Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Brickwilbo  | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2021 16:00 | | Subject: | Re: Feature suggestion: Apply Set | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, mpokhylets writes:
| | I'm reusing purchased lego sets for new projects. So when sourcing parts
for the wanted list, some of them are reused from the existing sets. Currently
I need to manually go through the inventory of the set and increase the number
of the available parts, which tedious and error-prone.
Would be nice if there would be an 'Apply Set' feature, similar to Apply
Order. Manually entering the set number would be ok.
|
Seems that Rebrickable.com does it.
|
 |
| Author: | mpokhylets | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2021 15:58 | | Subject: | Feature suggestion: Apply Set | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I'm reusing purchased lego sets for new projects. So when sourcing parts
for the wanted list, some of them are reused from the existing sets. Currently
I need to manually go through the inventory of the set and increase the number
of the available parts, which tedious and error-prone.
Would be nice if there would be an 'Apply Set' feature, similar to Apply
Order. Manually entering the set number would be ok.
|
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2021 11:22 | | Subject: | Re: Adress information clarification | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, CBricks1981 writes:
| | Hi,
As a seller I sometimes have trouble with deciphering some buyer adresses. Specifically
with international shipments to foreign countries I often need to contact the
buyer for what is what.
I was wondering if it would be possible if Bricklink could show something like
an adress template in the orders like mentioned below, so that it's clear
what is what instead it shows all the Adress info without clarification.
Jack Brick
Legolane 100b-2
12345 Legocity
Baseplateregion
Legoland
Name:Jack Brick
Street: Legolane
Housenumber: 100b
Appartment:
Floor: 2
Zipcode: 12345
City: Legocity
Region: Baseplateregion
Country: Legoland
Etc.....
With kind regards,
Chris
|
The address should be normalized, as to the standards of the postal authority
that handles the destination country. Having said that, there are a small number
of physical addresses in the USA that do not receive direct mail delivery. They
are instead given a free PO Box, and have to collect their mail there.
Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | Leftoverbricks | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2021 11:00 | | Subject: | Re: Adress information clarification | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, CBricks1981 writes:
| | Hi,
As a seller I sometimes have trouble with deciphering some buyer adresses. Specifically
with international shipments to foreign countries I often need to contact the
buyer for what is what.
I was wondering if it would be possible if Bricklink could show something like
an adress template in the orders like mentioned below, so that it's clear
what is what instead it shows all the Adress info without clarification.
Jack Brick
Legolane 100b-2
12345 Legocity
Baseplateregion
Legoland
Name:Jack Brick
Street: Legolane
Housenumber: 100b
Appartment:
Floor: 2
Zipcode: 12345
City: Legocity
Region: Baseplateregion
Country: Legoland
Etc.....
With kind regards,
Chris
|
Very much support this!
I run into this quite often. Not only here, but also on the other site.
It should not at all be difficult to program since what's displayed on your
screen is the value of a database field connected to it. Just add the name of
the field (perhaps modified to make it more understandable) as a label.
Most international shipments are now done by preparing a label on the website
of your shipping agency and they require exact information for many fields, which
are different from country to country.
Also: make a telephone number mandatory for buyers: I need to enter a
telephone number for shipments outside of the EU. For Postnl I can also enter
an email address but this may be different in other countries.
|
|
| Author: | CBricks1981 | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2021 10:38 | | Subject: | Adress information clarification | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hi,
As a seller I sometimes have trouble with deciphering some buyer adresses. Specifically
with international shipments to foreign countries I often need to contact the
buyer for what is what.
I was wondering if it would be possible if Bricklink could show something like
an adress template in the orders like mentioned below, so that it's clear
what is what instead it shows all the Adress info without clarification.
Jack Brick
Legolane 100b-2
12345 Legocity
Baseplateregion
Legoland
Name:Jack Brick
Street: Legolane
Housenumber: 100b
Appartment:
Floor: 2
Zipcode: 12345
City: Legocity
Region: Baseplateregion
Country: Legoland
Etc.....
With kind regards,
Chris
|
|
| Author: | tonnic | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2021 16:31 | | Subject: | Re: Please Approve Winnie the Pooh 21326 | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, starbeanie writes:
| | Inventory was just finalized today. Now it needs to be verified. This work is
all done by volunteers.
|
Don’t tell him, he knows, he is McGyver.
| |
Note: Inventory ready.
Added on Apr 14, 2021, Changed on Apr 20, 2021
In Suggestions, batman11223 writes:
| | Users have been waiting a month for this to be uploaded and approved.
Thankyou (:
|
|
|
|
| Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2021 16:28 | | Subject: | Re: Please Approve Winnie the Pooh 21326 | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Inventory was just finalized today. Now it needs to be verified. This work is
all done by volunteers.
Note: Inventory ready.
Added on Apr 14, 2021, Changed on Apr 20, 2021
In Suggestions, batman11223 writes:
| | Users have been waiting a month for this to be uploaded and approved.
