instruction weight? | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | Thank you, I could not have found it without help |
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 04:56 | | Subject: | Re: How to add instruction weight? | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, brickconnector writes:
| | I cannot add the weight of instruction book 8307-1. (177 grams). If I go to https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
which category should I choose?
Set | Part | Minifig | Book | Gear | Catalog
Whichever I choose it doesn't work.
|
Category sets https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=S in the top
field ("item no") enter the set number and enter the weight in grams in the field
"Change weight of instructions to."
|
|
| Author: | brickconnector | | Posted: | Jun 13, 2019 03:47 | | Subject: | How to add instruction weight? | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I cannot add the weight of instruction book 8307-1. (177 grams). If I go to https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp
which category should I choose?
Set | Part | Minifig | Book | Gear | Catalog
Whichever I choose it doesn't work.
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2019 14:33 | | Subject: | Re: help to find a item | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, run4ever writes:
| | Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
| Author: | run4ever | | Posted: | Jun 12, 2019 14:32 | | Subject: | help to find a item | | Viewed: | 84 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi guys!
I need to know the code of the part in the attached image!
Anyone can help me?
Thanks a lot!
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 18:46 | | Subject: | Re: adding something to the catalog | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, samsam2 writes:
| | Darn, I was about to help add these parts to the catalog, but the stickers are
not correct....
In Catalog, mjsheller writes:
| | Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
They were added but I rejected them due to this reason, stickers are wrongly
applied.
|
|
| Author: | samsam2 | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 18:37 | | Subject: | Re: adding something to the catalog | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Darn, I was about to help add these parts to the catalog, but the stickers are
not correct....
In Catalog, mjsheller writes:
| | Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 12:51 | | Subject: | Re: parts | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mikemuscar writes:
| | help I'm looking for parts. 1 what Lego digital designer calls mini alien
pet. 2 what Lego digital designer calls shell morning star. dose anyone
have this parts or know wat set they are in. also where if anywhere I can find
them in the studio program.
|
In LDD, look at the Part # / Design ID in the status line. Use that as a search
term. To catch patterned or composite parts, add a star.
“MINI ALIEN PET” = 95204, a search for “95204*” gives:
“SHELL - MORNING STAR” = 54177, a search for “54177” gives:
If you want both, add them in a Wanted List and then you can search stores (
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/buy.page ).
|
|
| Author: | mikemuscar | | Posted: | Jun 11, 2019 11:42 | | Subject: | parts | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| help I'm looking for parts. 1 what Lego digital designer calls mini alien
pet. 2 what Lego digital designer calls shell morning star. dose anyone
have this parts or know wat set they are in. also where if anywhere I can find
them in the studio program.
|
|
| Author: | mjsheller | | Posted: | Jun 9, 2019 14:57 | | Subject: | adding something to the catalog | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Set 8769 Visorak's Gate
I have piece 6082 and 6083 both with stickers applied. However to list them
in my store there is no number assigned to these pieces with stickers.
How do I go about asking for these two items to be added to your catalog?
Regards,
Josie
Carefree Building Blocks
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 13:20 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | Thanks each!
I didn't realize they HAD been added, as I kept searching for the numbers
I had given them as I made the addition form. I didn't know that the "approver"
would change them. That's good though!
|
They were needed a correction as they weren't properly numbered
| |
Miles (C0lsanders_)
In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
|
|
| Author: | C0lsanders_ | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 13:18 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thanks each!
I didn't realize they HAD been added, as I kept searching for the numbers
I had given them as I made the addition form. I didn't know that the "approver"
would change them. That's good though!
Miles (C0lsanders_)
In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
It depends if pending item is problematic or not.
| | And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
|
No messages are sended when item is approved. Correspondence with submitter is
only with problematic items (somtimes, firstly a note is added to pending item
in such cases - in item name like in this one for example [p=15068pb169x]) or
when they are rejected.
