Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 16:08 | Subject: | Re: Extra part in inventory without base entry | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| This (at least this instance) refers to the inventory for set 41453-1.
I see an extra item for p/n 85861 in white, with no corresponding base part entry.
Is this in reality an optional part, or is this an additional part for something
that is in a sub-inventory (e.g. a minifig) ?
Enquiring minds, etc.
Nita Rae
|
It's used in
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?M=uni07
|
Thank you. That reveals another shortcoming in the BL implementation. That being
that, while you may be able to see that on the HTML web page display (assuming
you can click something that expands the sub-inventories), there is no option
to do likewise on the XML download of the set inventory. All I get in the XML
file is a flat rendering of the basic set inventory. It doesn’t reveal that this
part was an extra assigned to the minifig (which we can’t do in the inventory
section of the catalog, because that might imply that every sale of the minifig
comes with the extra).
In one sense it would be nice (I suspect) if extras were matched to the
item they are extra to, just like alternates are (but at the same time not trying
to say they are an alternate because they are not).
|
Extras _are_ matched to the item they are extra to. They are extra parts to the
set. That is how TLC defines them. They are not extra parts to a minifigure.
A minifigure is an assembly defined by BrickLink, and it should have no bearing
on the set that contains it. Basically, it is just another counterpart like all
other assemblies that are defined in the Counterparts section. Unfortunately,
the BrickLink system treats the minifigure assemblies as special items and all
of that needs to be changed. But the Sun may have gone supernova before that
ever happens.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 08:42 | Subject: | Re: Extra part in inventory without base entry | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Ber_i writes:
| Set view to "break minifigure", and all the parts of the figs are shown
as set-inventory
|
Which is fine (as I suggested) but does not propagate to the XML inventory download.
Nita Rae
|
Author: | Ber_i | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 08:41 | Subject: | Re: Extra part in inventory without base entry | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Set view to "break minifigure", and all the parts of the figs are shown
as set-inventory
|
|
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 08:00 | Subject: | Re: Extra part in inventory without base entry | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| This (at least this instance) refers to the inventory for set 41453-1.
I see an extra item for p/n 85861 in white, with no corresponding base part entry.
Is this in reality an optional part, or is this an additional part for something
that is in a sub-inventory (e.g. a minifig) ?
Enquiring minds, etc.
Nita Rae
|
It's used in
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?M=uni07
|
Thank you. That reveals another shortcoming in the BL implementation. That being
that, while you may be able to see that on the HTML web page display (assuming
you can click something that expands the sub-inventories), there is no option
to do likewise on the XML download of the set inventory. All I get in the XML
file is a flat rendering of the basic set inventory. It doesn’t reveal that this
part was an extra assigned to the minifig (which we can’t do in the inventory
section of the catalog, because that might imply that every sale of the minifig
comes with the extra).
In one sense it would be nice (I suspect) if extras were matched to the
item they are extra to, just like alternates are (but at the same time not trying
to say they are an alternate because they are not).
Nita Rae
|
|
Author: | BricksThatStick | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 07:37 | Subject: | Re: Extra part in inventory without base entry | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| This (at least this instance) refers to the inventory for set 41453-1.
I see an extra item for p/n 85861 in white, with no corresponding base part entry.
Is this in reality an optional part, or is this an additional part for something
that is in a sub-inventory (e.g. a minifig) ?
Enquiring minds, etc.
Nita Rae
|
It's used in
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?M=uni07
|
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 07:25 | Subject: | Extra part in inventory without base entry | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| This (at least this instance) refers to the inventory for set 41453-1.
I see an extra item for p/n 85861 in white, with no corresponding base part entry.
Is this in reality an optional part, or is this an additional part for something
that is in a sub-inventory (e.g. a minifig) ?
Enquiring minds, etc.
Nita Rae
|
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Jun 2, 2023 07:21 | Subject: | Re: P/N 30179 with yellow door tr-lt-blue glass | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| […]
It's in the inventory for this set.
Hope that explains things.
|
The subject is the counterpart / combo for {30179 + x39c01}. There’s several
30179cxx, but not with x39c01 in Yellow.
|
There likely never will be, either, unless TLG decide to do a rerelease of 6434-1
which I highly doubt would ever happen as it's from a bygone era.
The yellow door at the time of it's original release happened to fit the
color scheme of the era the sets were going through, nowadays, it's all color
coordinated and we know a lot more about the parts numbering scheme TLG uses
internally.
If there ever is a need for that particular yellow door in a set design, perhaps
they would reuse it, although given their color palette now, I'd expect it
would turn up in some shade of yellow.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
I guess this open up (again) the eternal question … Is it better (or more correct)
to list the two individually and linked together as a superlot, or to create
a unique catalog entry for the combo. It is existential in one sense. I’m curious
if there are ground floor reasons that suggest one over the other (and this same
subject somewhat also applies to wheels and tyres).
Nita Rae
|
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | Jun 1, 2023 14:32 | Subject: | Re: P/N 30179 with yellow door tr-lt-blue glass | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| […]
It's in the inventory for this set.
Hope that explains things.
|
The subject is the counterpart / combo for {30179 + x39c01}. There’s several
30179cxx, but not with x39c01 in Yellow.
|
There likely never will be, either, unless TLG decide to do a rerelease of 6434-1
which I highly doubt would ever happen as it's from a bygone era.
The yellow door at the time of it's original release happened to fit the
color scheme of the era the sets were going through, nowadays, it's all color
coordinated and we know a lot more about the parts numbering scheme TLG uses
internally.
