Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Brickitty | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 16:38 | Subject: | Re: Hose, Rigid 3mm D. length difference | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Brickitty writes:
| I just went through over 200 used and new parts from the category Hose, Rigid
3mm D. (75c03 up to 75c28), and I measured all of them with a ruler. I found
that, for both unconfirmed used hoses and confirmed new ones from sealed sets,
the actual length of the hoses in millimeters were shorter than the lengths listed
in the titles. Nearly every single hose was 0.2 to 0.3 millimeters shorter than
the "official" lengths listed on Bricklink. I confirmed this with other rulers.
Can anyone else confirm this? And if it's normal, perhaps the millimeter
lengths in the titles should be adjusted downward by 0.2mm to be more accurate,
or else changed to be a range, since the hoses often have minor length differences.
|
I'm sorry, those numbers should read either "2 to 3 millimeters" or "0.2
to 0.3 centimeters." My bad.
|
|
Author: | Brickitty | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 16:36 | Subject: | Hose, Rigid 3mm D. length difference | Viewed: | 92 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| I just went through over 200 used and new parts from the category Hose, Rigid
3mm D. (75c03 up to 75c28), and I measured all of them with a ruler. I found
that, for both unconfirmed used hoses and confirmed new ones from sealed sets,
the actual length of the hoses in millimeters were shorter than the lengths listed
in the titles. Nearly every single hose was 0.2 to 0.3 millimeters shorter than
the "official" lengths listed on Bricklink. I confirmed this with other rulers.
Can anyone else confirm this? And if it's normal, perhaps the millimeter
lengths in the titles should be adjusted downward by 0.2mm to be more accurate,
or else changed to be a range, since the hoses often have minor length differences.
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 12:19 | Subject: | Re: Key chain 853992 | Viewed: | 57 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
|
BrickLink ID CardAdmin_Russell
|
Location: USA, California |
Member Since |
Contact |
Type |
Status |
May 9, 2017 |
|
Admin |
|
|
BrickLink Administrator |
|
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| I just noticed this key chain in the catalog.
The current name is " 2 x 4 Brick - Satin Black Key Chain".
Should that not be "2 x 4 Brick - Chrome Black Key Chain"?
Or am I mistaken here?
|
To be honest, I have no idea.
When submitting the new key chains, I just tried to follow what was said here:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=265187&nID=1186400
There isn't any other part in Satin Black in the catalog yet and I don't
own that Chrome Black Darth Vader to compare the colors.
|
The interesting thing about that post is that those are actually NOT what I would
consider to be in the same category as the new Satin colors. I know I said that
at the time, but since then, I have acquired that hair piece, and I would actually
describe that as Opal, not Satin, because of the iridescent qualities. The whole
spectrum of color can be seen as the surface is turned, whereas with the satin
colors, it is merely a shift.
|
|
Author: | Cob | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 09:30 | Subject: | Re: Chrome silver Roborider wheels | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Searching, Schredder writes:
| Hi all,
yesterday i recovered my roborider wheel collection from early this century and
decided to sell it.
In the meantime i know about the metallic gold ones (from e. g. promo pack 800010,
see also my store).
What i am still interested in are 2 chrome silver chainsaw wheels (part 32362).
Does anyone know, if these were official parts or just a misprint?
They do not look like some just painted a normal one.
Best regards,
Manfred
|
There was a shop who would chrome parts, maybe it is a custom chrome job.
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 08:34 | Subject: | Re: Key chain 853992 | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| I just noticed this key chain in the catalog.
The current name is " 2 x 4 Brick - Satin Black Key Chain".
Should that not be "2 x 4 Brick - Chrome Black Key Chain"?
Or am I mistaken here?
|
To be honest, I have no idea.
When submitting the new key chains, I just tried to follow what was said here:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=265187&nID=1186400
There isn't any other part in Satin Black in the catalog yet and I don't
own that Chrome Black Darth Vader to compare the colors.
|
Chrome black is also this container on the outside
look at the note
I think this brick is chrome black
|
You are probably right. I think I was confused by that other discussion where
nobody mentioned that the black brick might be chrome and not satin/opal/whatever.
Request submitted.
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 08:03 | Subject: | Re: Key chain 853992 | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| I just noticed this key chain in the catalog.
