Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | popsicle | Posted: | May 13, 2022 12:14 | Subject: | Re: Wow! It seems like just yesterday... | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Sadler_Bricks writes:
| A new brick would be interesting for the high end.
|
What Lego color for such a special brick designation, can you envision?
-Thanks
|
|
Author: | macebobo | Posted: | May 12, 2022 17:35 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, ryanaitch writes:
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
I had not heard about OLO, so a quick google found https://www.brickarchive.org/categories/2x4-bricks/production/olo/
|
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 12, 2022 16:51 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Definitely “OLO”.
In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| In Suggestions, ryanaitch writes:
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
Could be Minitalia:
https://us.v-cdn.net/5015319/uploads/FileUpload/cd/99e96151a4605d4429bc448a8ece65.jpg
|
|
|
Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | May 12, 2022 16:48 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, ryanaitch writes:
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
Could be Minitalia:
https://us.v-cdn.net/5015319/uploads/FileUpload/cd/99e96151a4605d4429bc448a8ece65.jpg
|
|
Author: | rylie_aitch | Posted: | May 12, 2022 16:02 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
Yellow brick looks like OLO, not a test brick but a very rare Japanese lego brick
(not sure of value because these come up so seldomly!). Red may be a normal slotted
brick, not necessarily rare (but I can't tell what the markings underneath
are). Green is definitely worth a bit
|
|
Author: | maxx3001 | Posted: | May 12, 2022 13:25 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
What a coincidence, you offered these on our local marketplace too!
|
Author: | Stuart9 | Posted: | May 12, 2022 10:14 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 63 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Definitely a market.
In Suggestions, Mesken writes:
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
|
Author: | Sadler_Bricks | Posted: | May 12, 2022 06:44 | Subject: | Re: Test bricks | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I believe there is a market for it. I have not dwelled too much of it these seem
to be the pat pend ones nice find.
Sadler_bricks
|
Author: | Mesken | Posted: | May 12, 2022 06:09 | Subject: | Test bricks | Viewed: | 193 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hello!
I've encountered a lot with (test?) bricks, is there a market for these kind
of bricks?
If so, what is the value of these bricks. I've included some pictures.
Thanks in advance!
|
|
Author: | Sadler_Bricks | Posted: | May 11, 2022 20:13 | Subject: | Re: Wow! It seems like just yesterday... | Viewed: | 74 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| A new brick would be interesting for the high end.
Sadler_bricks
|
Author: | ValpraX | Posted: | May 11, 2022 05:45 | Subject: | inventory and wanted list | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| like on inventory, where it shows (1) a small number next to the writing in the
items preview page, how about if i have 1 of that item in my brickstore it should
show a small (1) next to the word inventory adjacent to the wanted list?
|
|
Author: | hpoort | Posted: | May 9, 2022 02:08 | Subject: | Re: A place for Stud.io part requests... | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| In Suggestions, HGProductions writes:
| All that I am suggesting for this is that I think it would be nice if there
was a tab in Stud.io to request new parts to be added in upcoming updates. I
don't know how plausible or logical this request is, or if I just accidentally
suggested something that is way too big or hard to do.
Thanks,
HGProductions
|
You can do that in the Stud.io dedicated forum here: https://forum.bricklink.com/
|
To be slightly more specific, in the parts subforum:
https://forum.bricklink.com/viewforum.php?f=6
after you have read the Parts FAQ at:
https://forum.bricklink.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6368
|
|
Author: | Brickwilbo | Posted: | May 9, 2022 01:35 | Subject: | Re: A place for Stud.io part requests... | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, HGProductions writes:
| All that I am suggesting for this is that I think it would be nice if there
was a tab in Stud.io to request new parts to be added in upcoming updates. I
don't know how plausible or logical this request is, or if I just accidentally
suggested something that is way too big or hard to do.
Thanks,
HGProductions
|
You can do that in the Stud.io dedicated forum here: https://forum.bricklink.com/
|
|
Author: | HGProductions | Posted: | May 8, 2022 21:15 | Subject: | A place for Stud.io part requests... | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| All that I am suggesting for this is that I think it would be nice if there
was a tab in Stud.io to request new parts to be added in upcoming updates. I
don't know how plausible or logical this request is, or if I just accidentally
suggested something that is way too big or hard to do.
Thanks,
HGProductions
|
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | May 8, 2022 15:54 | Subject: | Re: Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| I'd like to see (knowing this will probably take some time!) the ability
for a wanted list to store multiple copies of the same model within the one wanted
list.
I have a bunch of rolling stock that are all copies of the same model. Rather
than having multiple wanted lists or a single wanted list with multiples of the
parts (e.g. 16 of a part for 4 copies of 4 parts each), it might be nicer to
manage as a bunch of copies of the same model within the wanted list.
This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go, but would allow me also to know when one copy is fully
ready to build even if I haven't got parts for *all* copies (so I can start
building that one while waiting for other orders to arrive).
Best regards,
-J
|
Perhaps I am not understanding, but using the "Quantity" button at the top of
the page, you can multiply a wanted list by a constant factor. That way, you
can maintain a single wanted list for multiple copies of an item. I often do
this when I am building multiple copies of the same MOC.
|
|
|
Author: | Greenbutterfly | Posted: | May 8, 2022 08:59 | Subject: | Re: Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Llewyn writes:
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go
|
I assume you're already aware, but you can run Buy All on multiple lists
- select it from one list, then on the results page check the others lists you
want and hit Apply to update the results.
To me, it seems that what you're suggesting would be way too niche to be
a worthwhile use of BL's limited development resource.
|
That works OK for me if your lists are significantly different. What I've
encountered with that mechanism trying to buy multiple copies of the one model
in the same purchase was that it didn't combine well and ended up only giving
me parts-to-purchase-count for one model, not all of them.
Now, that was a while ago when I used it and maybe it was broken at the time
I used it, but what I've done since is to buy one and then simply increase
the amounts in the cart based on the other lists and what's available and
needed... but it's a rather manual process that I'd prefer to avoid.
|
|
Author: | Sadler_Bricks | Posted: | May 8, 2022 05:30 | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Not that i have noticed vut would be a pretty nifty option.
Sadler_bricks
|
|
Author: | kzinti | Posted: | May 5, 2022 14:54 | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, mattkaupke writes:
| Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
As there is no BL message that accompanies it and I don't get a notification
in the page header, the only way I ever see them is if I happen to open whatever
page it is that finally shows the payment due notification. It's not a page
I open often - the profile maybe? I stumbled upon it this morning only to realize
I hadn't paid my April fees.
Why can't I set it to auto charge my Paypal account or credit card upon receipt
of the invoice? Or is there a way to do this? Or maybe at least to get a message
in BL messages when an invoice is issued so I get a flag on the header?
|
Not currently, but you could always pre-pay for a while. Figure your annual sales
charges and pay that much at the first billing. Should be running on credit until
end of the year.
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/mystore/fee.page
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 5, 2022 13:32 | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, mattkaupke writes:
| Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
|
You receive an e-mail.
You can set up your favorite Calendar app (Thunderbird here).
Or program your wife to take care of it
|
|
|
Author: | psusaxman2000 | Posted: | May 5, 2022 13:10 | Subject: | Re: Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, mattkaupke writes:
| Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
As there is no BL message that accompanies it and I don't get a notification
in the page header, the only way I ever see them is if I happen to open whatever
page it is that finally shows the payment due notification. It's not a page
I open often - the profile maybe? I stumbled upon it this morning only to realize
I hadn't paid my April fees.
Why can't I set it to auto charge my Paypal account or credit card upon receipt
of the invoice? Or is there a way to do this? Or maybe at least to get a message
in BL messages when an invoice is issued so I get a flag on the header?
|
I get an email every month when I have fees do with the subject "Your Bricklink
Invoice for ". Additionally when you go to your "My Store", there
is a big banner that shows up. Maybe you have a filter the is blocking the emails?
|
|
Author: | mattkaupke | Posted: | May 5, 2022 13:03 | Subject: | Is there a way to auto-pay monthly fees | Viewed: | 140 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Is there a setting that will auto-pay my monthly invoice when it is issued?