That is why submitters should check they "My activity page"
https://www.bricklink.com/myActivity.asp
or this page, section "My Additions Pending Approval:"
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogAdd.asp
Pending items can bee seen also here
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogPend.asp
You should check also this page where new additions to the catalog are showed
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?
Check this help page also
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2482
There are also answers to questions about pending items.
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 10:07 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
They were already approved on Monday if you're talking about these two.
[p=3068bpb1232]
[p=3068bpb1233]
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 09:19 | | Subject: | Re: First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, C0lsanders_ writes:
| | I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
I've requested two changes to listings in the past, both were approved really
quickly but I didn't get a message. If you click on "My Activity" from your
profile, you can see the requests you've made and how many have been approved.
|
|
| Author: | C0lsanders_ | | Posted: | May 29, 2019 08:50 | | Subject: | First time addition, how long | | Viewed: | 165 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I made 2 additions to the catalog the other day (2 tiles, from https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1141099).
How long is typical for them to be approved and added? And, can I perhaps expect
a message or some other notification that "your item has been added", or similar?
Thanks,
Miles (C0lsanders_)
|
|
| Author: | paulvdb | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 11:26 | | Subject: | Re: 62436c01pb01 - year released | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, aladar123 writes:
| | Hi,
I just have a 62436c01pb01 in my hands also its pair and both have 2006 as the
year on them. Do I have a different part or the catalog needs an update?
Thanks,
Tamas
|
The year on the part is the copyright year. The year in the Bricklink catalog
is when it was first included in a set. This is often a year later because of
the time it takes to design and then produce parts.
|
| Author: | mokibricks | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 10:11 | | Subject: | 62436c01pb01 - year released | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
I just have a 62436c01pb01 in my hands also its pair and both have 2006 as the
year on them. Do I have a different part or the catalog needs an update?
Thanks,
Tamas
|
|
| Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:33 | | Subject: | Re: Magnetic Dooku | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
Thanks for the quick response. I'll keep him as a desk decoration or make
a custom listing or something.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:19 | | Subject: | Re: Magnetic Dooku | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, novabrick writes:
| | Hi Guys.
We have a Count Dooku Clonewars figure
on a magnet from
It's only missing the lightsaber.
However different to the listing the minifig is permanently glued to the base
+ Torso to the Legs. Basically only Head arms and cape are removable.
|
| | Is there
a plan to include these glued Magnetfigs in the catalog?
|
No
| | Or is only the complete
set considered sellable.
Also there maybe should be added a notice to those sets in regards of being glued
or with lose minifigs.
Regards
Christian
novabrick-team
|
Here you have very good summarizing article about them
http://thebrickblogger.com/2011/06/glued-and-non-glued-lego-magnets/
|
|
| Author: | novabrick | | Posted: | May 27, 2019 04:12 | | Subject: | Magnetic Dooku | | Viewed: | 80 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi Guys.
We have a Count Dooku Clonewars figure
on a magnet from
It's only missing the lightsaber.
However different to the listing the minifig is permanently glued to the base
+ Torso to the Legs. Basically only Head arms and cape are removable. Is there
a plan to include these glued Magnetfigs in the catalog? Or is only the complete
set considered sellable.
Also there maybe should be added a notice to those sets in regards of being glued
or with lose minifigs.
Regards
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
| Author: | Classicsmiley | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 22:55 | | Subject: | Re: 11650c01 Vehicle Base sub-components | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| | I was wondering if anyone has attempted/managed to separate the joined sub-components
that make up this assembly. As far as I can tell on mine, doing this would cause
damage. I'm curious to know what the 'rivet-like' pins on the bottom
look like separated and whether they could serve another useful purpose on their
own. I would hazard a guess that it is stud diameter for a length of one plate-thickness
with a bar-size (or similar) hole in the center on the inside.