If there ever is a need for that particular yellow door in a set design, perhaps
they would reuse it, although given their color palette now, I'd expect it
would turn up in some shade of yellow.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 31, 2023 21:07 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| I've tried a couple of times to set myself to this task but there are so
many gray images and (seriously, I am not making this up...) I dislike the old
grays.
|
Wait... What?!? 😵
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 31, 2023 20:44 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, macebobo writes:
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| I dislike the old grays.
|
But, but, it is in your store name!
|
Then I guess this is why she's selling them?
|
Author: | macebobo | Posted: | May 31, 2023 20:20 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| I dislike the old grays.
|
But, but, it is in your store name!
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | May 31, 2023 19:33 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
|
I wish that was the way it worked, but we both know that it is not. These are
the images in the colors that djklitz mentioned that used to be the catalog
images. They were clear renders, and the colors were spot on. These 3 images
were replaced by the current ones that cause problems.
David
|
Ouch! Yes, at some point the BL office dumped all our line-drawn images for part
renders. They decided to trade people complaining that our images were too small
for people complaining about the color of our images. What can we do?
We are still free to correct and upload images. The community still can improve
our catalog.
The old grays are a problem for sure. Those of us who spend time recoloring renders
(of which randyf is our fearless leader) tend to focus on getting new parts and
colors done and less on the vintage stuff.
I've tried a couple of times to set myself to this task but there are so
many gray images and (seriously, I am not making this up...) I dislike the old
grays.
Take care,
~Jen
|
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | May 31, 2023 17:22 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| Anyone out there is more than welcome to submit improved images. It is a community-built
database, so the community can fix things that they see need fixing.
Improved images may be uploaded here:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=P
Cheers,
Randy
P.S. One suggestion I would give you is to sort your lists by _color_ instead
of by part name. That way, all dark gray parts get lumped together and all light
gray parts get lumped together. It helps tremendously with the inventorying process.
|
I wish that was the way it worked, but we both know that it is not.
|
And why is that, pray tell? I am in the position to handle these things, so I
believe I know what I am talking about.
|
Because I wish that superior images replaced inferior images, and never the reverse.
| | These are
the images in the colors that djklitz mentioned that used to be the catalog
images. They were clear renders, and the colors were spot on. These 3 images
were replaced by the current ones that cause problems.
|
They were replaced because _all_ of the old 80 x 60 pixel thumbnail images were
replaced with larger images. At that time, the LEGO renders were chosen as the
default. Not my decision or that of any of the other volunteer admins.
|
I believe that replacing all the old images was a bad decision. I'm not
saying you specifically did it. I honestly don't know what individual or
group was responsible, but I do know that it has led to the trouble that this
thread's initiator experienced.
What a pompous question. You know exactly how to look up all of the catalog
images that I have contributed. I appreciate your many contributions to the
catalog, but I don't think that their vast number is a valid excuse to be
condescending to anyone.
David
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 31, 2023 16:29 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog Requests, djklitz writes:
| I've noticed a lot of light gray pieces appear dark gray in color as well
as dark gray pieces appearing light gray. I've been making several mistakes
inventorying sets because I am glancing at the photo and may forget to fully
read the description. When doing so many sets at once it can be easy to overlook
occasionally.
Attached is two examples.
One of set 5958 - Mummy's Tomb when sorting by Item Name. The dark gray slope
looks very light gray.
Also in 5988, two of the light gray parts could easily be mistaken as dark gray.
However, there are many cases of other parts specifically with dark vs light
gray.
It would be awesome to adjust these as I am sure I am not the only one who's
made this mistake. Could we fix these default images to be more representative
of their actual color?
Thanks!
|
Anyone out there is more than welcome to submit improved images. It is a community-built
database, so the community can fix things that they see need fixing.
Improved images may be uploaded here:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=P
Cheers,
Randy
P.S. One suggestion I would give you is to sort your lists by _color_ instead
of by part name. That way, all dark gray parts get lumped together and all light
gray parts get lumped together. It helps tremendously with the inventorying process.
|
I wish that was the way it worked, but we both know that it is not.
|
And why is that, pray tell? I am in the position to handle these things, so I
believe I know what I am talking about.
| These are
the images in the colors that djklitz mentioned that used to be the catalog
images. They were clear renders, and the colors were spot on. These 3 images
were replaced by the current ones that cause problems.
|
They were replaced because _all_ of the old 80 x 60 pixel thumbnail images were
replaced with larger images. At that time, the LEGO renders were chosen as the
default. Not my decision or that of any of the other volunteer admins. However,
users _are_ free to adjust the colors of the renders and upload them if they
think they are better. I have personally done this on over 9000 images in the
catalog.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?pg=1&imgID=169230&v=2
How many have you done?
Randy
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 31, 2023 16:17 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks, both figures now working fine and correct parts.
In Catalog, LEGOfan1138 writes:
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Is it possible to replace battery in lightsaber minifigures without damaging
them ?
Does the hood normally come off as the rest of the figure appears fixed, what
colour should it be ?
I have an sw0137 that fails to light
|
Take the non saber arm off then pry the back off through the arm-hole with a
small screwdriver. Any head accessory should come off. In this case it’s a reddish
brown hood.
|
|
|
Author: | LEGOfan1138 | Posted: | May 31, 2023 15:56 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Is it possible to replace battery in lightsaber minifigures without damaging
them ?
Does the hood normally come off as the rest of the figure appears fixed, what
colour should it be ?
I have an sw0137 that fails to light
|
Take the non saber arm off then pry the back off through the arm-hole with a
small screwdriver. Any head accessory should come off. In this case it’s a reddish
brown hood.
|
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | May 31, 2023 15:18 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog Requests, djklitz writes:
| I've noticed a lot of light gray pieces appear dark gray in color as well
as dark gray pieces appearing light gray. I've been making several mistakes
inventorying sets because I am glancing at the photo and may forget to fully
read the description. When doing so many sets at once it can be easy to overlook
occasionally.