As there is no BL message that accompanies it and I don't get a notification
in the page header, the only way I ever see them is if I happen to open whatever
page it is that finally shows the payment due notification. It's not a page
I open often - the profile maybe? I stumbled upon it this morning only to realize
I hadn't paid my April fees.
Why can't I set it to auto charge my Paypal account or credit card upon receipt
of the invoice? Or is there a way to do this? Or maybe at least to get a message
in BL messages when an invoice is issued so I get a flag on the header?
|
|
Author: | tec | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 15:21 | Subject: | Re: Wantedlist size should be choosen by us | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| In Suggestions, tec writes:
| I suggest we will benefit from a simple settings which commands the on-screen
size (25,50 or 100,200) of our wanted lists.
Much like we have settings to control search results size (50,100,200...) in
current settings.
|
This?
|
YES but in settings https://www.bricklink.com/v2/settings/pref_settings.page
so we can assign a default size for ALL wantedlists we open everyday
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 09:44 | Subject: | Re: Wantedlist size should be choosen by us | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tec writes:
| I suggest we will benefit from a simple settings which commands the on-screen
size (25,50 or 100,200) of our wanted lists.
Much like we have settings to control search results size (50,100,200...) in
current settings.
|
This?
|
|
Author: | tec | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 09:27 | Subject: | Wantedlist size should be choosen by us | Viewed: | 85 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I suggest we will benefit from a simple settings which commands the on-screen
size (25,50 or 100,200) of our wanted lists.
Much like we have settings to control search results size (50,100,200...) in
current settings.
|
|
Author: | pollie1213 | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 05:34 | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| No, I do not agree.
What you describe below can be set on Paid payment status. If an order is PAID
you cannot add to it. Because we do this on Order status now, does not mean it
is the right way.
It is not that you cannot add to the order because the seller already packed
it, you cannot add to the order because the order is Paid for. (therefore the
block should be on payment status, not order status)
In a similar way, if you did not pay for the order, and payment status is pending,
but seller already Packed your order, you also cannot add to it. But now the
block is on the Order status.
In my opinion these are 2 different situations, where Bricklink now "misuses"
the order status for a payment status change.
In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | I as a seller find it extremly anoying that my order status is set to Paid, and
that I cannot set it to Pending or processing without switching all kind of order
status around.
Payment and Order status are 2 different things.
|
Yes but no...
If an Order is Paid it must be automatically Packed (or such closed status),
so the buyer cannot add to it, and the seller cannot remove items for example.
But if FULLY refunded, it should retrieve either Pending or such.
In short, payment and order status are linked somewhere.
It's more or less how it works right now.
|
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 09:09 | Subject: | Re: After posting feedback "Go Back" Button | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| Had no idea you posted about this till I randomly saw it on my activity page
yesterday. Still does not work in Chrome for me.
In Suggestions, Admin_Jaclyn writes:
| Hi randyipp,
Thanks for reporting this issue! I have marked this suggestion as implemented
since a fix was released this morning. Please let us know if you are still experiencing
a problem.
Thanks again!
-Jaclyn
BrickLink Admin Team
In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| Please fix this "go back" button to load the orders page not actually go back
a page. This requires me to hit refresh in order to see what order needs feedback
next. It's not an issue when there are only 1 or 2 but more than that and
it can get a little annoying.
This issue was observed on Chrome, it may react differently on other browsers,
if so I would love to hear about which ones if the button works!
Thanks!
|
|
|
Still does not work in IE11 either.
|
Also doesn't work in Edge.
Admins, please re-open this because whatever the fix was, it appears to be long
gone.
Best regards,
-J
|
Agreed! I've been working around it for so long, I think I would be confused
if it started working.
Jen
|
|
Author: | Llewyn | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 08:46 | Subject: | Re: Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Greenbutterfly writes:
| This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go
|
I assume you're already aware, but you can run Buy All on multiple lists
- select it from one list, then on the results page check the others lists you
want and hit Apply to update the results.
To me, it seems that what you're suggesting would be way too niche to be
a worthwhile use of BL's limited development resource.
|
|
Author: | Greenbutterfly | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 04:41 | Subject: | Multiple copies of a wanted list within a WL | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I'd like to see (knowing this will probably take some time!) the ability
for a wanted list to store multiple copies of the same model within the one wanted
list.
I have a bunch of rolling stock that are all copies of the same model. Rather
than having multiple wanted lists or a single wanted list with multiples of the
parts (e.g. 16 of a part for 4 copies of 4 parts each), it might be nicer to
manage as a bunch of copies of the same model within the wanted list.
This would still allow me to do "buy all" which would get all missing parts of
all copies in one go, but would allow me also to know when one copy is fully
ready to build even if I haven't got parts for *all* copies (so I can start
building that one while waiting for other orders to arrive).
Best regards,
-J
|
|
Author: | Greenbutterfly | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 04:33 | Subject: | Reset wanted list quantity to 0 | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I'd like the wanted list quantity that can be applied to be allowed to be
0.
I am in the process of building multiple copies of the same sets of rolling stock.
I have one wanted list of each from when I first uploaded them (to verify that
the build would work IRL) and now that I've done that I want to build 4 or
5 more of each.
I'm making each copy a separate wanted list for my own management (so once
I've got all the parts for one I can start building it while more parts arrive).
Rather than uploading from the studio file each time (which is a lengthy process
for some of these models due to their size), I thought I'd simply copy the
existing wanted list. However, they've all got the quantity set to full and
the mechanism to reset doesn't allow it to go to 0; the message says it must
be positive.
Thanks and best regards,
-J
|
|
Author: | Greenbutterfly | Posted: | Apr 29, 2022 04:28 | Subject: | Re: After posting feedback "Go Back" Button | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| Had no idea you posted about this till I randomly saw it on my activity page
yesterday. Still does not work in Chrome for me.
In Suggestions, Admin_Jaclyn writes:
| Hi randyipp,
Thanks for reporting this issue! I have marked this suggestion as implemented
since a fix was released this morning. Please let us know if you are still experiencing
a problem.
Thanks again!
-Jaclyn
BrickLink Admin Team
In Suggestions, randyipp writes:
| Please fix this "go back" button to load the orders page not actually go back
a page. This requires me to hit refresh in order to see what order needs feedback
next. It's not an issue when there are only 1 or 2 but more than that and
it can get a little annoying.
This issue was observed on Chrome, it may react differently on other browsers,
if so I would love to hear about which ones if the button works!
Thanks!
|
|
|
Still does not work in IE11 either.
|
Also doesn't work in Edge.
Admins, please re-open this because whatever the fix was, it appears to be long
gone.
Best regards,
-J
|
|
Author: | sydneybrickemp | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 20:17 | Subject: | New User Tutorial HELP HELP HELP | Viewed: | 104 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| The current New User Tutorial links to a VERY OLD uTube Video and was last updated
in 2013.
I‘m no content creator but surely someone within Bricklink can solve this dilemma.
The home page looks completely different now and it’s about time that the site
made things current and easy to follow for new users.
The best way to drive sales to the platform is through education. Introduce people
and teach them how to use it.
Win/Win sales generate fee revenue.
Just spent hours scouring uTube for Bricklink Tutorials and it’s a mess videos
are 10min to 40min in length.
Most tutorials are too long and/or become information overload.
The site needs a series of short, easy to follow video tutorials split into categories
for BUYERS and SELLERS example:
1. How to register an account (the number of people that can’t manage this simple
set would blow your mind, so many people get stuck and give up entirely and move
on to eBay or Brickowl)
2. How to navigate the site
3. How to create a wanted list
4. How to place an order
5. How to request a quote
6. How to request an invoice
Similar tutorials for sellers.
Please HELP - ANYONE?
Sydney Brick Emporium
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 11:22 | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| | I as a seller find it extremly anoying that my order status is set to Paid, and
that I cannot set it to Pending or processing without switching all kind of order
status around.
Payment and Order status are 2 different things.
|
Yes but no...
If an Order is Paid it must be automatically Packed (or such closed status),
so the buyer cannot add to it, and the seller cannot remove items for example.
But if FULLY refunded, it should retrieve either Pending or such.
In short, payment and order status are linked somewhere.