Thankyou (:
|
|
|
| Author: | dcarmine | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2021 14:32 | | Subject: | Re: Refund amount should be seller amounts | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, cosmicray writes:
| | I just did a partial refund. It worked, but it was not intuitive.
To do the refund correctly, I had to reverse engineer the tax rate that was used
on the order. That tax rate is not currently disclosed, only the calculated
tax.
The seller should have nothing to do with calculating the sales tax to
do a refund. The seller should only enter the net value of items being refunded,
and the net value (if any) of the shipping being refunded. The sales tax calculation
mechanism should then calculate the correct sales tax part of the refund.
This is going to be a much larger concern once BL supports sales tax exemptions.
It will soon be a concern because of the peculiar way that some states (e.g.
Florida) determine when sales tax applies to shipping, and when it does not.
This is knowledge that the system has, and the seller (in a different state)
usually will not have.
Please make this much more seller friendly, and intuitive.
Nita Rae
|
Agreed! I was a bit over the top about this on this thread, but others had a
more rational discussion about it.
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=287150
Yes, it's done badly.
|
|
| Author: | Brick_Qc | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2021 21:20 | | Subject: | Re: Refund amount should be seller amounts | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, cosmicray writes:
| | I just did a partial refund. It worked, but it was not intuitive.
To do the refund correctly, I had to reverse engineer the tax rate that was used
on the order. That tax rate is not currently disclosed, only the calculated
tax.
The seller should have nothing to do with calculating the sales tax to
do a refund. The seller should only enter the net value of items being refunded,
and the net value (if any) of the shipping being refunded. The sales tax calculation
mechanism should then calculate the correct sales tax part of the refund.
This is going to be a much larger concern once BL supports sales tax exemptions.
It will soon be a concern because of the peculiar way that some states (e.g.
Florida) determine when sales tax applies to shipping, and when it does not.
This is knowledge that the system has, and the seller (in a different state)
usually will not have.
Please make this much more seller friendly, and intuitive.
Nita Rae
|
Tax collecting will be coming to Canada one day, so :
+1
|
|
| Author: | MrPetovan | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2021 21:20 | | Subject: | Re: Refund amount should be seller amounts | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| I fully agree with this, it's even pretty simple to do technically since
the opposite is done currently. Instead of removing tax from the full amount,
it could add tax to the part amount.
In Suggestions, cosmicray writes:
| | I just did a partial refund. It worked, but it was not intuitive.
To do the refund correctly, I had to reverse engineer the tax rate that was used
on the order. That tax rate is not currently disclosed, only the calculated
tax.
The seller should have nothing to do with calculating the sales tax to
do a refund. The seller should only enter the net value of items being refunded,
and the net value (if any) of the shipping being refunded. The sales tax calculation
mechanism should then calculate the correct sales tax part of the refund.
This is going to be a much larger concern once BL supports sales tax exemptions.
It will soon be a concern because of the peculiar way that some states (e.g.
Florida) determine when sales tax applies to shipping, and when it does not.
This is knowledge that the system has, and the seller (in a different state)
usually will not have.
Please make this much more seller friendly, and intuitive.
Nita Rae
|
|
|
| Author: | cosmicray | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2021 20:44 | | Subject: | Refund amount should be seller amounts | | Viewed: | 146 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I just did a partial refund. It worked, but it was not intuitive.
To do the refund correctly, I had to reverse engineer the tax rate that was used
on the order. That tax rate is not currently disclosed, only the calculated
tax.
The seller should have nothing to do with calculating the sales tax to
do a refund. The seller should only enter the net value of items being refunded,
and the net value (if any) of the shipping being refunded. The sales tax calculation
mechanism should then calculate the correct sales tax part of the refund.
This is going to be a much larger concern once BL supports sales tax exemptions.
It will soon be a concern because of the peculiar way that some states (e.g.
Florida) determine when sales tax applies to shipping, and when it does not.
This is knowledge that the system has, and the seller (in a different state)
usually will not have.
Please make this much more seller friendly, and intuitive.
Nita Rae
|
|
| Author: | dcarmine | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2021 14:18 | | Subject: | Separate "New price" from "New tiering price" | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| On the Mass Inventory Upload page, the first dropdown under "Consolidate Lots
By Using:" is:
New Price and New Tier Pricing
Can we get that separated into two dropdowns? I want to set a new price but leave
the old tier pricing.
Or maybe there can be a verify page, like the second page of parting out
a set, where I can see the current tier pricing and make the changes as needed
if the new price is lower than the current tier price?
Seller tool changes please?
Thanks for considering this.
Donna
|
|
| Author: | MrPetovan | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2021 12:37 | | Subject: | Re: Sort wanted lists by color after item name | | Viewed: | 16 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, hpoort writes:
| | As far as I could tell with my wanted list, setting the sort order to 'Item
Name' and clicking on [Search] actually sorts on 'Item Name, Color Name,
Wanted List Name' already.