Attached is two examples.
One of set 5958 - Mummy's Tomb when sorting by Item Name. The dark gray slope
looks very light gray.
Also in 5988, two of the light gray parts could easily be mistaken as dark gray.
However, there are many cases of other parts specifically with dark vs light
gray.
It would be awesome to adjust these as I am sure I am not the only one who's
made this mistake. Could we fix these default images to be more representative
of their actual color?
Thanks!
|
Anyone out there is more than welcome to submit improved images. It is a community-built
database, so the community can fix things that they see need fixing.
Improved images may be uploaded here:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=P
Cheers,
Randy
P.S. One suggestion I would give you is to sort your lists by _color_ instead
of by part name. That way, all dark gray parts get lumped together and all light
gray parts get lumped together. It helps tremendously with the inventorying process.
|
I wish that was the way it worked, but we both know that it is not. These are
the images in the colors that djklitz mentioned that used to be the catalog
images. They were clear renders, and the colors were spot on. These 3 images
were replaced by the current ones that cause problems.
David
|
|
|
Author: | djklitz | Posted: | May 31, 2023 14:34 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Oh awesome thank you I did not realize there was a self-submittal process or
I would have started there. I was directed to come here from bricklink support.
And yes - sorting by color helps avoid this mistake. Unfortunately my parts are
sorted by type so when I am doing plates - I get all the plates of all the colors
I need etc. Then I have everything organized alphabetically as bricklink displays
them so I can, usually, get things done more quickly.
In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog Requests, djklitz writes:
| I've noticed a lot of light gray pieces appear dark gray in color as well
as dark gray pieces appearing light gray. I've been making several mistakes
inventorying sets because I am glancing at the photo and may forget to fully
read the description. When doing so many sets at once it can be easy to overlook
occasionally.
Attached is two examples.
One of set 5958 - Mummy's Tomb when sorting by Item Name. The dark gray slope
looks very light gray.
Also in 5988, two of the light gray parts could easily be mistaken as dark gray.
However, there are many cases of other parts specifically with dark vs light
gray.
It would be awesome to adjust these as I am sure I am not the only one who's
made this mistake. Could we fix these default images to be more representative
of their actual color?
Thanks!
|
Anyone out there is more than welcome to submit improved images. It is a community-built
database, so the community can fix things that they see need fixing.
Improved images may be uploaded here:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=P
Cheers,
Randy
P.S. One suggestion I would give you is to sort your lists by _color_ instead
of by part name. That way, all dark gray parts get lumped together and all light
gray parts get lumped together. It helps tremendously with the inventorying process.
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 31, 2023 14:29 | Subject: | Re: Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, djklitz writes:
| I've noticed a lot of light gray pieces appear dark gray in color as well
as dark gray pieces appearing light gray. I've been making several mistakes
inventorying sets because I am glancing at the photo and may forget to fully
read the description. When doing so many sets at once it can be easy to overlook
occasionally.
Attached is two examples.
One of set 5958 - Mummy's Tomb when sorting by Item Name. The dark gray slope
looks very light gray.
Also in 5988, two of the light gray parts could easily be mistaken as dark gray.
However, there are many cases of other parts specifically with dark vs light
gray.
It would be awesome to adjust these as I am sure I am not the only one who's
made this mistake. Could we fix these default images to be more representative
of their actual color?
Thanks!
|
Anyone out there is more than welcome to submit improved images. It is a community-built
database, so the community can fix things that they see need fixing.
Improved images may be uploaded here:
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogImageAdd.page?itemType=P
Cheers,
Randy
P.S. One suggestion I would give you is to sort your lists by _color_ instead
of by part name. That way, all dark gray parts get lumped together and all light
gray parts get lumped together. It helps tremendously with the inventorying process.
|
|
Author: | djklitz | Posted: | May 31, 2023 14:22 | Subject: | Dark Gray vs Light Gray part photos | Viewed: | 96 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I've noticed a lot of light gray pieces appear dark gray in color as well
as dark gray pieces appearing light gray. I've been making several mistakes
inventorying sets because I am glancing at the photo and may forget to fully
read the description. When doing so many sets at once it can be easy to overlook
occasionally.
Attached is two examples.
One of set 5958 - Mummy's Tomb when sorting by Item Name. The dark gray slope
looks very light gray.
Also in 5988, two of the light gray parts could easily be mistaken as dark gray.
However, there are many cases of other parts specifically with dark vs light
gray.
It would be awesome to adjust these as I am sure I am not the only one who's
made this mistake. Could we fix these default images to be more representative
of their actual color?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 31, 2023 13:07 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | Yep, we have no less than 85 new sets that will be released tomorrow.
|
Sounds like lots of fun!
|
|
Author: | EnchantedBricks | Posted: | May 31, 2023 11:05 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
Congrats!!
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 31, 2023 10:07 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks everyone!
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
|
Yep, we have no less than 85 new sets that will be released tomorrow.
|
Author: | BricksThatStick | Posted: | May 31, 2023 08:10 | Subject: | Re: Why no easy link from store to catalogue ? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog, daxio writes:
Because we don't want buyers to leave the store where they are shopping.
~Jen
|
Exactly.
IIRC that option to click the image to get the number to click on didnt used
to be there so it's better than nothing at all
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | May 31, 2023 07:46 | Subject: | Re: Why no easy link from store to catalogue ? | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, daxio writes:
Because we don't want buyers to leave the store where they are shopping.