It's more or less how it works right now.
|
|
Author: | pollie1213 | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 10:54 | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| The problem is not that a Seller has too many statusses to choose from. The problem
is that a Payment status is used by BL within the Order status.
Order Status should be:
Pending
Processing
Processed or Packed
Shipped
Completed (if you like)
Returned
Cancelled
Payment status:
Pending
Sent
Paid or Payment received
Bounced
(Partially) Refunded
If the order was Paid through onsite Payment that should result in Paid in the
Payment Status.
Order status can then still be Pending, as I as a seller have not started processing
the order yet.
NSS should be based upon Payment status, not Order status.
I as a seller find it extremly anoying that my order status is set to Paid, and
that I cannot set it to Pending or processing without switching all kind of order
status around.
Payment and Order status are 2 different things.
In Suggestions, mbryson1 writes:
| From the perspective of a very new buyer, there are too many status options available
to sellers.
In my situation, I instantly paid for an order. After a week, the seller updated
the order status from "paid" to "processing." As a result, I am unable to submit
a NSS complaint until 1 week after the seller updated the order status, even
though there has been no material change and the only action to date is my payment.
(And yes, I did reach out to the seller, but never received a response).
There is still 1 more day before the 2nd week expires, and the seller will have
the opportunity to use another of the many status options available to delay
the NSS complaint another week. I imagine this could continue and prohibit me
from ever initiating the NSS process.
My suggestion is that BrickLink change this functionality so that once an order
is "paid" a seller cannot update the status to earlier in the timeline. The
only options available after "paid" should be "packed" and "shipped." There
should be no reason for an order to be "processing," which indicates the seller
is creating an invoice, after the order has been paid.
|
|
|
Author: | Rainbowuser | Posted: | Apr 26, 2022 10:44 | Subject: | Include part numbers on ITEM REMOVAL REQUESTS | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Would it be possible for item removal requests to have the part number listed
with the part to locate and insure correct part is being either deleted or adjusted
quantity......from the seller's perspective it would be helpful and should
only be a minor update I would think...thanks!
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 25, 2022 09:46 | Subject: | Re: suggest solution for counterpart of self | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| In Suggestions, tec writes:
I actually don't understand why the pulley, alone, would be listed as a counterpart.
The assembly is the counterpart.
|
Let’s look how it works for minifigure parts: the results is the set the part
appears in and the whole minifigure it appears in. So, you get the same set
twice, which skews the quantities¹, but at least you know that it came in a minifigure.
E.g.:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=2531&colorID=74&in=A
(¹ That part in Trans-Medium Blue is said to appear (“be known”) twice but there’s
actually only one in the set.)
There’s more and more big assemblies in Counterparts that are minifigs-but-not-minifigs
(so, not just wheel + tyre or part + sticker) and, IIUC, there’s a plan to harmonize
that (those assemblies and the minifigs). This suggestion would be a good step
toward that harmonization.
|
|
Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | Apr 25, 2022 08:51 | Subject: | Re: suggest solution for counterpart of self | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tec writes:
I actually don't understand why the pulley, alone, would be listed as a counterpart.
The assembly is the counterpart.
|
|
Author: | tec | Posted: | Apr 25, 2022 08:38 | Subject: | suggest solution for counterpart of self | Viewed: | 86 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| When searching for SOME color of parts, we often find things that are counterparts
of themselves, and not real other parts that can fit into the role.
look at that:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=4185&colorID=5&in=A
An experienced fellow told me it's because the part be inside an assembly.
I suggest this should be more clearly stated.
I suggest:
a) a new section at the end (e.g after "appears as regular" "appears as extra"
"appears as counterpart") named "APPEARS INSIDE ASSEMBLIES"
b) enrich the text, from "2 in 1234-1(inv)"
"2 as assembly 4158c01(inv) in 1234-1(inv)"
giving us a way to see the assembly, plus go into its contents.
|
|
Author: | benelson | Posted: | Apr 23, 2022 15:39 | Subject: | Re: Wanted List Sort Alphabetical & Filter/Search | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I think this is an older message, but I wanted to give it a thumbs up after finding
it recently, while searching how to set the default Wanted List order to alphabetical.
(Which doesn't seem like an option currently.) I'm relatively new to
Bricklink, and while many of its quirks are endearing, it's kind of maddening
to have to re-sort the main Wanted List page to alphabetical every single time
I toggle back and forth to it. In the way that I use my Wanted Lists, the date
created is pretty much irrelevant. Thanks!
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 11:13 | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, WildBricks writes:
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
Ha! I should have known that Nita Rae had already suggested it.
|
You meant of course the not as attractive or smart as her ~ popsicle
|
Author: | WildBricks | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 10:02 | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
Ha! I should have known that Nita Rae had already suggested it.
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 09:37 | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, WildBricks writes:
| With as many messages and questions as are flying across the forum, why hasn't
a VAT specific Topic Description been added?
|
Then you'll need a "Sales Tax" one also - but maybe it exists, didn't
check.
Otherwise simply a general "Taxes" one?
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 08:23 | Subject: | Re: Please add a Topic Description for VAT | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, WildBricks writes:
| With as many messages and questions as are flying across the forum, why hasn't
a VAT specific Topic Description been added?
|
A good idea https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1244764
|
Author: | WildBricks | Posted: | Apr 22, 2022 08:19 | Subject: | Please add a Topic Description for VAT | Viewed: | 141 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Implemented | |
| With as many messages and questions as are flying across the forum, why hasn't
a VAT specific Topic Description been added?
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | Apr 17, 2022 12:18 | Subject: | Re: Bricklink Discord | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, GuglMajo writes:
| In Suggestions, TwinSooBricks writes:
| I recently upgraded the discord channel to add a few new channels, were still
looking for members to make this server a success.
Please come on over and join us we don't bite.. hard
https://discord.gg/xhTDz3s
|
doesn't really work
|
https://discord.gg/WfuCBhPA
|
Author: | GuglMajo | Posted: | Apr 17, 2022 12:15 | Subject: | Re: Bricklink Discord | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, TwinSooBricks writes:
| I recently upgraded the discord channel to add a few new channels, were still
looking for members to make this server a success.
Please come on over and join us we don't bite.. hard
https://discord.gg/xhTDz3s
|
doesn't really work
|
|
Author: | Vosblokjes | Posted: | Apr 17, 2022 01:22 | Subject: | Re: Too many status options available to sellers | Viewed: | 81 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, mbryson1 writes:
| From the perspective of a very new buyer, there are too many status options available
to sellers.
In my situation, I instantly paid for an order. After a week, the seller updated
the order status from "paid" to "processing." As a result, I am unable to submit
a NSS complaint until 1 week after the seller updated the order status, even
though there has been no material change and the only action to date is my payment.
(And yes, I did reach out to the seller, but never received a response).
There is still 1 more day before the 2nd week expires, and the seller will have
the opportunity to use another of the many status options available to delay
the NSS complaint another week. I imagine this could continue and prohibit me
from ever initiating the NSS process.
My suggestion is that BrickLink change this functionality so that once an order
is "paid" a seller cannot update the status to earlier in the timeline. The
only options available after "paid" should be "packed" and "shipped." There
should be no reason for an order to be "processing," which indicates the seller
is creating an invoice, after the order has been paid.
|
Are you sure about this?
Help page says "At least 7 days have passed from the order submission date (since
the order was last submitted or updated)."
And altering a status is not the same as updating an order.
So I think you should still be able to file the NSS at this moment.
|
|
Author: | mbryson1 | Posted: | Apr 16, 2022 18:22 | Subject: | Too many status options available to sellers | Viewed: | 161 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| From the perspective of a very new buyer, there are too many status options available
to sellers.
In my situation, I instantly paid for an order. After a week, the seller updated
the order status from "paid" to "processing." As a result, I am unable to submit
a NSS complaint until 1 week after the seller updated the order status, even
though there has been no material change and the only action to date is my payment.
(And yes, I did reach out to the seller, but never received a response).
There is still 1 more day before the 2nd week expires, and the seller will have
the opportunity to use another of the many status options available to delay
the NSS complaint another week. I imagine this could continue and prohibit me
from ever initiating the NSS process.