I presume there is no LEGO-published part number for the pin alone.
|
* | | 11650c01 Vehicle, Base 5 x 10 x 2 1/2 with Mudguards and 6 x 2 Recessed Center with 3 Holes with (Same Color) Wheels Holders Attached
Parts: Vehicle, Base |
|
|
| Author: | clrv4000 | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 22:49 | | Subject: | 11650c01 Vehicle Base sub-components | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I was wondering if anyone has attempted/managed to separate the joined sub-components
that make up this assembly. As far as I can tell on mine, doing this would cause
damage. I'm curious to know what the 'rivet-like' pins on the bottom
look like separated and whether they could serve another useful purpose on their
own. I would hazard a guess that it is stud diameter for a length of one plate-thickness
with a bar-size (or similar) hole in the center on the inside.
I presume there is no LEGO-published part number for the pin alone.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:45 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 109 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location:  USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
 |
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
I've changed the catalog note for both entries. See if that sounds better
to you.
|
|
| Author: | maninblack | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:42 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
Many years ago I managed to speak directly with a Lego engineer. I reported it
to Admin and for some time the description of the conversation was shown in the
Additional Notes for the part.
The slot is NOT intentional but is more a problem with the design of the part.
Whether a slot forms or not is down, mainly, to the age of the mold.
A redesign is not possible and it is considered to be such a minor flaw that
keeping things as they are is better than scrapping the part altogether.
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 13:27 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WhiteHorseMatt writes:
| | In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
Exactly my idea!
Maybe we should ask for a catalog change.
|
|
| Author: | WhiteHorseMatt | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 06:30 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tonnic writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
Yes, if you look from the inside, the hole is always moulded there. Sometimes
there is a thin skin over it. I think all my newer parts have the slot, with
older ones being hit and miss.
I believe the note on the part 'This part is occasionally found with a small
horizontal slot in the front near the base. This is believed to be an unintentional
feature.' is incorrect. Should be the other way round 'occasionally
found WITHOUT a small...'
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 05:26 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
|
You think the horizontal slot is a defect?
I believe, until Lego says otherwise, the slot is meant to be like this.
Out of all my 4070 at least 80% have a slot, no matter what year or color, no
matter what set it came from.
Too much for a defect.
It is a slot that is always the same form, sharply formed, very straight and
small.
I think it could be made for pressure relieve.
|
|
| Author: | seymour3113 | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 04:30 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Thank You
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
|
| Author: | hpoort | | Posted: | May 26, 2019 03:24 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
This is something we are going to look into. From what I have seen over the years,
there is no real "smooth slopes" for some of those parts (or any of them). What
they are are parts that come from molds where the sand-blasted texture has been
worn down over time making the slopes look more smooth than others that were
produced when the molds were new. One thing is for certain - none of them are
smooth like real smooth-molded slopes such as
Cheers,
Randy
|
Don't forget about versus with complete, intended smoothness
in the a-version.
Hans-Peter
|
|
| Author: | clrv4000 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:47 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| | In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| | In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint
balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with
such a piece. That's got me brainstorming...
|
Okayyyyy- now I see it! You may be right!
|
Sort of reminds me of this thing someone 3D printed:
https://www.myminifactory.com/de/object/3d-print-1l-lego-technic-liftarm-81004
Of course you wouldn't want to get THAT stuck in a 32474! (I occasionally
run into a similar 'homemade solution' when I find 1L axle stubs snapped
off of Bionicle detail parts in used LEGO batches. I had to drill a tiny center
hole and drive a fine screw into the bit to remove it on a couple occasions.)
|
|
| Author: | bb1237701 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:27 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, clrv4000 writes:
| | In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint
balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with
such a piece. That's got me brainstorming...
|
Okayyyyy- now I see it! You may be right!
|
|
| Author: | clrv4000 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:22 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, dkillgore writes:
| | In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
Speaking of Bionicle, you could have one of those common Technic ball-joint
balls (32474 or 53585) with just a stud sticking out the side when combined with
such a piece. That's got me brainstorming...
|
|
| Author: | bb1237701 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:11 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
So, no other numbers or marks anywhere on it?