~Jen
|
Author: | daxio | Posted: | May 31, 2023 07:16 | Subject: | Why no easy link from store to catalogue ? | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| As far as I can see the only way to look up the catalogue entry for a store product
is to click the image then the catalogue reference - it is not at all obvious,
I even forget from time to time.
https://store.bricklink.com/daxio?p=daxio&itemID=351965136#/shop
|
|
Author: | crocushorselady | Posted: | May 30, 2023 19:01 | Subject: | Re: pending additions for 2 weeks | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog Requests, kangootom writes:
| I made 9 additons for the Lego Friends set 41426. All counterparts with uploaded
images, because of stickers.
(e.g. 22886pb26)
They are now pending for 2 weeks, so I can't add them to the set inventory.
As these are my first entries, I was wondering if I missed a step for the approval
to go forward. Or there is simply nobody around with the same set for the approval?
Thanks
|
Hello,
Thanks for contributing! Catalog submissions are approved by our admin and they
only have so much time to go around. It is normal to wait several weeks at least
for stickered counterparts to be added. (Priority is given to new parts and sets,
understandably.) A quick search of the word 'sticker' in the log of pending
items returned about 400 results. So, I would be a bit patient here if I were
you.
I looked over your submissions and they look pretty good! There are a couple
things I would recommend just from my experience as a submitter:
1. Some of these parts are missing the word Pattern.
2. When possible, try to describe the colors accurately using LEGO colors as
your guide. For instance, you use the word Green several times. Is it Green,
Bright Green, or Lime? The admin are going to need to confirm.
3. The sticker on 87544pb100 is quite crooked. If it were me, I would carefully
remove, dust off, and reposition this one.
Good luck!
~Jen
|
Lol reading this I'm so surprised that my submissions took only 2 days (I
must have lucked out).
|
|
Author: | CykillsGarage | Posted: | May 30, 2023 17:48 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats! |
Author: | Reki_Lobsheek | Posted: | May 30, 2023 17:19 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats Jonas!
Erikk
|
|
Author: | Brickwilbo | Posted: | May 30, 2023 14:45 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congratulations.
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
|
|
Author: | clearingtoys | Posted: | May 30, 2023 14:33 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
AWESOME! Congrats Jonas! Good luck & stay strong!
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 30, 2023 14:09 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | | Don’t forget to celebrate with pizza!
|
If it's got ham & pineapple toppings on it
|
Pineapple? Pouaaah
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 30, 2023 13:15 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
Boom shaka laka!
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 30, 2023 13:13 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| Congrats!
Don’t forget to celebrate with pizza!
|
If it's got ham & pineapple toppings on it, mind your fingers! Chomp!
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | May 30, 2023 13:10 | Subject: | Re: P/N 30179 with yellow door tr-lt-blue glass | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| […]
It's in the inventory for this set.
Hope that explains things.
|
The subject is the counterpart / combo for {30179 + x39c01}. There’s several
30179cxx, but not with x39c01 in Yellow.
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | May 30, 2023 13:01 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| Congrats!
Don’t forget to celebrate with pizza!
|
If it's got ham & pineapple toppings on it, mind your fingers! Chomp!
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | May 30, 2023 13:01 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator.
|
Congratulations Jonas. I'm pretty sure you are very happy to have your inventory
privileges back, and I am happy for you. Enjoy it!
Diana
|
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | May 30, 2023 12:55 | Subject: | Re: P/N 30179 with yellow door tr-lt-blue glass | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Checking the various combinations of 30179, I’m not seeing the combo entry for
yellow door frame and trans-lt-blue glass. Does this exist and it is not connected
to 30179 in black ?
For reference, I’m parting out several copies of 6434-1 and all of them had the
same frame/door combo. The yellow door appears to be x39c01.
TIA
|
It's in the set's inventory:
Already exists:
* | | x39c01 Door 1 x 4 x 6 with 3 Panes and Square Handle with Fixed Trans-Light Blue Glass Parts: Door {Yellow} |
It's in the inventory for this set.
Hope that explains things.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
Author: | pcthurman | Posted: | May 30, 2023 12:46 | Subject: | Re: P/N 30179 with yellow door tr-lt-blue glass | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cosmicray writes:
| Checking the various combinations of 30179, I’m not seeing the combo entry for
yellow door frame and trans-lt-blue glass. Does this exist and it is not connected
to 30179 in black ?
For reference, I’m parting out several copies of 6434-1 and all of them had the
same frame/door combo. The yellow door appears to be x39c01.
TIA
|
You could add it to the catalog.
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 30, 2023 12:31 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congrats!
Don’t forget to celebrate with pizza!
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | May 30, 2023 12:00 | Subject: | P/N 30179 with yellow door tr-lt-blue glass | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Checking the various combinations of 30179, I’m not seeing the combo entry for
yellow door frame and trans-lt-blue glass. Does this exist and it is not connected
to 30179 in black ?
For reference, I’m parting out several copies of 6434-1 and all of them had the
same frame/door combo. The yellow door appears to be x39c01.
TIA
|
Author: | Emporiosa | Posted: | May 30, 2023 11:27 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
Congratulations Jonas! The BrickLink community is very lucky to you have you!
Thank-you for all of your hard work!
-Sarah
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 30, 2023 10:40 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| 100% deserved for Turez - and in general all the ones chosen to Catalog/Inventory
things - such a gigantic task! Thank you all!
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | May 30, 2023 09:02 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| They grow up so fast
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | May 30, 2023 08:16 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator.
|
Congrats Turez!