My suggestion is that BrickLink change this functionality so that once an order
is "paid" a seller cannot update the status to earlier in the timeline. The
only options available after "paid" should be "packed" and "shipped." There
should be no reason for an order to be "processing," which indicates the seller
is creating an invoice, after the order has been paid.
|
|
Author: | JediMindbrix | Posted: | Apr 14, 2022 20:52 | Subject: | Display, filter and sort by locality / state | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Please make it easier to find local resellers by displaying the state abbreviation
in search results, and if possible add a search filter for states and provinces
of North America. For world wide, maybe add ability to sort by closest to your
post code. This would help on larger sets to reduce shipping costs and support
local businesses.
|
|
Author: | Rusky456 | Posted: | Apr 13, 2022 18:25 | Subject: | Re: Wanted list default options | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| In Suggestions, beaverbrick writes:
| In Suggestions, Rusky456 writes:
| Please, please, please give us an option to select a default "Sort By" in the
Wanted Lists.
My preference is "Alphabetical" and I note others have asked for this before.
The reverting to "Newest" every time you leave and return to the page is really
tiresome.
For such a useful and clever website I can't believe this is not a do-able
thing.
Does anybody read these ?
|
You can sort of do it...
Open your Wanted List.
Change the sort order.
Hit the Edit button (in the group of buttons next to search bar).
Then hit the Save button.
Note: this will change the sort order for all your Wanted Lists.
|
I think OP is talking about the order of the list of WLs, not the items
inside the WLs themselves.
|
Thanks beaverbrick , you taught me a new trick.
SylvainsLS is correct, I am referring to the order of the Wanted Lists themselves
I have about 150 incomplete sets as wanted lists- with names beginning with their
set numbers. So an alphabetical order is the easiest for me when jumping around
the list.
Thank you for your replies.
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 13, 2022 05:08 | Subject: | Re: Wanted list default options | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, beaverbrick writes:
| In Suggestions, Rusky456 writes:
| Please, please, please give us an option to select a default "Sort By" in the
Wanted Lists.
My preference is "Alphabetical" and I note others have asked for this before.
The reverting to "Newest" every time you leave and return to the page is really
tiresome.
For such a useful and clever website I can't believe this is not a do-able
thing.
Does anybody read these ?
|
You can sort of do it...
Open your Wanted List.
Change the sort order.
Hit the Edit button (in the group of buttons next to search bar).
Then hit the Save button.
Note: this will change the sort order for all your Wanted Lists.
|
I think OP is talking about the order of the list of WLs, not the items
inside the WLs themselves.
|
|
Author: | beaverbrick | Posted: | Apr 13, 2022 03:11 | Subject: | Re: Wanted list default options | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Rusky456 writes:
| Please, please, please give us an option to select a default "Sort By" in the
Wanted Lists.
My preference is "Alphabetical" and I note others have asked for this before.
The reverting to "Newest" every time you leave and return to the page is really
tiresome.
For such a useful and clever website I can't believe this is not a do-able
thing.
Does anybody read these ?
|
You can sort of do it...
Open your Wanted List.
Change the sort order.
Hit the Edit button (in the group of buttons next to search bar).
Then hit the Save button.
Note: this will change the sort order for all your Wanted Lists.
|
|
Author: | Rusky456 | Posted: | Apr 12, 2022 23:32 | Subject: | Wanted list default options | Viewed: | 74 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Please, please, please give us an option to select a default "Sort By" in the
Wanted Lists.
My preference is "Alphabetical" and I note others have asked for this before.
The reverting to "Newest" every time you leave and return to the page is really
tiresome.
For such a useful and clever website I can't believe this is not a do-able
thing.
Does anybody read these ?
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Apr 11, 2022 16:52 | Subject: | Re: dimensions of objects in brick size | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, thexfile writes:
| hi i came to this looking up this item :
|
| and i wanted to know if i could use it in a mock...
yet to my surprises there is no note to how tall or wide this thing is in plate
or bricks etc ....
|
It’s 5 plates high and almost a brick (= 3 plates) wide (so more than a stud
= 2.5 plates).
| it nicely says the actual size but that means nothing to me in my brick maths....
|
It’s packing dimensions, it’s useful for packing (the height includes the stud…
and a bit more).
Every part doesn’t have a dimension in studs.
And, generally, the complaints are about the stud dimensions:
— the third one is in bricks (so a 1x1 brick is 1x1x1, not 1x1x1.2),
— a DUPLO 2x4 brick and a LEGO 2x4 brick have the same dimensions: 2x4x1.
| it would be handy if such items would be expressed in ex : cylinder 1x1x2??
now im stuck guessing before i have it in hand...
i know its a pain to ad this after the fact but it would be handy to have this
info before i buy...
dont know if there are many of these items honestly its the first time im wondering
this after using brick link for years...
sorry if this subject already came up
|
|
|
Author: | wildchicken13 | Posted: | Apr 11, 2022 16:45 | Subject: | Re: dimensions of objects in brick size | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, thexfile writes:
| hi i came to this looking up this item : 93549pb02
and i wanted to know if i could use it in a mock...
yet to my surprises there is no note to how tall or wide this thing is in plate
or bricks etc ....
it nicely says the actual size but that means nothing to me in my brick maths....
it would be handy if such items would be expressed in ex : cylinder 1x1x2??
now im stuck guessing before i have it in hand...
i know its a pain to ad this after the fact but it would be handy to have this
info before i buy...
dont know if there are many of these items honestly its the first time im wondering
this after using brick link for years...
sorry if this subject already came up
|
Hint:
1 stud is approximately 5/16 inches (7.9375 mm)
1 plate is approximately 1/8 inches (3.175 mm)
1 brick is exactly 3 plates
Most parts on BrickLink are expressed in units of both inches/millimetres and
plates/studs. For example:
However, since this particular part is a minifigure utensil/accessory, it may
not have standard plate/stud dimensions. It appears to be about 2 bricks tall
and a little bit more than 1 stud in diameter. However, the only way to find
out for sure is to buy a couple, or ask someone who owns some if they can provide
more accurate dimensions.
HTH
|
|
Author: | thexfile | Posted: | Apr 11, 2022 16:36 | Subject: | dimensions of objects in brick size | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| hi i came to this looking up this item : 93549pb02
and i wanted to know if i could use it in a mock...
yet to my surprises there is no note to how tall or wide this thing is in plate
or bricks etc ....
it nicely says the actual size but that means nothing to me in my brick maths....
it would be handy if such items would be expressed in ex : cylinder 1x1x2??
now im stuck guessing before i have it in hand...
i know its a pain to ad this after the fact but it would be handy to have this
info before i buy...
dont know if there are many of these items honestly its the first time im wondering
this after using brick link for years...
sorry if this subject already came up
|
|
Author: | Dino | Posted: | Apr 7, 2022 18:45 | Subject: | Re: Separate buyer and seller addresses | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Poncke writes:
| In Suggestions, Dino1 writes:
| In Suggestions, Poncke writes:
| Please please separate buyer and seller addresses on a hybrid account.
Keep one main address set fixed on the account, but let sellers have the option
to use separate shipping addresses that do not have an impact on your store status.
I find it ridiculous that my store gets closed if I want to have something shipped
to another country.
Amazon, eBay, etc all have the option to change a shipping address.
Please implement this!
|
But you are aware that the seller loses his seller protection if the payment
is made via Paypal and the shipping address does not match the Paypal address?
With Stripe it should be the same.
|
Don't think this is true. You lose seller protection if you ship the order
to a different address than given to you in the transaction details.
I have a paypal account and many times have stuff shipped to my work address,
it is simply possible, and the seller doesnt lose seller protection.
The problem with statements like yours is that people take it for truth and then
vote against the suggestion.
It is still a problem that buyer and seller accounts are linked and my store
closes if I want to have something delivered to a different address.
It really is fecking madness. There is no other word for it. In fact, sellers
have missed out on sales, because of this limitation. Because I simply bought
the set elsewhere.
|
If you don't have a clue, you should shut up.
I don't know how Amazon does it, because I don't use it. As far as I
know they don't accept paypal.
If you buy something on Ebay, you can change the shipping address. However, only
on Ebay and not on Paypal. This dates back to when paypal was part of Ebay. Apparently
this rule was kept when Paypal was sold.