Like others, I can see countless problems to solve with this but like others
before me, steer clear of Bionicles...looks suspiciously like Bionicle instead
of our endeared Technic
|
|
| Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 21:03 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
I *had* seen it, probably at the same time as the new 2x4 brick with axle holes
and that technic connector block...
But I can't find it so I probably noticed the part when I was looking at
new items pending approval in our catalog... 
|
|
| Author: | clrv4000 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 20:22 | | Subject: | Re: Mystery part | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| | I have pending approval something like this
[p=Unknown]
Did anybody see something like this? Anybody knows anything about it?
|
All I can say is that I really would like a part like that! I can already
think of some situations I could have solved easily with that. Hopefully some
sleuth can sort this out for us. Please keep us updated.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 18:15 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
This is something we are going to look into. From what I have seen over the years,
there is no real "smooth slopes" for some of those parts (or any of them). What
they are are parts that come from molds where the sand-blasted texture has been
worn down over time making the slopes look more smooth than others that were
produced when the molds were new. One thing is for certain - none of them are
smooth like real smooth-molded slopes such as
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 16:02 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| | In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
Why do you think that smooth slopes is not an appropriate entry? I actually prefer
textured slopes and when I order textured slopes and get smooth slopes it does
not make me happy.
|
|
| Author: | Brickitty | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 15:18 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| | Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
Thankfully, since there are so many headlight bricks with varying levels of partial
holes. It was definitely a manufacturing defect.
Now if we could just get rid of the ridiculous entries for "smooth slopes."
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:34 | | Subject: | Re: 4070a | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Yes, BL has decided not to differentiate between these.
In Catalog, seymour3113 writes:
| | I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
|
| Author: | seymour3113 | | Posted: | May 25, 2019 14:10 | | Subject: | 4070a | | Viewed: | 125 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I have several of these bricks (4070a). They are being deleted from catalog.
Should I just list them as 4070?
|
| Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | May 23, 2019 10:13 | | Subject: | Old Mosaic pieces. | | Viewed: | 113 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Can I ask what proof is required to submit the rectangular version of the 3062oldtile
?
I have both the one shown below and the rectangular version without stud that
I suppose would be something like 3005oldtile.
Not ready to list just yet but might want to do so sometime this year.
[p=3062oldtile]
|
|
| Author: | sheppy02 | | Posted: | May 22, 2019 06:40 | | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
|
There are 87 of the "set", whereas there are 4294 listings for the part. So most
people have listed them as the single part. The sealed ones listed as sets are
likely to be correct, as are the used ones listed as sets as they do not need
to contain the packaging (although the listing should say that).
If you have plenty of a single part set (or single minifigure set), it is often
a good idea to list some as the part (or minifigure) and some as the set, as
different buys will search for different things.
|
Thanks, that is very helpful
Alex
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | May 22, 2019 06:12 | | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
|
There are 87 of the "set", whereas there are 4294 listings for the part. So most
people have listed them as the single part. The sealed ones listed as sets are
likely to be correct, as are the used ones listed as sets as they do not need
to contain the packaging (although the listing should say that).
If you have plenty of a single part set (or single minifigure set), it is often
a good idea to list some as the part (or minifigure) and some as the set, as
different buys will search for different things.
|
|
| Author: | sheppy02 | | Posted: | May 22, 2019 05:58 | | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, NelisSolis writes:
| | In Catalog, sheppy02 writes:
| | Hello All,
I am just listing some items, I had one
[p=630-3]
trying to find the others in my inventory no joy, searched by brick separator
my others are listed
which are up for approx. 8 times the price. what is the difference? or are they
essentially the same products?
Thanks
Alex
|
the is a set (service pack) with only 1 part and the is the
part in that set.
|
Thanks Nelis,
Which is why my part didn't show up properly, most
people are listed as
whereas really they should be
Alex
|
|
| Author: | NelisSolis | | Posted: | May 22, 2019 05:50 | | Subject: | Re: which is the correct listing? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, sheppy02 writes:
| | Hello All,
I am just listing some items, I had one
[p=630-3]
trying to find the others in my inventory no joy, searched by brick separator
my others are listed
which are up for approx. 8 times the price. what is the difference? or are they
essentially the same products?