Keep on the good work
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 30, 2023 05:58 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congratulations Jonas! Thanks for your work done here |
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 30, 2023 05:57 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| 👍
👏👏👏👏
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
|
|
Author: | novabrick | Posted: | May 30, 2023 05:52 | Subject: | Re: We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Congratulations and Good Luck!
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | May 30, 2023 05:49 | Subject: | We have a new Catalog Administrator! | Viewed: | 256 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everyone,
As of today, we have promoted BrickLink member Turez (Jonas) from Catalog Associate
to Catalog Administrator. In practical terms, this means he will now have full
privileges on both sides of the catalog, governing both the entries themselves
and the inventory system which connects them:
https://www.bricklink.com/v3/member/community_experts.page
Jonas has done excellent work during this past year in his catalog-side-only
position, quickly masterning all the various functions in what has often been
called a "minefield" environment.
Of particular interest to him is the process of getting all the set entries added
to the database at the correct time (and with the correct details of course),
which involves staging them as pending items and doing research as to when each
set will be released:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogListOld.asp?itemPend=Y&catType=S
The scheduled release date is usually added to the item name on a pending entry.
As you can see, we are on the verge of a huge upload of new sets. June 1 is typcially
the single busiest release date besides January 1.
We are very pleased to have such great talent on our team. So join me in welcoming
Jonas to this new position!
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 29, 2023 13:48 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, here4bricks614 writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Sadly they are missing from my figures, need to replace them with correct colour.
|
Same, I’ve come across like 4-5 of them now but none have had the stud so I also
don’t know yet
|
They are Pearl Light Gray. That part never came in the unrecognized weird silver,
so no need to worry about alternates with these.
|
Perfect! Thanks for the heads up
|
|
Author: | here4bricks614 | Posted: | May 29, 2023 13:32 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Sadly they are missing from my figures, need to replace them with correct colour.
|
Same, I’ve come across like 4-5 of them now but none have had the stud so I also
don’t know yet
|
They are Pearl Light Gray. That part never came in the unrecognized weird silver,
so no need to worry about alternates with these.
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 29, 2023 13:20 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Sadly they are missing from my figures, need to replace them with correct colour.
|
Same, I’ve come across like 4-5 of them now but none have had the stud so I also
don’t know yet
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 29, 2023 11:03 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Sadly they are missing from my figures, need to replace them with correct colour.
Thanks for the info.
In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Meant to ask what colour the 4073’s ( on lightsaber handle ) are for these minifigures.
Light Grey ?
Light Blue Grey ?
Other ?
Thanks in advance
|
I believe they are Pearl Light Gray if I remember correctly. However, I could
be wrong as I do not own any of them.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 29, 2023 10:57 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Meant to ask what colour the 4073’s ( on lightsaber handle ) are for these minifigures.
Light Grey ?
Light Blue Grey ?
Other ?
Thanks in advance
|
I believe they are Pearl Light Gray if I remember correctly. However, I could
be wrong as I do not own any of them.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | May 29, 2023 10:06 | Subject: | Re: pending additions for 2 weeks | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, kangootom writes:
| I made 9 additons for the Lego Friends set 41426. All counterparts with uploaded
images, because of stickers.
(e.g. 22886pb26)
They are now pending for 2 weeks, so I can't add them to the set inventory.
As these are my first entries, I was wondering if I missed a step for the approval
to go forward. Or there is simply nobody around with the same set for the approval?
Thanks
|
Hello,
Thanks for contributing! Catalog submissions are approved by our admin and they
only have so much time to go around. It is normal to wait several weeks at least
for stickered counterparts to be added. (Priority is given to new parts and sets,
understandably.) A quick search of the word 'sticker' in the log of pending
items returned about 400 results. So, I would be a bit patient here if I were
you.
I looked over your submissions and they look pretty good! There are a couple
things I would recommend just from my experience as a submitter:
1. Some of these parts are missing the word Pattern.
2. When possible, try to describe the colors accurately using LEGO colors as
your guide. For instance, you use the word Green several times. Is it Green,
Bright Green, or Lime? The admin are going to need to confirm.
3. The sticker on 87544pb100 is quite crooked. If it were me, I would carefully
remove, dust off, and reposition this one.
Good luck!
~Jen
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 29, 2023 08:08 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Meant to ask what colour the 4073’s ( on lightsaber handle ) are for these minifigures.
Light Grey ?
Light Blue Grey ?
Other ?
Thanks in advance
In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| Cheers, images sent.
Stuart
In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| I have these if they are of any use, however I’ve no idea what number to submit
them as for components of sw0121 and sw0137.
|
Many thanks - could you please send the original image files to catalog@bricklink.com?
The upload through the forum makes them smaller than necessary, so it would be
nice to have larger images for the catalog entries.
It will likely take a while until we have time to proceed with this little project
(probably not before we are done with all the new summer sets and parts), but
in any case it is very helpful to have the images ready.
|
|
|
|
Author: | kangootom | Posted: | May 29, 2023 05:07 | Subject: | pending additions for 2 weeks | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I made 9 additons for the Lego Friends set 41426. All counterparts with uploaded
images, because of stickers.
(e.g. 22886pb26)
They are now pending for 2 weeks, so I can't add them to the set inventory.
As these are my first entries, I was wondering if I missed a step for the approval
to go forward. Or there is simply nobody around with the same set for the approval?
Thanks
|
Author: | Nicolasamico37 | Posted: | May 28, 2023 13:03 | Subject: | Re: add matching part | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, galeatter writes:
| please add the right side for matching part 50955pb051. Thank you.
|
Hi,
Parts in the catalog needs to be added by people who have them. These people
can take pictures and add them with the form "Add or change", add dimensions...
and finally add pictures.