I don't really care what you do, but any seller should be warned if they
ship to an address other than the one on file with Paypal.
|
|
Author: | Poncke | Posted: | Apr 7, 2022 17:48 | Subject: | Re: Separate buyer and seller addresses | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Dino1 writes:
| In Suggestions, Poncke writes:
| Please please separate buyer and seller addresses on a hybrid account.
Keep one main address set fixed on the account, but let sellers have the option
to use separate shipping addresses that do not have an impact on your store status.
I find it ridiculous that my store gets closed if I want to have something shipped
to another country.
Amazon, eBay, etc all have the option to change a shipping address.
Please implement this!
|
But you are aware that the seller loses his seller protection if the payment
is made via Paypal and the shipping address does not match the Paypal address?
With Stripe it should be the same.
|
Don't think this is true. You lose seller protection if you ship the order
to a different address than given to you in the transaction details.
I have a paypal account and many times have stuff shipped to my work address,
it is simply possible, and the seller doesnt lose seller protection.
The problem with statements like yours is that people take it for truth and then
vote against the suggestion.
It is still a problem that buyer and seller accounts are linked and my store
closes if I want to have something delivered to a different address.
It really is fecking madness. There is no other word for it. In fact, sellers
have missed out on sales, because of this limitation. Because I simply bought
the set elsewhere.
|
|
Author: | donossi | Posted: | Apr 3, 2022 00:59 | Subject: | Number of orders at the Download side | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hello,
can you put numbers of the selected orders at the bottom of the "Order Download"
site.
Kind Regards
Maico
|
Author: | donossi | Posted: | Apr 3, 2022 00:56 | Subject: | Prefill Button for Date in "Download order" | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hello,
if i will download my orders, i must set the from and the to date.
Can you please put some prefill Buttons at the dates with "last month", "this
month", this year", "Last year". If enough space, this and last week is also
ok.
Kind regards
Maico
|
|
Author: | cosmicray | Posted: | Apr 1, 2022 10:12 | Subject: | Re: Items for sale - Seller Location | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, kzinti writes:
Or a geographical setting, 50 km/miles from me, same country, postal code,
| whatever. Narrow down the options a bit. I find myself wanting someone within
50 miles, because I know the post office MIGHT get things here quicker than say,
1,000 miles and thirteen Postal hops in between.
|
You dreamer.
Couple of weeks back I ordered some stamps by mail from USPS. They were sent
to me from Kansas City via Priority Mail, and dispatched on a Monday. I received
them on a Friday. That’s 4 days for USPS PM from Kansas to Florida. And this
was a small light baggy with two rolls of stamps in it. Go figure.
Nita Rae
|
|
Author: | hugibricks | Posted: | Apr 1, 2022 10:02 | Subject: | Re: Items for sale - Seller Location | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Yes sorry for any confusion, this is exactly what I'm referring too. It seems
like a simple setting to have.
In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| In Suggestions, hugibricks writes:
| Hello there.
I'd be shocked if this hasn't been requested. But why can't we have
a default setting for Items for Sale and set the seller location.
I'm not interested in "anywhere" and every time change this to my local region
australia. It's never not annoying to do this every time.
|
It already exists in the settings:
https://www.bricklink.com/priceGuideSettings.asp?viewFrom=P
|
That's only for the price guide, not for when you are searching for or raking
prices on an items page.
I think the question is why isn't there an option to set the default seller
location on item pages (for example, this one https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3001
) to be the buyer's country.
It has been asked for multiple times in the past but ignored.
|
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Mar 31, 2022 14:58 | Subject: | Re: Messages. | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Audioanemone writes:
| Who thinks bricklink should have a more advnaced messaging system?
Like messgae drafts because it is very frustrating when you acciedentally click
outside the message think or click backspacce it deletes ur whole message.
|
I think you might need a spell-checker too!
The only message system that works poorly is the one accessed through the storefront.
Use the old message system for better results. You can get there by clicking
on the little envelope on anyone's feedback card.
Good luck!
Jen
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Mar 31, 2022 13:57 | Subject: | Re: Messages. | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Audioanemone writes:
| Who thinks bricklink should have a more advnaced messaging system?
|
I guess everyone?
Except I prefer e-mail and reply (almost) only using e-mail.
| Like messgae drafts because it is very frustrating when you acciedentally click
outside the message think or click backspacce it deletes ur whole message.
|
For Firefox anyway there was an Add on that would memorise the form fields you
entered, and can fill them back after you used the history back, closed the page
- or simply want to retype the same thing...
|
|
Author: | Audioanemone | Posted: | Mar 31, 2022 12:33 | Subject: | Messages. | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Who thinks bricklink should have a more advnaced messaging system?
Like messgae drafts because it is very frustrating when you acciedentally click
outside the message think or click backspacce it deletes ur whole message.
|
|
Author: | popsicle | Posted: | Mar 30, 2022 13:19 | Subject: | Re: What do you think? | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Thanks for taking the time, Jeff.
Much appreciated input
-Cory
In Suggestions, kantorj writes:
| Replying to an old thread:
I LOVE the idea of a donations topic for the forum. I have a fair amount of
items in my store I could donate. Pieces that take up a lot of space, are older,
probably won't sell... this is a great idea.
If an Admin is listening- add my name to the list of supporters.
Jeff
In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| I’ve mentioned this before, but not as a site suggestion.
Add a Donation topic to the forum.
We’ve (my kids and I) have donated quite a few Lego items over the years, and
would like to choose a more specific topic when doing so here on BL. When I go
to give-away Lego, I’m compelled to use the contest mechanism in the forum, as
they’re is no other relative topics to just give away Lego.
Expand your thinking on this: It would not generate income for the site directly
(in fact can be viewed as pulling potential sellable inventory off the market)
but I think indirectly, the site revenue would increase.
In any case, wouldn’t it be fun? Add more excitement to the community? As well
as show the other relative sites, that we are more than about the $
-Cory, Jazz & Gavin
|
|
|
|
Author: | kantorj | Posted: | Mar 30, 2022 11:55 | Subject: | Re: What do you think? | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Replying to an old thread:
I LOVE the idea of a donations topic for the forum. I have a fair amount of
items in my store I could donate. Pieces that take up a lot of space, are older,
probably won't sell... this is a great idea.
If an Admin is listening- add my name to the list of supporters.
Jeff
In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| I’ve mentioned this before, but not as a site suggestion.
Add a Donation topic to the forum.
We’ve (my kids and I) have donated quite a few Lego items over the years, and
would like to choose a more specific topic when doing so here on BL. When I go
to give-away Lego, I’m compelled to use the contest mechanism in the forum, as
they’re is no other relative topics to just give away Lego.
Expand your thinking on this: It would not generate income for the site directly
(in fact can be viewed as pulling potential sellable inventory off the market)
but I think indirectly, the site revenue would increase.
In any case, wouldn’t it be fun? Add more excitement to the community? As well
as show the other relative sites, that we are more than about the $
-Cory, Jazz & Gavin
|
|
|
Author: | CapemHamSolo | Posted: | Mar 29, 2022 05:41 | Subject: | Re: Change order status to Completed | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, CapemHamSolo writes:
| In Suggestions, TakeAbricK writes:
| In my opinion the only one that knows if an order is 100% completed is the Buyer,
not the Seller. Only the buyer can change status to received, but both buyer
and seller can change status to completed.
Status Received:
Package has been received but the buyer has not yet verified the contents on
the package.
As a buyer I Always use this, until I verified the contents, which can take a
while, depending on how many orders I receive at once, how big the orders are
and if I can find time to check.
I like it to have this great reminder to do so:
... Orders received, change status when completed
Now I experienced several times, that the seller changed status to completed.
Which is not correct, because I still didn't check the order yet. Besides
I now lost my reminder which tells me I still have to verify this order and leave
feedback.
As a seller I understand that it's nice to know when an order is completed
and that buyer's do change order status, but it's not up to the seller
to decide if an order is received and 100% correct.
My Suggestion:
Only allow the Buyer to change status to Completed.
Diana
|
Late to the party but had a seller do this to me when I had a large number of
orders with various statuses. Seems status cannot be changed after a certain
period of time so by that logic a seller could set an order to completed and
if you do not realise and change it back in time it could get locked like that
despite never being received. Thankfully I was able to identify and change the
status back to shipped after reviewing a bunch of orders.
