Discussion Forum: Messages by Rick_S. (1301)
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

View Thread Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] and i've seen people use non-LEGO pieces in LEGO construction, should we add those in too ?
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] well then the error was on my behalf since I thought you meant to change it from plant to coral.
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] yes and no, the cups are not sold as parts (that I know of), just like this site sells boxes, but are not sold as parts.
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] no my point is we need to keep the plant name in.
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] yeah I always used the sprue from the gold coins to build up my gold horde in my customs and such.
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] I think this exact thing was argued over before, and was denied since it is not an official LEGO part or such thing, but not sure?
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] yeah but my insinuation is to not remove the plant name part.
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Sprues - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] The sprue is just a piece that held this part, it has no other function outside of that.
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] yes and on first impression i'd say it is a coral, but LEGO calls it a plant and considering LEGO owns this site and to keep part name continuation between sites [...]
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] I disagree since LEGO calls this part plant, so if people are looking for this part based on what LEGO has and has sold I'd be looking for plant, this is called part [...]
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] yeah but several things to consider, 1: LEGO calls this a plant, and whoever put the description plant thallus would have been more correct in the plant family since [...]
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] so only seen seaweed in one general location then ? let us take one example shall we, how about this type of red seaweed which a picture of it is enclosed, now tell me [...]
(46 months ago, Jul 2, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Coral part should not be in the Plant Section - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] haven't seen much seaweed before have you? :P
(46 months ago, Jul 1, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Darth Vader Head Mold Variance - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] think one on right is a chinese knock off.
(46 months ago, Jun 25, 2020, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] Yes buyer left neutral, but still does not excuse the negative left by the seller. and the way the rules are written the seller could do nothing about it. since the rules [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] Nope
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] ShakeyShuffle was a character.
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] While I do agree such a system would be useful it could also have drawbacks too.
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] Wrong again: it was negative, you notice the negative feedback they left for Sludgemonster? (URL) and it seems this seller is pretty notorious in not being a great seller [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] Actually there is no error, the synopsis is based on available data. but that is just one incident it still brings up the issue that retaliatory feedback cannot be removed [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] didn't read the suggestion did ya? the suggestion is to have the opportunity to have what is known as retaliatory feedback removed, this was brought about because [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] I'd disagree with that assumption, since right now the only negative feedback I have is as a buyer and I did deserve it I failed in my obligation to the seller. and [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] problem is it is not just bad buyers but bad sellers, my suggestion here was made because of a seller who left retaliatory feedback for a deserved negative they had received [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] Unfortunately such a system would not work well with the seller waiting for money till buyer receives item, sounds good in theory, but in practice not so well, one of [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Changing rules of feedback - Rick_S. (1301)
[...] I basically told him the same thing, but the core issue is the buyer has no recourse to get what is obviously retaliatory feedback removed. which brings into question [...]
(46 months ago, Jun 24, 2020, to Suggestions)

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More