But don't forget it could take time for the parts to be approved
Nicolas
|
Author: | galeatter | Posted: | May 28, 2023 12:56 | Subject: | add matching part | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| please add the right side for matching part 50955pb051. Thank you. |
Author: | rainbowmist | Posted: | May 27, 2023 18:54 | Subject: | Inventory Alternate for Set 410-1 | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi. I just received a whole bunch of older 1970s sets and was sorting thru the
parts and for set 410-1 there was a 3003px3 instead of 3003pb008. Thought it
would be interesting to have an alternate for set 410-1.
Thank you
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | May 26, 2023 00:47 | Subject: | Re: Deor Skin Tag Remover Reviews: Should You Buy | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| | “risk-fraud-alert-read-carefully”!! One would think that a scammer would read
their own links carefully before posting!
|
|
Well the same 14 people are reading this garbage. Now a 15th person is reading
this garbage and is about ready to go hunt down a forum post sanitizing app!
Screw these scammers I just ignore them.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 25, 2023 23:10 | Subject: | Re: Deor Skin Tag Remover Reviews: Should You Buy | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | “risk-fraud-alert-read-carefully”!! One would think that a scammer would read
their own links carefully before posting!
|
|
Author: | uticabrix | Posted: | May 25, 2023 09:16 | Subject: | Re: Duplo Monkey #4 missing? | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Inventories, uticabrix writes:
| This item was in BL about a week ago, now I can't seem to locate him. ID#6204691,
part#35676. Can anyone help?
|
|
Thank you!!
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 25, 2023 08:39 | Subject: | Re: Duplo Monkey #4 missing? | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Inventories, uticabrix writes:
| This item was in BL about a week ago, now I can't seem to locate him. ID#6204691,
part#35676. Can anyone help?
|
|
Author: | uticabrix | Posted: | May 25, 2023 07:26 | Subject: | Duplo Monkey #4 missing? | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| This item was in BL about a week ago, now I can't seem to locate him. ID#6204691,
part#35676. Can anyone help?
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 24, 2023 15:39 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In General, Nubs_Select writes:
| | Would you be able to provide an image of this figure and the other one without
the hair/hood, the 1x1 round plate and the lightsaber bar? That would help us
to finally add proper inventories for these figures.
|
i just got the obi-wan one in a lot and can provide more photos if needed
|
oh and for the dimensions should i remove the lightsaber or keep it on
|
I would say don't remove the lightsaber (i.e. the 4L bar), as the figure
came assembled with it when it was new and it could get lost more easily when
stored or shipped separately.
|
sounds good. ill work on it shortly
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 24, 2023 15:35 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| In General, Nubs_Select writes:
| | Would you be able to provide an image of this figure and the other one without
the hair/hood, the 1x1 round plate and the lightsaber bar? That would help us
to finally add proper inventories for these figures.
|
i just got the obi-wan one in a lot and can provide more photos if needed
|
oh and for the dimensions should i remove the lightsaber or keep it on
|
I would say don't remove the lightsaber (i.e. the 4L bar), as the figure
came assembled with it when it was new and it could get lost more easily when
stored or shipped separately.
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 24, 2023 15:23 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Cheers, images sent.
Stuart
In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| I have these if they are of any use, however I’ve no idea what number to submit
them as for components of sw0121 and sw0137.
|
Many thanks - could you please send the original image files to catalog@bricklink.com?
The upload through the forum makes them smaller than necessary, so it would be
nice to have larger images for the catalog entries.
It will likely take a while until we have time to proceed with this little project
(probably not before we are done with all the new summer sets and parts), but
in any case it is very helpful to have the images ready.
|
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 24, 2023 15:12 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| I have these if they are of any use, however I’ve no idea what number to submit
them as for components of sw0121 and sw0137.
|
Many thanks - could you please send the original image files to catalog@bricklink.com?
The upload through the forum makes them smaller than necessary, so it would be
nice to have larger images for the catalog entries.
It will likely take a while until we have time to proceed with this little project
(probably not before we are done with all the new summer sets and parts), but
in any case it is very helpful to have the images ready.
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 24, 2023 14:46 | Subject: | Re: Books Language | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Suggestions, crocushorselady writes:
| Would it be possible to sort the books section by language? So you could choose
to see only books in your language?
|
Look at the bottom of this page:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogTree.asp?itemType=B
|
Author: | crocushorselady | Posted: | May 24, 2023 14:43 | Subject: | Books Language | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Would it be possible to sort the books section by language? So you could choose
to see only books in your language?
|
|
Author: | par016 | Posted: | May 24, 2023 14:18 | Subject: | Re: Variant Star Wars figs have the rules changed | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, par016 writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, goldknight writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| With the recent addition of Commander Fox sw0202b, it has got many people in
the community questioning wether or not variant minifigs such as this should
be given an sw number on here?
Have the rules changed or been relaxed? Where will it end?
For the completionists it just makes collecting more challenging (& expensive)
& the worry will be it’ll put people off or they’ll give up altogether, as the
barrier to collect minifigs is already high with over 1300+ in the catalog.
For those wondering, I did own Fox, but sold it as it never had an sw number
& now I’m faced with a decision, do I fork out hundreds of pounds to get it (if
I can find one), or just sit with the knowledge of my collection never being
complete & quitting altogether?
|
The catalog is a fluid entity, and it ebbs and flows in many ways all of the
time. Some things get added (sw0202b), some get deleted, and some just get changed
(like five Star Wars "figures" that were just decommissioned [ https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=2571
]).
It was decided by the current catalog administration team as a whole that sw0202b
should get its own entry because it was made and distributed in sets in significant
quantities.