I use the statuses to mark off orders received and know which I am still waiting
for to arrive. Definitely if after a reasonable amount of time a buyer has not
updated the status but has not indicated the order was not received then the
status should automatically be set to completed and/or allow the seller to do
so. At the very least a seller should not be allowed to set it to completed after
1 day of marking it as shipped for an international order over a weekend! This
is what happened to me and it really annoyed me to the point I left neutral feedback
(was debating leaving negative as it was seemingly marked completed on a Sunday
after being shipped on the Saturday).
|
Just to add, it was a relatively expensive order too and has shaken my trust
in the seller and BrickLink processes in general.
|
|
Author: | CapemHamSolo | Posted: | Mar 29, 2022 05:38 | Subject: | Re: Change order status to Completed | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, TakeAbricK writes:
| In my opinion the only one that knows if an order is 100% completed is the Buyer,
not the Seller. Only the buyer can change status to received, but both buyer
and seller can change status to completed.
Status Received:
Package has been received but the buyer has not yet verified the contents on
the package.
As a buyer I Always use this, until I verified the contents, which can take a
while, depending on how many orders I receive at once, how big the orders are
and if I can find time to check.
I like it to have this great reminder to do so:
... Orders received, change status when completed
Now I experienced several times, that the seller changed status to completed.
Which is not correct, because I still didn't check the order yet. Besides
I now lost my reminder which tells me I still have to verify this order and leave
feedback.
As a seller I understand that it's nice to know when an order is completed
and that buyer's do change order status, but it's not up to the seller
to decide if an order is received and 100% correct.
My Suggestion:
Only allow the Buyer to change status to Completed.
Diana
|
Late to the party but had a seller do this to me when I had a large number of
orders with various statuses. Seems status cannot be changed after a certain
period of time so by that logic a seller could set an order to completed and
if you do not realise and change it back in time it could get locked like that
despite never being received. Thankfully I was able to identify and change the
status back to shipped after reviewing a bunch of orders.
I use the statuses to mark off orders received and know which I am still waiting
for to arrive. Definitely if after a reasonable amount of time a buyer has not
updated the status but has not indicated the order was not received then the
status should automatically be set to completed and/or allow the seller to do
so. At the very least a seller should not be allowed to set it to completed after
1 day of marking it as shipped for an international order over a weekend! This
is what happened to me and it really annoyed me to the point I left neutral feedback
(was debating leaving negative as it was seemingly marked completed on a Sunday
after being shipped on the Saturday).
|
|
Author: | kzinti | Posted: | Mar 24, 2022 17:02 | Subject: | Re: Items for sale - Seller Location | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| In Suggestions, hugibricks writes:
| Hello there.
I'd be shocked if this hasn't been requested. But why can't we have
a default setting for Items for Sale and set the seller location.
I'm not interested in "anywhere" and every time change this to my local region
australia. It's never not annoying to do this every time.
|
It already exists in the settings:
https://www.bricklink.com/priceGuideSettings.asp?viewFrom=P
|
That's only for the price guide, not for when you are searching for or raking
prices on an items page.
I think the question is why isn't there an option to set the default seller
location on item pages (for example, this one https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3001
) to be the buyer's country.
It has been asked for multiple times in the past but ignored.
|
Or a geographical setting, 50 km/miles from me, same country, postal code,
whatever. Narrow down the options a bit. I find myself wanting someone within
50 miles, because I know the post office MIGHT get things here quicker than say,
1,000 miles and thirteen Postal hops in between.
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Mar 24, 2022 04:50 | Subject: | Re: Items for sale - Seller Location | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Brickwilbo writes:
| In Suggestions, hugibricks writes:
| Hello there.
I'd be shocked if this hasn't been requested. But why can't we have
a default setting for Items for Sale and set the seller location.
I'm not interested in "anywhere" and every time change this to my local region
australia. It's never not annoying to do this every time.
|
It already exists in the settings:
https://www.bricklink.com/priceGuideSettings.asp?viewFrom=P
|
That's only for the price guide, not for when you are searching for or raking
prices on an items page.
I think the question is why isn't there an option to set the default seller
location on item pages (for example, this one https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3001
) to be the buyer's country.
It has been asked for multiple times in the past but ignored.
|
|
Author: | Brickwilbo | Posted: | Mar 24, 2022 04:12 | Subject: | Re: Items for sale - Seller Location | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, hugibricks writes:
| Hello there.
I'd be shocked if this hasn't been requested. But why can't we have
a default setting for Items for Sale and set the seller location.
I'm not interested in "anywhere" and every time change this to my local region
australia. It's never not annoying to do this every time.
|
It already exists in the settings:
https://www.bricklink.com/priceGuideSettings.asp?viewFrom=P
|
Author: | hugibricks | Posted: | Mar 24, 2022 03:51 | Subject: | Items for sale - Seller Location | Viewed: | 107 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hello there.
I'd be shocked if this hasn't been requested. But why can't we have
a default setting for Items for Sale and set the seller location.
I'm not interested in "anywhere" and every time change this to my local region
australia. It's never not annoying to do this every time.
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Mar 22, 2022 10:41 | Subject: | Re: Coupons | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, crimson30 writes:
| Any chance on improving the interface when it comes to coupons? Not only are
there regular forum questions on how to use them, I miss using them all the time
because of how the dropdown is not visible without me scrolling down on the Payment
page (and why would I even scroll down on that page?).
Why not streamline it like on Amazon? Make it automatic, but visible in the
checkout calculation on the right-hand side so that if you *don't* want to
use the coupon for whatever reason, it will be obvious that one is being applied.
|
Make it CLEAR, BIG and AUTOMATIC, yes.
80% of my Coupons simply expire.
I personnaly lost 100€ or more in Coupons from others I never used for this reason.
It's stupid coupons are at the last page, small, and inactive by default.
It should be on top right:
Items: 100€
Shipping: 5€
Coupon: -2€
Total: 103€
There should be a way to change this, or pick another coupon of course.
But activated by default, clearly, bold!
|
|
Author: | crimson30 | Posted: | Mar 22, 2022 09:53 | Subject: | Coupons | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Any chance on improving the interface when it comes to coupons? Not only are
there regular forum questions on how to use them, I miss using them all the time
because of how the dropdown is not visible without me scrolling down on the Payment
page (and why would I even scroll down on that page?).
Why not streamline it like on Amazon? Make it automatic, but visible in the
checkout calculation on the right-hand side so that if you *don't* want to
use the coupon for whatever reason, it will be obvious that one is being applied.
|
Author: | infiniter | Posted: | Mar 21, 2022 07:42 | Subject: | Re: Store search settings in cookie | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I meant "Ships from" - "Sellers location" |
Author: | infiniter | Posted: | Mar 21, 2022 07:41 | Subject: | Store search settings in cookie | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| I know there are global search settings, but they're only a few. I'm
in Germany and usually want to find parts from sellers in Germany, because of
shipping time and shipping costs.
So, by now, I have to activate "Ships from: Germany" every time I do a search.
Every time!
That is so annoying. My suggestion is: either make this a global search setting
or store my last settings in a cookie so that I don't have to select this
every time.
Thank you!
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 22:18 | Subject: | Re: Please bring back the pop up price guide | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| | Check your inventory settings (My Store Settings Management - scroll down):
|
Impressive how BL developped it so fast!!
|
|
Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 22:13 | Subject: | Re: Please bring back the pop up price guide | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Mortimer writes:
| Hi everybody,
When adding parts manually from my Inventory (no part out), I used to adjust
quantity and pricing by quickly checking the Price Guide.
When I say quick, I mean I just clicked on the "Price" link and a pop up window
opened instantly, showing the Price Guide for that part. Then I closed the window
and adjusted my price. This was a 2 seconds procedure. I used that procedure
for several colors of the same part without leaving the page. Then I submitted
all these changes in one go. Nice and fast!
Today, for an unknown reason, the same link leads to another page showing the
complete Price Guide with all items for sale. This takes a loooong time to load.
For the most common parts, it can take up to 20 seconds to load!!! Yes, I might
have an old computer. But still.