The current name is " 2 x 4 Brick - Satin Black Key Chain".
Should that not be "2 x 4 Brick - Chrome Black Key Chain"?
Or am I mistaken here?
|
To be honest, I have no idea.
When submitting the new key chains, I just tried to follow what was said here:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=265187&nID=1186400
There isn't any other part in Satin Black in the catalog yet and I don't
own that Chrome Black Darth Vader to compare the colors.
|
Chrome black is also this container on the outside
look at the note
I think this brick is chrome black
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 07:20 | Subject: | Re: Key chain 853992 | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| I just noticed this key chain in the catalog.
The current name is " 2 x 4 Brick - Satin Black Key Chain".
Should that not be "2 x 4 Brick - Chrome Black Key Chain"?
Or am I mistaken here?
|
To be honest, I have no idea.
When submitting the new key chains, I just tried to follow what was said here:
https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=265187&nID=1186400
There isn't any other part in Satin Black in the catalog yet and I don't
own that Chrome Black Darth Vader to compare the colors.
|
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 05:45 | Subject: | Key chain 853992 | Viewed: | 69 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| I just noticed this key chain in the catalog.
The current name is " 2 x 4 Brick - Satin Black Key Chain".
Should that not be "2 x 4 Brick - Chrome Black Key Chain"?
Or am I mistaken here?
|
|
Author: | Schredder | Posted: | Jul 14, 2020 03:13 | Subject: | Chrome silver Roborider wheels | Viewed: | 96 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi all,
yesterday i recovered my roborider wheel collection from early this century and
decided to sell it.
In the meantime i know about the metallic gold ones (from e. g. promo pack 800010,
see also my store).
What i am still interested in are 2 chrome silver chainsaw wheels (part 32362).
Does anyone know, if these were official parts or just a misprint?
They do not look like some just painted a normal one.
Best regards,
Manfred
|
|
|
Author: | Primicia | Posted: | Jul 13, 2020 17:20 | Subject: | Re: 973pb0303 torso in yellow? | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, LegoMath writes:
| In Catalog, Primicia writes:
| Hi
I just found this minifigure.
But I can only find 973pb0303 in orange.
So how can I add this color?
|
Is this what you are looking for?
|
Thanks!
|
Author: | Primicia | Posted: | Jul 13, 2020 17:20 | Subject: | Re: 973pb0303 torso in yellow? | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Cob writes:
| In Catalog, Primicia writes:
| Hi
I just found this minifigure.
But I can only find 973pb0303 in orange.
So how can I add this color?
|
|
Thanks!
|
Author: | Cob | Posted: | Jul 13, 2020 14:53 | Subject: | Re: 973pb0303 torso in yellow? | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Primicia writes:
| Hi
I just found this minifigure.
But I can only find 973pb0303 in orange.
So how can I add this color?
|
|
Author: | FantasyBricks | Posted: | Jul 13, 2020 14:52 | Subject: | Re: 973pb0303 torso in yellow? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Primicia writes:
| Hi
I just found this minifigure.
But I can only find 973pb0303 in orange.
So how can I add this color?
|
Is this what you are looking for?
|
Author: | Primicia | Posted: | Jul 13, 2020 14:45 | Subject: | 973pb0303 torso in yellow? | Viewed: | 119 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi
I just found this minifigure.
But I can only find 973pb0303 in orange.
So how can I add this color?
|
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 17:13 | Subject: | Re: 75939 | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Soviet writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, skikyssing writes:
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
Could someone do something about it?
|
I bought the other sets to inventory them, but at the time this one was reserved
by someone else. It isn't clear now whether they decided not to do it or
their reservation just timed out. I don't remember who it was.
|
They have communicated that they are not going to do the inventory. I will free
it up for you.
|
I'm sorry if I seemed to imply it, but I am not planning to do the set at
this time. I have all I need on my plate at the moment.
|
Alright, I'll do it. I recently got the parting-out ich and it looks pretty
interesting.
|
Excellent. I WILL want to get some of those baby Dinos at some point, but I
think I can wait for clearance.
|
|
Author: | Soviet | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 16:11 | Subject: | Re: 75939 | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, skikyssing writes:
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
Could someone do something about it?