Thanks
Alex
|
the is a set (service pack) with only 1 part and the is the
part in that set.
|
|
| Author: | sheppy02 | | Posted: | May 22, 2019 05:40 | | Subject: | which is the correct listing? | | Viewed: | 113 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hello All,
I am just listing some items, I had one
[p=630-3]
trying to find the others in my inventory no joy, searched by brick separator
my others are listed
which are up for approx. 8 times the price. what is the difference? or are they
essentially the same products?
Thanks
Alex
|
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 17:11 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| | | But the reason we can't do that with the hinge brick is because Lego does
not issue the part as an assembly. They never have and likely never will.
|
LEGO doesn't issue BrickArms either but BrickLink has BrickArms on the website.
They never have and likely never will.
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 12:51 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 121 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
BrickLink
ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
| Location: USA, California |
| Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
| May 9, 2017 |
|
Admin |
|
|
| BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Catalog, mnementh writes:
| | In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Especially when considering the reason why it has been marked:
"This item was marked for deletion because it sets a precedent for adding
dozens of unnecessary combinations of hinges as assemblies to the catalog."
|
And meanwhile, we now have 14 recently created entries for mixed color 3937/
3738 Hinges.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3937c15#T=C
That decision goes directly AGAINST the catalog policy, so I deem those entries
to be stupid and unnecessary.
I believe keeping the 3830c01 single color combos is the right thing to do.
I dislike when admins forget that this is a COMMERCE website first and foremost
and does not exist to maintain a "pure" catalog.
3830c01 has been bought and sold THOUSANDS of times over the past 18 years and
it is clearly the preferred form for both buying and selling.
|
The decision to get rid of the brick hinge and add plate hinge had NOTHING to
do with any kind of purist notion. Rather, it was a decision based solely on
commercial concerns.
When a large portion of sellers list things as an assembly instead of the individual
parts, the listings are effectively split, meaning that for the part in question,
BrickLink's listing strength is diminished. What starts out as a well-meaning
idea based on someone's personal listing preferences then works its way through
the system as an ineffeciency, leading to more complicated wanted list assembly
and maintenance and a lot of missed hits from things like Easy Buy and traffic
that comes to us via Brickset and the Lego replacements parts website.
For that reason, we do not want assemblies in the catalog that have no good rationale
for their existence. The plate assemblies are very useful for sellers of used
parts because they don't have to pull the assemblies apart to list them.
The plate hinges break frequently when they are older.
The brick hinge, to my knowledge, does not break when disassembled. Neither is
it part of a larger class of items that can as a whole be treated as an assembly
- such as wheels and tires.
And lest people forget, this brick hinge assembly was completely removed from
inventories many years ago by Dan himself in what I believe to be was the first
step in decommissioning the entry altogether.
Regarding the idea that we could use the assembly *instead* of the individual
parts as the entry of choice on the site - this is kind of thinking that produced
this entry:
* | | 8c01 (Inv) Plate, Modified 2 x 2 with Wheel Holder Bottom with Red Wheel with Black Tire 14mm D. x 4mm Smooth Small Single (8 / 3464c01)
Parts: Aircraft |
It's just easier and simpler for everyone to use the assembly, and little
by little the assemblies are taking precedence over the individual parts in both
listings and sales.
But the reason we can't do that with the hinge brick is because Lego does
not issue the part as an assembly. They never have and likely never will. This
places a constraint on us, because we want to line up our catalog as much as
possible with the way bricks are treated by them. That way there is a smooth
pipeline through the supply chain. This is the same reason we started using multipacks:
|
|
| Author: | mnementh | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 11:34 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 89 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Especially when considering the reason why it has been marked:
"This item was marked for deletion because it sets a precedent for adding
dozens of unnecessary combinations of hinges as assemblies to the catalog."
|
And meanwhile, we now have 14 recently created entries for mixed color 3937/
3738 Hinges.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3937c15#T=C
That decision goes directly AGAINST the catalog policy, so I deem those entries
to be stupid and unnecessary.