Then, I have to come back to the previous Inventory page, which can take time
to load and at the top of the said page. Then I have to scroll down to find and
adjust the right color entry. That's for one color. If I have five entries
of the same part in various colors to adjust, I must repeat that process accordingly.
This is really time consuming (x10 at least), annoying, frustrating and painful.
I know there are other ways to adjust prices, but that's the way I used to
work for years and it was so easy. I can't think of any quicker way.
Please, just bring back the small pop up window... Please?
Thaks for reading my rant.
Frédéric
|
Check your inventory settings (My Store Settings Management - scroll down):
|
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 22:07 | Subject: | Re: Please bring back the pop up price guide | Viewed: | 79 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| I can't believe sellers do this on BrickLink pages in 2022.
I started with early BrickStore in uhhh 2006 and never quit.
You simply can't imagine how life is easier, and FREE and open-source, and
economic (server friendly - cached), etc.
Hoping it helps?
Sylvain
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 17:48 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, gunga writes:
| Hi Jen,
My question/issue is how to tell if a stickered part had been submitted to be
added to the set inventory as a counterpart - not as a new entry in the catalog.
Every few months I go through those parts that people have added but then neglected
to add those parts to their respective sets. Basically get them out of no mans
land.
So, in the past I added a whole bunch to one of the mobile technic cranes, must've
been about 2 dozen. All were not in the counterpart section of the set. But
someone had beat me to it but there was no way to tell that until I hit submit.
And unfortunately it doesn't flag every part that has already been submitted.
It's one at a time. So you have to delete it, resubmit. Then repeat for
all submitted parts. I think I spent over an hour on that one set - if I recall
it had identical stickers on different parts so I had to go through the instructions
page by page trying to find the correct quantity of each stickered part. It
was tedious but eventually all for naught.
The link Paul supplied will definitely help in the future.
Bill
|
Ah, makes sense. It's really nice of you to do that. I've also added
orphaned parts occasionally if they have been laying around for a month or two.
'Fill in missing information' is a good place to waste an hour or two
if anyone is bored.
I spend so much time on the Approval Pending Overview that I take it for granted.
I don't do much of any catalog work without checking there first. I wish
they would fix the navigation tools there. It's a mess.
Jen
|
|
Author: | gunga | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 17:06 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Hi Jen,
My question/issue is how to tell if a stickered part had been submitted to be
added to the set inventory as a counterpart - not as a new entry in the catalog.
Every few months I go through those parts that people have added but then neglected
to add those parts to their respective sets. Basically get them out of no mans
land.
So, in the past I added a whole bunch to one of the mobile technic cranes, must've
been about 2 dozen. All were not in the counterpart section of the set. But
someone had beat me to it but there was no way to tell that until I hit submit.
And unfortunately it doesn't flag every part that has already been submitted.
It's one at a time. So you have to delete it, resubmit. Then repeat for
all submitted parts. I think I spent over an hour on that one set - if I recall
it had identical stickers on different parts so I had to go through the instructions
page by page trying to find the correct quantity of each stickered part. It
was tedious but eventually all for naught.
The link Paul supplied will definitely help in the future.
Bill
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 09:36 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, paulvdb writes:
| In Suggestions, jennnifer writes:
| In Suggestions, gunga writes:
Incredibly frustrating as the time I used, which can be
| significant, turned out to be wasted. And you don't find out until the very
last step - at submission. And it doesn't flag all the pieces - only the
first one it finds in the list that had been already submitted. So you can have
20+ parts and it turns out only 1 or 2 haven't been submitted. Good luck
finding out which ones quickly.
|
Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but when you submit a part with a number already
in use, you get a ready banner saying that item is pending. It does NOT mean
that the exact item you are submitting is pending, only that the number is already
in use. All you have to do is increase the sequential number until your submission
goes through.
Jen
|
The post was not about adding new stickered counterparts to the catalog. It was
about stickered counterparts that are already in the catalog but have not yet
been added to inventories. Either because the change request is still pending
or because one had not yet been submitted.
|
Hmmm.. I guess I have always just compared the list of stickers already listed
in the set inventory with the ones that appear on a search. Annoying, yes, but
much less difficult then resubmitting all the parts just to see if they are there.
Jen
|
|
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 09:13 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, jennnifer writes:
| In Suggestions, gunga writes:
Incredibly frustrating as the time I used, which can be
| significant, turned out to be wasted. And you don't find out until the very
last step - at submission. And it doesn't flag all the pieces - only the
first one it finds in the list that had been already submitted. So you can have
20+ parts and it turns out only 1 or 2 haven't been submitted. Good luck
finding out which ones quickly.
|
Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but when you submit a part with a number already
in use, you get a ready banner saying that item is pending. It does NOT mean
that the exact item you are submitting is pending, only that the number is already
in use. All you have to do is increase the sequential number until your submission
goes through.
Jen
|
The post was not about adding new stickered counterparts to the catalog. It was
about stickered counterparts that are already in the catalog but have not yet
been added to inventories. Either because the change request is still pending
or because one had not yet been submitted.
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 09:09 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, gunga writes:
Incredibly frustrating as the time I used, which can be
| significant, turned out to be wasted. And you don't find out until the very
last step - at submission. And it doesn't flag all the pieces - only the
first one it finds in the list that had been already submitted. So you can have
20+ parts and it turns out only 1 or 2 haven't been submitted. Good luck
finding out which ones quickly.
|
Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but when you submit a part with a number already
in use, you get a ready banner saying that item is pending. It does NOT mean
that the exact item you are submitting is pending, only that the number is already
in use. All you have to do is increase the sequential number until your submission
goes through.
Jen
|
|
Author: | gunga | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 09:04 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| Many thanks, Paul! |
|
Author: | paulvdb | Posted: | Mar 14, 2022 00:22 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, gunga writes:
| One of things I like to do from time to time is to assign those decorated parts
that have been added to the catalog but not added as counterparts to their appropriate
set.
For example:
It was added Dec 8,2021 but it is currently not listed in 75308's inventory.
So an Inventory Change request would need to be made to list it as a counterpart
(I have since submitted the request). Now this is the easiest example as that
is the ONLY stickered piece in the set. Some sets have dozens that need to be
added. I have submitted requests for such sets only to find out someone else
had beaten me to it. Incredibly frustrating as the time I used, which can be
significant, turned out to be wasted. And you don't find out until the very
last step - at submission. And it doesn't flag all the pieces - only the
first one it finds in the list that had been already submitted. So you can have
20+ parts and it turns out only 1 or 2 haven't been submitted. Good luck
finding out which ones quickly.
What I would suggest is something similar to when someone has reserved a set
to inventory. You immediately know if a set has been reserved as it states on
its catalog page under 'Item Consists Of', 'Inventory in Progress'
or something similar. So is there a way to tag or reserve those parts that have
been submitted waiting for approval to their appropriate sets so that when you
go to its catalog page you can see a message like 'Pending Approval'
under 'Item Appears In'?
I know adding stickered counterparts is way down on the list for catalog priorities
so adding such a feature could save lots of duplicate work/time from submitters.
Especially since there is an apparent backlog of stickered counterparts waiting
to be approved.
Of course, if such a thing already exists, could someone point it out to me?
Bill
|
You can find this through the pending approval page. https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChangeItem.asp?viewStatus=0&itemType=S
Put the set number in the search box at the top of tha page (without the -1 suffix
or else it won't work). This will show all pending change requests for a
specific set.
|
|
Author: | Hexy | Posted: | Mar 13, 2022 19:01 | Subject: | Re: Parts without homes | Viewed: | 58 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| | What I would suggest is something similar to when someone has reserved a set
to inventory. You immediately know if a set has been reserved as it states on
its catalog page under 'Item Consists Of', 'Inventory in Progress'
or something similar. So is there a way to tag or reserve those parts that have
been submitted waiting for approval to their appropriate sets so that when you
go to its catalog page you can see a message like 'Pending Approval'
under 'Item Appears In'?
|
+1. Although it has never happened to me, I've always imagined adding stickered
counterparts for a set, but then finding all my hard work with naming, measuring,
photographing etc. has gone to waste and could have been spent elsewhere.