However, when first going to the page (https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/search.page)
it says [Sort By] = 'Item name' as default selection, but actually the
sort order is still until you press the [Search] button.
|
I'm sorry, Im not using the Classic Wanted List Search page¹ which has the
correct sorting order displayed in the search form like you describe.
The problem lies exclusively with the New Wanted List Search page² which doesn't
display the sorting order before you actually search, and I can confirm parts
aren't sorted by Color after Item Name, see attached screenshots.
¹: https://www.bricklink.com/wantedSearch.asp?showOld=Y
²: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/search.page
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2021 13:25 | | Subject: | Re: 30598 | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
| | In Suggestions, starbeanie writes:
Not sure if you would know the answer but was there a reason for these to be
assigned rac## as the minifig ID rather than 30598##?
Every other 1-piece "minifig" I've seen was catalogued with the part number.
Would make them much easier to find.
|
I tried to have them assigned the part numbers, but the catalog admins would
not accept my requests.
|
|
| Author: | Brick.Door | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2021 13:19 | | Subject: | Re: 30598 | | Viewed: | 16 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, starbeanie writes:
Not sure if you would know the answer but was there a reason for these to be
assigned rac## as the minifig ID rather than 30598##?
Every other 1-piece "minifig" I've seen was catalogued with the part number.
Would make them much easier to find.
|
|
| Author: | hpoort | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2021 12:35 | | Subject: | Re: Sort wanted lists by color after item name | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, MrPetovan writes:
| | Gist: I'd like the "Item Name" sort order in the wanted list search to secondary
sort by Color Name, like "Color Name, Item Name" but flipped.
Reasoning: When I'm filling my wanted lists from my collection, I'm doing
it by Item Name because this is how my collection is sorted. However, it's
hard for me to see how many of a part in a single color I need since it seems
the secondary sorting order is by Wanted list name which is pretty random. As
a result, The same Elements (Part + Color) aren't grouped together and it's
somewhat inconvenient.
It's a small change for a small inconvenience.
|
As far as I could tell with my wanted list, setting the sort order to 'Item
Name' and clicking on [Search] actually sorts on 'Item Name, Color Name,
Wanted List Name' already.
However, when first going to the page (https://www.bricklink.com/v2/wanted/search.page)
it says [Sort By] = 'Item name' as default selection, but actually the
sort order is still until you press the [Search] button.
|
|
| Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2021 12:21 | | Subject: | Re: 30598 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| They aren't parts anymore, they are minifigs.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=M&catString=179.622
In Suggestions, Thisoldtoyhouse writes:
| | I am trying to add 30598, which is marked for deletion, due to the colors being
individually assigned part #'s. If you post that an item is going to be
deleted, due to this issue, then please supply the part #'s, on that page...ie:
30598, so that we can simply add the new part #'s to our inventory.
I cannot find the new part #'s assigned to this item in the various colors
that I currently have.
Can you help, please????
harry
ThisOldToyHouse
|
|
|
| Author: | Thisoldtoyhouse | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2021 12:13 | | Subject: | 30598 | | Viewed: | 64 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I am trying to add 30598, which is marked for deletion, due to the colors being
individually assigned part #'s. If you post that an item is going to be
deleted, due to this issue, then please supply the part #'s, on that page...ie:
30598, so that we can simply add the new part #'s to our inventory.
I cannot find the new part #'s assigned to this item in the various colors
that I currently have.
Can you help, please????
harry
ThisOldToyHouse
|
|
| Author: | MrPetovan | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2021 10:29 | | Subject: | Sort wanted lists by color after item name | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Gist: I'd like the "Item Name" sort order in the wanted list search to secondary
sort by Color Name, like "Color Name, Item Name" but flipped.
Reasoning: When I'm filling my wanted lists from my collection, I'm doing
it by Item Name because this is how my collection is sorted. However, it's
hard for me to see how many of a part in a single color I need since it seems
the secondary sorting order is by Wanted list name which is pretty random. As
a result, The same Elements (Part + Color) aren't grouped together and it's
somewhat inconvenient.
It's a small change for a small inconvenience.
|
|
| Author: | calebfishn | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2021 16:54 | | Subject: | Re: Monochrome Minifigures | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, BrickTobi writes:
| | Proposal for extension of the catalog.
I think there is a very big market for monochrome minifigures. So far, these
are considered custom items.
I would like to suggest establishing a separate category for monochrome minifigures
in the "standard version" of all colors.
For example "Minifigure Monochrome - white".
I look forward to your estimation and feedback
|
I vote no. These are custom items, and should be listed as custom items. You
can search for custom monochrome minifigs easily enough. People seem to be charging
big money for them too.
So please keep them out of the regular minifig listings.
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Netherlands, Gelderland
USA, Florida
Canada, Quebec
)
)
