Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | 1977_mauro  | | Posted: | Apr 21, 2024 03:43 | | Subject: | Re: differnces between parts | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog Identification | |
| But the wehere used list of the parts in sets does not work properly...
In Catalog Identification, Nubs_Select writes:
|
 |
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2024 03:53 | | Subject: | Re: what is max number of neutral and neg comment | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| Were all these 100 parts different?
if not, I would even pack 5000 into the same bag...
In Off Topic, Gambit57 writes:
| | I should have read the comments/feedback before buying from this one seller.
He left me a negative feedback after I left him a neutral one. Most of the comments
about him concerned his high price of shipping . My feedback to him was about
stuffing over 100 in two snack sized baggies. I tried talking to him but he is
very belligerent. Why does Bricklink still allow him to have a store
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 31, 2024 13:28 | | Subject: | Re: What is the worst set you'v ever parted out? | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | General | |
| I can remember... I have parted out this set as well.
I don't know if the odor came from this one or another one from the same
years, but is was clearly metallic odor that came out like in a factory...
In General, popsicle writes:
| | In General, JimsBricks writes:
| | Hey All
I hope your all well today, ive been doing some parting out for before i list
them,
working on the star wars 75345 * 100, the first bag 30 very easy, BUT Then the
smaller bag, 74 parts, it just seemed a long part out process.
Have you ever found a set you didnt enjoy parting out?
I hope you all have a great day
Jim
|
What a good question, Jim!
Had to give it some thought as we've done a hell of a lot of set partouts
over the years. Back in our heyday of volume set breakdowns, we got in a few
cases of...
that had a very strange odor to them It was a unique and off-putting
odor. To this day, I've no idea what was going on with those sets, but not
an enjoyable partout session, to say the least...
-popsicle
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 30, 2024 14:31 | | Subject: | Re: EU Right of Withdrawal | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Help | |
| | | if you do not like the quality of the goods, you can return them to the retailer
for any reason. this is normal day-to-day business in europe.
|
-- New LEGO bricks are commodieties, not more, not less, what do you mean
by the quality?
Reading your messages so far one could mean that you sent the package back for
no reason.
Mauro
In Help, Bibosstone writes:
| | In Help, crazylegoman writes:
| | I think you need to provide another piece of information for people to understand
the situation better: Why did you order something and then send it back? Was
the order damaged or incomplete?
David
|
please understand that as a consumer you have extensive rights in europe.
if you do not like the quality of the goods, you can return them to the retailer
for any reason. this is normal day-to-day business in europe.
but sometimes there are dealers who do not like this. the only thing i want to
discuss here is the "Non-Paying Buyer Alert system" has been abused by
the dealer and what i can do about it and this is a problem for all buyers from
Europe if they buy from European dealers.
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 29, 2024 01:30 | | Subject: | Re: My little brother... | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
| | Very, very nice environement to relax and spend time. |
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 22, 2024 00:15 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 21330-1 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 9 Part 76959 Reddish Brown Slope, Inverted 45 2 x 2 with Hollow Round Bottom Tube (Alternate)
* Change 9 Part Reddish Brown 3660 Slope, Inverted 45 2 x 2 with Flat Bottom Pin {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
From a sealed set.
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 19, 2024 11:42 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 11038-1 | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 38320 White Pane for Window 1 x 2 x 2 Lattice Diamond (Extra)
Comments from Submitter:
I missed this one during the inventorization process.
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 14, 2024 08:44 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 45345-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 6 Part 44865 Red Brick, Modified 1 x 2 with Pin and Bottom Stud Holder (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 6 Part Red 2458 Brick, Modified 1 x 2 with Pin {match ID 0 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
From a sealed set.
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 4, 2024 10:07 | | Subject: | Re: Variant merge - clarification 553b/c | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Agree to that. Does not make any sense from the timeline perspective as well.
The blocked variant was at the beginning, during the vented variant has been
introduced lately. The intermediate hollow stud variant timeline was between
them but now it is fully covered by the timeline of the blocked / vnted variant
timeline.
Mauro
P.S: The same applies to minifigure, heads.
In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | Hello,
[p=553b]
I see that the old 553b Blocked Stud has been merged with the much newer 3626
Vented Stud.
Was I wrong in expecting that it was also to be merged with 553c Hollow Stud?
Wasn't the point to not have to differentiate between the different stud
types?
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 4, 2024 08:11 | | Subject: | Re: What would you do? | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Shipping | |
| if you cen send cheaper, reduce the costs a little bit, if not refuse it...
In Shipping, fallinglegos81 writes:
| | Good Morning Forum,
I had a customer reach out asking if I could reduce my shipping before purchasing
a set. I only do instant check out and not invoices. I explained in the email
that the shipping cost is what I believe is a fair price and I don't reduce
shipping. I told him thank you for his interested.
He never wrote back but a day later they purchased the item he had emailed about
and in the comments "Hi. Can you please reduce shipping cost a few dollars
to reflect ups advantage which is cheaper? Thanks!" after I already told
him no and after he had paid.
I don't want to be petty but I'm annoyed that I told them no and ignored
it.
What would you do?
Thanks!
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 3, 2024 15:27 | | Subject: | Re: Restore grooved variants 44302a/b | | Viewed: | 104 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Secret society of inventory suppliers 
In Catalog, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Nope
Inventory Supplier Program
|
No idea what that is, sorry.
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 3, 2024 15:13 | | Subject: | Re: Restore grooved variants 44302a/b | | Viewed: | 92 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Nope
Inventory Supplier Program
True, it is impossible and would have to be done manually
In Catalog, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Catalog, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Fully support you Jen.