If this was implemented, it would also make the admin's jobs easier to approve
stickered counterparts, as they would know what set they come from (assuming
you have reserved it)
- Theo
|
|
Author: | gunga | Posted: | Mar 13, 2022 14:51 | Subject: | Parts without homes | Viewed: | 185 times | Topic: | Suggestions | Status: | Open | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| One of things I like to do from time to time is to assign those decorated parts
that have been added to the catalog but not added as counterparts to their appropriate
set.
For example:
It was added Dec 8,2021 but it is currently not listed in 75308's inventory.
So an Inventory Change request would need to be made to list it as a counterpart
(I have since submitted the request). Now this is the easiest example as that
is the ONLY stickered piece in the set. Some sets have dozens that need to be
added. I have submitted requests for such sets only to find out someone else
had beaten me to it. Incredibly frustrating as the time I used, which can be
significant, turned out to be wasted. And you don't find out until the very
last step - at submission. And it doesn't flag all the pieces - only the
first one it finds in the list that had been already submitted. So you can have
20+ parts and it turns out only 1 or 2 haven't been submitted. Good luck
finding out which ones quickly.
What I would suggest is something similar to when someone has reserved a set
to inventory. You immediately know if a set has been reserved as it states on
its catalog page under 'Item Consists Of', 'Inventory in Progress'
or something similar. So is there a way to tag or reserve those parts that have
been submitted waiting for approval to their appropriate sets so that when you
go to its catalog page you can see a message like 'Pending Approval'
under 'Item Appears In'?
I know adding stickered counterparts is way down on the list for catalog priorities
so adding such a feature could save lots of duplicate work/time from submitters.
Especially since there is an apparent backlog of stickered counterparts waiting
to be approved.
Of course, if such a thing already exists, could someone point it out to me?
Bill
|
|
Author: | peregrinator | Posted: | Mar 12, 2022 09:18 | Subject: | Re: Improve all user experience | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Wishfour writes:
| It's not in TLG's interests to undermine the seller base of Bricklink
|
Consider that this is exactly why TLG hasn't opened a "Bricks & Pieces" store
on BrickLink.
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Mar 12, 2022 09:12 | Subject: | Re: Improve all user experience | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, Wishfour writes:
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | 3. It's still not possible to order Bricks and Pieces from Bricklink. This
is such an obvious thing to do that it shouldn't need to be said.
|
The day lego starts selling here, competing with sellers that pay fees to sell
here, is the day brickowl gets a sudden increase in seller numbers.
|
Buying from TLG is something that can already be done. This change would simply
improve the buying experience.
|
It would also manipulate the prices here, and LEGO said they would not do that
when they bought Bricklink.
|
|
Author: | Wishfour | Posted: | Mar 12, 2022 06:41 | Subject: | Re: Improve all user experience | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | 3. It's still not possible to order Bricks and Pieces from Bricklink. This
is such an obvious thing to do that it shouldn't need to be said.
|
The day lego starts selling here, competing with sellers that pay fees to sell
here, is the day brickowl gets a sudden increase in seller numbers.
|
Buying from TLG is something that can already be done. This change would simply
improve the buying experience. It's not in TLG's interests to undermine
the seller base of Bricklink, and the idea that sellers would migrate to Brickowl
doesn't make sense; it wouldn't achieve anything from the sellers'
perspective.
|
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | Mar 11, 2022 13:02 | Subject: | Re: Search Wanted Lists | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, lcgs13 writes:
| In Suggestions, lcgs13 writes:
| Hi, I love BrickLink!!!
As a user I would like to be able to sort the results of a search in my wanted
lists by
- List Name
- List completion
List completion should apeear in front of list name.
Thank you all!
|
Is there a way to get feedback on this sugestion?
|
I'd say: forget it.
Just download BrickStore, it's FREE and OPEN-SOURCE.
It can do (almost) whatever you wish, especially this.
|
Author: | lcgs13 | Posted: | Mar 11, 2022 12:55 | Subject: | Re: Search Wanted Lists | Viewed: | 25 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, lcgs13 writes:
| Hi, I love BrickLink!!!
As a user I would like to be able to sort the results of a search in my wanted
lists by
- List Name
- List completion
List completion should apeear in front of list name.
Thank you all!
|
Is there a way to get feedback on this sugestion?
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Mar 8, 2022 03:27 | Subject: | Re: SALES TAX - Canadian sellers | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, randyf writes:
| USE Tax, not USED.
|
Oopsies… but it’s been assembled!
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Mar 8, 2022 02:59 | Subject: | Re: SALES TAX - Canadian sellers | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| USE Tax, not USED.
In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| In Suggestions, leopard37 writes:
| […]
Saskatchewan law is the best. Residence if buying goods from outside of the province
are supposed to voluntarily pay the tax they should have been charged to the
province.
|
It’s supposed to work that way in the USA too: some states call it Used tax.
You buy in your state: you pay Sales tax to the seller. You buy from another
state: you report and pay Used tax on your own.
Thing is, no one did it and big internet sellers, 1. have their HQ in tax-friendly
states, and, 2. put their warehouses just over the state border for those states
that were a bit more clever and phrased their tax law to account for warehouses
and not HQs.
(It’s the same for import VAT: if you should have paid and didn’t and Customs
didn’t spot it, you are supposed to declare on your own.)
| That's some gutsy law writing.
|
I’d have said naive… but English is not my first language
|
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Mar 8, 2022 01:20 | Subject: | Re: SALES TAX - Canadian sellers | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, leopard37 writes:
| […]
Saskatchewan law is the best. Residence if buying goods from outside of the province
are supposed to voluntarily pay the tax they should have been charged to the
province.
|
It’s supposed to work that way in the USA too: some states call it Used tax.
You buy in your state: you pay Sales tax to the seller. You buy from another
state: you report and pay Used tax on your own.
Thing is, no one did it and big internet sellers, 1. have their HQ in tax-friendly
states, and, 2. put their warehouses just over the state border for those states
that were a bit more clever and phrased their tax law to account for warehouses
and not HQs.
(It’s the same for import VAT: if you should have paid and didn’t and Customs
didn’t spot it, you are supposed to declare on your own.)
| That's some gutsy law writing.
|
I’d have said naive… but English is not my first language
|
|
Author: | leopard37 | Posted: | Mar 7, 2022 22:29 | Subject: | Re: SALES TAX - Canadian sellers | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, jbroman writes:
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| Is there such a “marketplace law” in Canada yet?
|
Three provinces already have a marketplace law: Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
BC will have one effective 1 July 2022.
That’s four out of nine provinces (Alberta doesn’t have a PST).
|
Links? Or are you just talking about their tax laws. They don't call out
marketplace.
Saskatchewan law is the best. Residence if buying goods from outside of the province
are supposed to voluntarily pay the tax they should have been charged to the
province.
That's some gutsy law writing.
Tyson.
|
|
Author: | jbroman | Posted: | Mar 7, 2022 22:22 | Subject: | Re: SALES TAX - Canadian sellers | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| Is there such a “marketplace law” in Canada yet?
|
Three provinces already have a marketplace law: Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
BC will have one effective 1 July 2022.
That’s four out of nine provinces (Alberta doesn’t have a PST).
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Mar 7, 2022 19:14 | Subject: | Re: My inventory (non-seller) | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, i_r_on writes:
| In Suggestions, iprice writes:
| In Suggestions, antant7 writes:
| In Suggestions, stasher writes:
| Hello. This is my first post. Be patient with me.
I would like to be able to mark a set as in my inventory. I would like to mark
individual bricks as in my inventory. I would like to go to a random set and
then this site lets me know if I have enough pieces in my inventory to build
that set.
(this is implemented on Peeron but not here, from what I can see)
Thank you.
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think what you are describing is closer
to the functionality of rebrickable.
|
Brickset is closer to what the OP wants if I'm not mistaken, although Rebrickable
does offer some of the reuired features I don't think it enables you to store
your sets like Brickset (I most definitely could be wrong though).
|
I don't think anyone would want Brickset though, it's a site with tons
of advertisements and content taking only the 20/30% of the screen space... One
of the rare web sites that have ridiculous video ads too...
|
Yes, but all you have to do is log in and it all goes away.
Jen
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|