The Star Wars figure mentioned is no different than this Technic figure
that was printed incorrectly and distributed in sets in significant quantities.
That was just added to the catalog in December of last year.
As catalog administrators, we cannot play favorites and we try to apply guidelines
and decisions as consistently as possible.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Ok—I’ll say hi here
I am putting together info on sw0102–again as the admins have asked of me since
it was years ago when the full triangle of this minifigure helmet was misprinted
into many sets but never got it’s separate variant entry. It was I and a couple
others that tried to get this accomplished but without success. At present Sw0202
torso misprint was accepted really quick by the admins. Why? Just split the
sw0102 to add the variant correctly as sw0102a and sw0102b.
|
None of the current administrators were around for the old discussions or yet
understand the issue fully for sw0102. That is why we need the information.
We received all of the necessary information promptly when dealing with sw0202b,
and we were able to make a decision based on our collective prior experience
as an admin team dealing with similar scenarios (such as the Technic figure).
Once we feel like we have enough information, a decision will be made and acted
upon.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Any chance you could tell us what this "necessary information" that you
received on sw0202b was? I'd just be interested in knowing the backstory
on this figure.
Also what is the criteria that the decision is made on? What determines whether
you will add it to the catalog or not?
Thanks,
Pete
|
Just curious if any catalog admin is willing to answer this.
-Pete
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | May 24, 2023 13:35 | Subject: | Re: Paper bags inside sets from 2021 | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stellar writes:
3 years later, I have only seen paper bags once.
But the sets that I am opening and posting proof of change requests haven't
changed over to paper and won't for a long time.
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 24, 2023 12:59 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Thanks, didn’t think about that.
In Catalog Requests, Nubs_Select writes:
| In General, Stuart9 writes:
| I have these if they are of any use, however I’ve no idea what number to submit
them as for components of sw0121 and sw0137.
|
Nice! I’m replying to this under catalogue requests so hopefully an admin sees
it
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 24, 2023 12:52 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In General, Stuart9 writes:
| I have these if they are of any use, however I’ve no idea what number to submit
them as for components of sw0121 and sw0137.
|
Nice! I’m replying to this under catalogue requests so hopefully an admin sees
it
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 24, 2023 12:39 | Subject: | Re: Want a Star Wars watch? | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Sounds good! Glad it could get sorted out! And Thankyou for helping improve the
bricklink catalogue!
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 24, 2023 12:36 | Subject: | Re: Lightsaber minifigures | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I have these if they are of any use, however I’ve no idea what number to submit
them as for components of sw0121 and sw0137.
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | May 24, 2023 07:46 | Subject: | Re: Query: Duplicate item entries??? for set 6738 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Ladyandabrick writes:
| Hi
Just checking if these items are duplicated. Thank You.
42511pb32
42511c02pb32
|
Just so you know, it's easy to add the macros here that show the thumbnails
of the parts. And it could save you some time clipping screen shots.
~Jen
|
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 24, 2023 06:06 | Subject: | Re: Want a Star Wars watch? | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, popsicle writes:
| Got several of these ~ New
We'd like to get the item inventoried in the BL catalog. If someone is willing
to upload the inventory to the catalog for approval, we’ll send you a new set
(minus the minifig, which we've already submitted pending approval)
We’ll send you one at our expense in order to get it done. You keep the watch.
Let us know
~ConstrucToys
|
I think Ryan collects and have done some invs of these clocks:
https://www.bricklink.com/feedback.asp?u=ryanaitch
|
|
Author: | novabrick | Posted: | May 24, 2023 02:52 | Subject: | Re: Query: Duplicate item entries??? for set 6738 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| One is with wheels one is without.
So, it is alright like it is.
Christian
novabrick-team
In Catalog Requests, Ladyandabrick writes:
| Hi
Just checking if these items are duplicated. Thank You.
42511pb32
42511c02pb32
|
|
|
Author: | cycbuild | Posted: | May 24, 2023 00:05 | Subject: | Re: Want a Star Wars watch? | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Nubs_Select writes:
| Tempting offer. Depending on shipping times it might coincide when renovations
are done here and I should be able to get my light box to take photos plus I
got a USA address if you’d like I could take you up on that inventory offer
(although it would take close to a month ish before I could get around to it
so if someone else could do the process faster it may be optimal for them)
|
+1
I'd be happy to help Cory with that, but I've only submitted change requests
so I'd process it slower than others.
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 24, 2023 00:01 | Subject: | Re: Want a Star Wars watch? | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Tempting offer. Depending on shipping times it might coincide when renovations
are done here and I should be able to get my light box to take photos plus I
got a USA address if you’d like I could take you up on that inventory offer
(although it would take close to a month ish before I could get around to it
so if someone else could do the process faster it may be optimal for them)
|
|
Author: | cycbuild | Posted: | May 22, 2023 20:15 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| Dark Bluish Gray 4528776 1 (2008-2011)
Dark Bluish Gray 4626927 2 (2011-2012)
|
Without commentary, I'm not sure what you're trying to state here. Explanation
please.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
Sure,
Lego keeps track of parts being used in specific colors with Element IDs (Part
Color Codes). And sometimes update them with new numbers to float currently in-use
parts to the top of their filing system. Kinda like renaming an old Word document
to remind yourself that you're still working on it.
There used to be a naming convention for ID #s, but now (I think, 41XXXXX onwards)
they just go up in numerical order.