I believe keeping the 3830c01 single color combos is the right thing to do.
I dislike when admins forget that this is a COMMERCE website first and foremost
and does not exist to maintain a "pure" catalog.
3830c01 has been bought and sold THOUSANDS of times over the past 18 years and
it is clearly the preferred form for both buying and selling.
.
|
|
| Author: | tons_of_bricks | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 06:48 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In protest of 3830c01 being marked for deletion I am not going to sell either
3830 or 3831 on BrickLink.
I sell used bricks, nearly all of these come to me as a complete hinge, in order
to sell them I must either sell them as a pair or manually separate them and
then list them separately.
I still don't understand why they were marked for deletion. There only single
colors in the catalog, no crossed colors, no decorated items. Nothing but plain
single colors.
I will sell them on other well known sites.
Cob
|
While this piece is being discussed, I have always found the name odd. It only
looks like a 1x4 hinge brick when it is paired together. Therefore if it is not
paired, then the parts are not a 1x4 brick. They look like 1x2 bricks with a
bit of modification.
LEGO refers to the individual pieces as a "hinge 1x2 upper part" or "lower part".
Which makes more sense when you are searching for it.
And in terms of setting a precedent:
|
I believe they have all those colored listings simple because of the difficulty
of taking those two pieces apart. I have broken several trying to do so. With
the 1x4 hinge brick, the pieces can come apart easily. I do not see the Cob's
problem at all. You make more money off of the two pieces if you sell them separately
than together. And it's only one listing more; not like it's a five piece
assembly you now have to disassemble. It's only two pieces.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 06:22 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In protest of 3830c01 being marked for deletion I am not going to sell either
3830 or 3831 on BrickLink.
I sell used bricks, nearly all of these come to me as a complete hinge, in order
to sell them I must either sell them as a pair or manually separate them and
then list them separately.
I still don't understand why they were marked for deletion. There only single
colors in the catalog, no crossed colors, no decorated items. Nothing but plain
single colors.
I will sell them on other well known sites.
Cob
|
While this piece is being discussed, I have always found the name odd. It only
looks like a 1x4 hinge brick when it is paired together. Therefore if it is not
paired, then the parts are not a 1x4 brick. They look like 1x2 bricks with a
bit of modification.
LEGO refers to the individual pieces as a "hinge 1x2 upper part" or "lower part".
Which makes more sense when you are searching for it.
And in terms of setting a precedent:
|
|
| Author: | WhiteHorseMatt | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 05:33 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, JusTiCe8 writes:
| | Especially when considering the reason why it has been marked:
"This item was marked for deletion because it sets a precedent for adding
dozens of unnecessary combinations of hinges as assemblies to the catalog."
Whereas it is impossible AFAIK to pick one color per sub-item (minifigs are defined
as "complete set", you can't pick one and choose other legs colour for instance).
In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In protest of 3830c01 being marked for deletion I am not going to sell either
3830 or 3831 on BrickLink.
I sell used bricks, nearly all of these come to me as a complete hinge, in order
to sell them I must either sell them as a pair or manually separate them and
then list them separately.
I still don't understand why they were marked for deletion. There only single
colors in the catalog, no crossed colors, no decorated items. Nothing but plain
single colors.
I will sell them on other well known sites.
Cob
|
|
Not saying it should be deleted, but that reason is valid. There are plenty
of sets where the two parts have different colours. Why would those combinations
not be available to buy?
|
|
| Author: | JusTiCe8 | | Posted: | May 20, 2019 05:20 | | Subject: | Re: Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 74 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Especially when considering the reason why it has been marked:
"This item was marked for deletion because it sets a precedent for adding
dozens of unnecessary combinations of hinges as assemblies to the catalog."
Whereas it is impossible AFAIK to pick one color per sub-item (minifigs are defined
as "complete set", you can't pick one and choose other legs colour for instance).