Please restore it. This is not the position of some readers here but the position
of majority if not of all ISP members.
|
Internet Service Providers???
Note: I think restoration is impossible for the lots in Shops; some sellers having
already merged them.
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 3, 2024 13:56 | | Subject: | Re: Restore grooved variants 44302a/b | | Viewed: | 95 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Fully support you Jen.
Please restore it. This is not the position of some readers here but the position
of majority if not of all ISP members.
Thanks Mauro
In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | Hello,
From everything I have read here, the merging of 44302a/b was outside of what
the variant merge was intended to do. I don't care whether it was an oversight
or a misjudgement or just a mistake. Let's everyone take a breath here and
just work toward fixing this.
44302a and 44302b were grooved variants. This catalog still supports grooved
variants. BrickLink, please restore this change.
Thank you,
~Jen
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2024 13:44 | | Subject: | Re: Add alternate number 5711 for part 41747 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I know the number for the left one but it was NOT included in the set.
The reason? Perhaps to save some costs leaving out the support on inner sides?
In Catalog Requests, here4bricks614 writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | In the set:
a new version of right wedge 41747 appeared (but not for the left one)
The new part 5711 at the front in the comparison photo has no supports on the
inner sides like the older part has (at the back we can see the old version for
the left wedge)
Thansk Mauro
|
New left shell has part number 5830.
What was the point of introducing a new mold for a perfectly fine part?
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Mar 1, 2024 06:28 | | Subject: | Add alternate number 5711 for part 41747 | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| In the set:
a new version of right wedge 41747 appeared (but not for the left one)
The new part 5711 at the front in the comparison photo has no supports on the
inner sides like the older part has (at the back we can see the old version for
the left wedge)
Thansk Mauro
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Feb 15, 2024 06:57 | | Subject: | Re: Full Variant List | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I usually take care on variants which exist in BL catalogue.
Now with the newest odd variants merge, I am unsure how I proceed.
I will at the moment still differentiate them on my own but in the future I would
rather go in line with the BL catalogue again.
In Catalog, enig writes:
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Feb 15, 2024 06:40 | | Subject: | Re: Full Variant List | | Viewed: | 65 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| https://www.bricklink.com/catalogRel.asp
In Catalog, enig writes:
| | I feel silly asking for this but can someone please refer me to a page or a forum
post with a full list of parts that have variants.
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Feb 14, 2024 12:06 | | Subject: | Re: Variants Thread - February 12 | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| +1
In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
Just to add my opinion to this conversation. The reality is that...
| | The 2454 and 46212 do not both exist in transparent colors:
[p=46212,12]
|
...yet. If tomorrow LEGO decides to make a solid color 46212 (or vice versa),
we will be forced to split 2454 back into two listings. Their functional differences
are significant.
Just because the transparent color use makes this easy to differentiate at the
moment, it doesn't mean we count on it being that way.
Thanks,
~Jen
| |
The only reason to keep them separate is to distinguish the early solid color
versions which had no side supports. But that is a minor consideration and practically
speaking there is no functional difference.
You would also be hard pressed to say that any of those early sets came ONLY
with the earliest version of the part. Both types are correct, and maybe there
were both types present in some copies.
As for people needing to place 1 x 1 round tiles inside the 46212, this only
happens with the transparent version.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Feb 14, 2024 01:22 | | Subject: | Re: Differenzbesteuerung | | Viewed: | 75 times | | Topic: | LANG Deutsch | |
| Das ist Quatsch. Dann müsstest ja die Steine von jedem Einkauf separat lagern.
Ein Bäcker muss auch nicht nachweisen, ob das Mehl aus Sack 1 oder 2 kommt, das
zum Brötchenbacken verwendet wurde, wenn Sack 1 und Sack 2 exakt die gleiche
Qualität hat.
Ähnlich ist es mit LEGO Steinen, die sind eine Art Commmodity und beliebig austauschbar
gegen einen gleichförmigen und gleichfarbigen Stein aus einem anderem Set.
In LANG Deutsch, Steineparadies writes:
| | Hallo Mauro,
vielen Dank für deine Nachricht.
Es ist, wie du beschrieben hast. Ich dokumentiere genau, was unser Eingang ist.
Kaufdatum, Gewicht, Preis, KG/Preis und die Adresse vom Verkäufer.
Aber angeblich muss ich dokumentieren, woher aus welchem Einkauf ein Stein stammt;
wenn du z. B. einen Stein 3005 in Blau bei uns kaufen würdest, muss ich nachweisen,
aus welchem Einkauf dieser stammt.
Neuer Steuerberater macht scheinbar Sinn.
In LANG Deutsch, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Normal kauft man ja Sets ein, das ist der Eingang, dann verkauft man die Steine
daraus, das ist der Ausgang.
Was heißt, der Steuerberater akzeptiert dein Vorgehen nicht? Wird er vom Staat
bezahlt, oder von dir?
Ich würde knallhart den Steuerberater wechseln.
Außer, du hast ein anderes Vorgehen, als oben beschrieben.
Grüße Mauro
In LANG Deutsch, Steineparadies writes:
| | Guten Morgen zusammen.
Ich würde gerne in Erfahrung bringen, wie Ihr die Differenzbesteuerung bei Gebrauchtwaren
ansetzt.
Unser Finanzamt sowie mein Steuerberater akzeptieren mein Vorgehen nicht.
Ich wollte Konto A gegen Konto B rechnen.
Nun soll ich genau aufzeichnen, woher ich welchen Stein habe und zu welchem Preis
ich diesen eingekauft habe. WTF, wie soll ich das anstellen? Es gibt einige,
die die Diff anwenden. Wie ist es bei euch?
|
|
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