So,
Color - Element ID - Chronological Order (1,2,3...)
|
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | May 22, 2023 15:38 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
I'm seeing it come in Very Light Bluish Gray, did someone mistake it for
Light Bluish Gray, and add an incorrect color code for it, perhaps?
|
Dark Bluish Gray 4528776 1 (2008-2011)
Dark Bluish Gray 4626927 2 (2011-2012)
|
Without commentary, I'm not sure what you're trying to state here. Explanation
please.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 22, 2023 12:22 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
It has been fixed. Thanks for finding this error.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | cycbuild | Posted: | May 22, 2023 05:28 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
I'm seeing it come in Very Light Bluish Gray, did someone mistake it for
Light Bluish Gray, and add an incorrect color code for it, perhaps?
|
Dark Bluish Gray 4528776 1 (2008-2011)
Dark Bluish Gray 4626927 2 (2011-2012)
|
|
|
Author: | WOLKsite | Posted: | May 22, 2023 04:16 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, ghyde writes:
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
Further to this forum thread, I just checked Peeron and it does not list it as
coming in Very Light Bluish Gray, either.
My thoughts are that someone has incorrectly identified a color for this part,
and that changes need to be determined and made, as appropriate.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
It definitely comes in VLBG, since Thok (bio002) uses that.
|
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | May 22, 2023 03:10 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
Further to this forum thread, I just checked Peeron and it does not list it as
coming in Very Light Bluish Gray, either.
My thoughts are that someone has incorrectly identified a color for this part,
and that changes need to be determined and made, as appropriate.
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
Author: | ghyde | Posted: | May 22, 2023 03:05 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
I'm seeing it come in Very Light Bluish Gray, did someone mistake it for
Light Bluish Gray, and add an incorrect color code for it, perhaps?
Cheers ...
ghyde
|
|
Author: | WOLKsite | Posted: | May 22, 2023 02:33 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
Seems like it must be an error. Light Bluish Gray is not even listed as a known
color for this part.
|
True, not used in any sets. However... oddly there is a LEGO render of it on
the Color Images page?
|
|
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | May 22, 2023 01:38 | Subject: | Re: 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WOLKsite writes:
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
Seems like it must be an error. Light Bluish Gray is not even listed as a known
color for this part.
|
Author: | WOLKsite | Posted: | May 22, 2023 01:02 | Subject: | 4528776, Dark or Light Bluish Gray? | Viewed: | 111 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| PCC 4528776 (part 53989) is set as "Light Bluish Gray". However, LEGO's
database has it as Dark Stone Grey (Dark Bluish Gray). Is this an error? Or is
there some contradictory listing in an instruction manual?
|
Author: | iprice | Posted: | May 20, 2023 15:53 | Subject: | Re: Boba Fett Mech (August 1st release) | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, BricksOfFaith writes:
| When adding the inventory for the minifigure that is included on this yet-to-be-released
set, remember these details about the differences in the minifigures. This minifigure
(as far as I can tell) is a completely new Minifig with almost all new prints.
(Right minifigure is the unreleased one)
|
The helmet is different too.
|
Author: | BricksOfFaith | Posted: | May 20, 2023 15:49 | Subject: | Boba Fett Mech (August 1st release) | Viewed: | 85 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| When adding the inventory for the minifigure that is included on this yet-to-be-released
set, remember these details about the differences in the minifigures. This minifigure
(as far as I can tell) is a completely new Minifig with almost all new prints.
(Right minifigure is the unreleased one)
|
|
|
Author: | theboystoys | Posted: | May 20, 2023 08:33 | Subject: | Re: Part ID question | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| You may be correct. I know the visor was original to the set he bought.
Normally I wouldn’t care, but this one just rubbed me the wrong way for some
reason.
Thanks,
Matt
In Catalog, bricks2you writes:
| yours
his maybe
In Catalog, theboystoys writes:
| Are there variations on part 2447? Minifigure visor. I have a customer complaining
that I sent an old version with a set he bought, not the new version. As far
as I know there is only one version.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Here’s the pic he sent.
|
|
|
|
Author: | bricks2you | Posted: | May 20, 2023 08:25 | Subject: | Re: Part ID question | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| yours
his maybe
In Catalog, theboystoys writes:
| Are there variations on part 2447? Minifigure visor. I have a customer complaining
that I sent an old version with a set he bought, not the new version. As far
as I know there is only one version.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Here’s the pic he sent.
|
|
Author: | theboystoys | Posted: | May 20, 2023 08:16 | Subject: | Part ID question | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Are there variations on part 2447? Minifigure visor. I have a customer complaining
that I sent an old version with a set he bought, not the new version. As far
as I know there is only one version.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Here’s the pic he sent.
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 18, 2023 15:59 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 78 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I wondered if you spotted that, sadly I couldn’t edit.
In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| […]
There’s plenty here that make a fool of themselves in their native language.
|
You mean like writing “gauges” (gages) instead of “gouges”?
Fortunately, I mostly write in English here, so I’ve the excuse of being a foreigner
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | May 18, 2023 15:56 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stuart9 writes:
| […]
There’s plenty here that make a fool of themselves in their native language.
|
You mean like writing “gauges” (gages) instead of “gouges”?
Fortunately, I mostly write in English here, so I’ve the excuse of being a foreigner
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 18, 2023 15:36 | Subject: | Re: ATTN: BrickLink "Trans-Black" Color Change | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, cycbuild writes:
| […]
We never really get to see pure black and white. Interesting colors.
|
Or non-colour / all-colour
Yes, full of false friends. It’s rare but I’ve heard English-speaking people
say blanc (white) instead of noir for black
|
There’s plenty here that make a fool of themselves in their native language.
|
| […]
 to ASCII - Contient une séquence UTF-8 valide
|
Oops. I forgot it was the very up-to-date BL forum here
The text isn’t important, I put the links only for the colour patches
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|