In Catalog, Cob writes:
| | In protest of 3830c01 being marked for deletion I am not going to sell either
3830 or 3831 on BrickLink.
I sell used bricks, nearly all of these come to me as a complete hinge, in order
to sell them I must either sell them as a pair or manually separate them and
then list them separately.
I still don't understand why they were marked for deletion. There only single
colors in the catalog, no crossed colors, no decorated items. Nothing but plain
single colors.
I will sell them on other well known sites.
Cob
|
|
|
| Author: | Cob | | Posted: | May 19, 2019 15:56 | | Subject: | Protest of 3830c01 marked for deletion | | Viewed: | 214 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| In protest of 3830c01 being marked for deletion I am not going to sell either
3830 or 3831 on BrickLink.
I sell used bricks, nearly all of these come to me as a complete hinge, in order
to sell them I must either sell them as a pair or manually separate them and
then list them separately.
I still don't understand why they were marked for deletion. There only single
colors in the catalog, no crossed colors, no decorated items. Nothing but plain
single colors.
I will sell them on other well known sites.
Cob
|
|
| Author: | iprice | | Posted: | May 16, 2019 09:50 | | Subject: | Re: Technic battery boxes | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SezaR writes:
| | In Catalog, iprice writes:
| | In Catalog, SezaR writes:
| | In Catalog, iprice writes:
This
is a set (not an item) consisting of the item
Indeed, 8881-1 is like a service pack. See the second photo.
|
I have compared the photos. To me they appear physically identical; I just wanted
to know if they were in effect the same - whether a "set" (of one item?) or a
component (one item) in a set!
I don't get the whole service pack thing. :/
|
One is the battery box and the other is the bag and its content (its content
is the same battery box) So if you open the bag and take off the battery box,
you will get the item
Not yet clear?
What is the difference between a package including a book (title: how to be happy)
and the book itself?
What is the differenc between
and
?
What is the difference between the train set
and the the "492 parts+2 minifigs+instructions" inside its box?
Bests,
Reza
|
Yeah, sorry I get what you mean. But to me that's not a service pack - that's
just an item within a packet. I'm used to product/software service packs,
that are more like upgrades to the original software, or additions to products
that improve the product and/or performance.
Thanks for the reply BTW.
|
|
| Author: | Hygrotus | | Posted: | May 15, 2019 06:39 | | Subject: | Re: Does part 6057 (Short Rigging) need a variant | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, 1974 writes:
| | Same thing with the large brown riggings
In Catalog, TorontoLego writes:
| | The four black ones and one brown one are about a plates width shorter. I can't
be the first one to notice this!
|
|
This one has a note from some time (I think it is a quite old note) and it is
on this list here
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2488
So for now the only thing which can be done here is do the same for this one
and also I will add it to the list.
As for now splitting old parts mold variants is on hold and as you can see this
list of mold variants not distinguished in the catalog is quite a long.
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | May 15, 2019 02:06 | | Subject: | Re: Technic battery boxes | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, iprice writes:
| | In Catalog, SezaR writes:
| | In Catalog, iprice writes:
This
is a set (not an item) consisting of the item
Indeed, 8881-1 is like a service pack. See the second photo.
|
I have compared the photos. To me they appear physically identical; I just wanted
to know if they were in effect the same - whether a "set" (of one item?) or a
component (one item) in a set!
I don't get the whole service pack thing. :/
|
One is the battery box and the other is the bag and its content (its content
is the same battery box) So if you open the bag and take off the battery box,
you will get the item
Not yet clear?
What is the difference between a package including a book (title: how to be happy)
and the book itself?
What is the differenc between
and
?
What is the difference between the train set
and the the "492 parts+2 minifigs+instructions" inside its box?
Bests,
Reza
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
United Kingdom, Wales
United Kingdom, England
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
)
)
Austria, Wien
Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador
Australia, New South Wales
Netherlands, Overijssel
Poland, w. Wielkopolskie
Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen
)
)
Denmark
Italy, Toscana
)
)