|
I bought the other sets to inventory them, but at the time this one was reserved
by someone else. It isn't clear now whether they decided not to do it or
their reservation just timed out. I don't remember who it was.
|
They have communicated that they are not going to do the inventory. I will free
it up for you.
|
I'm sorry if I seemed to imply it, but I am not planning to do the set at
this time. I have all I need on my plate at the moment.
|
Alright, I'll do it. I recently got the parting-out ich and it looks pretty
interesting.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 16:04 | Subject: | Re: 75939 | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, skikyssing writes:
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
Could someone do something about it?
|
I bought the other sets to inventory them, but at the time this one was reserved
by someone else. It isn't clear now whether they decided not to do it or
their reservation just timed out. I don't remember who it was.
|
They have communicated that they are not going to do the inventory. I will free
it up for you.
|
I'm sorry if I seemed to imply it, but I am not planning to do the set at
this time. I have all I need on my plate at the moment.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 14:55 | Subject: | Re: 75939 | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, skikyssing writes:
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
Could someone do something about it?
|
I bought the other sets to inventory them, but at the time this one was reserved
by someone else. It isn't clear now whether they decided not to do it or
their reservation just timed out. I don't remember who it was.
|
They have communicated that they are not going to do the inventory. I will free
it up for you.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 11:23 | Subject: | Re: 75939 | Viewed: | 54 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, skikyssing writes:
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
Could someone do something about it?
|
I bought the other sets to inventory them, but at the time this one was reserved
by someone else. It isn't clear now whether they decided not to do it or
their reservation just timed out. I don't remember who it was.
|
|
Author: | jennnifer | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 10:05 | Subject: | Re: 75939 | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, skikyssing writes:
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
|
BrickLink inventories are and have always been submitted by BrickLink members.
| I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
|
I seriously doubt LEGO is generating wealth from this little site.
| Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
|
We have always had volunteer Admins who do an amazing job.
| Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
|
Because the job would be too big and too expensive. Our data is crowd sourced
because that system is efficient and effective.
| Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
|
BrickLink does.
|
Could someone do something about it?
|
Yes! You can! That's what's so great. Feel free to submit the inventory,
people here on the forum will answer any questions you have, and our awesome
admins will help you along. You will be parting out your set in no time.
Sorry if I sound harsh, but your post is very harsh and negative. You have been
a member here for 5 years and have never noticed who creates our catalog?
Good luck,
Jen
|
|
Author: | skikyssing | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 09:41 | Subject: | 75939 | Viewed: | 106 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
The inventory of the 75939 has been added on june first. but we can not still
part out the set.
I guess Lego do not care about getting fees from Bricklink...
Lego should hire someone who can be responsable for inventories.
Why do we have to make the job of Bricklink and Lego?
Bricklink and Lego should give reward for the people who take their extra time
to register all the sets...
Could someone do something about it?
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 02:31 | Subject: | Re: With and without groove in one set | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| All of them are with groove. I made a change request as you asked.
In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| OK, thanks to you all. So if I read it right, I should submit two red 44301a
as regular and two red 44301b as alternate and delete the two red 44301?
|
Yes, that is correct.
Could you also check and change the undetermined black hinge plates in the set?
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 00:31 | Subject: | Re: How to combine parts into a new c01 entry? | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| I assume you are being facetious, but yeah. I would add them as counterparts
in the set also. I think it is an item that people will be interested in buying
and they probably won’t want the tray or lid by itself. Commercially they are
best listed as a set.
Really hard to find right now since they are gear and are not in inventories.
|
When we're redoing the catalog guidelines we'll take this into consideration.
I'm not opposed to these entries on principle, just for the potential they
introduce. But again, we'll consider it and have something solid in place
by the end of the year.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jul 11, 2020 22:26 | Subject: | Re: How to combine parts into a new c01 entry? | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| So no one would have to add lidded entries to hundreds of containers
|
Would I be accurate in assessing your comments to say that you support the addition
of combined tray/lid catalog entries for Dots sorting containers?
|
I assume you are being facetious, but yeah. I would add them as counterparts
in the set also. I think it is an item that people will be interested in buying
and they probably won’t want the tray or lid by itself. Commercially they are
best listed as a set.
Really hard to find right now since they are gear and are not in inventories.
|
|
Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jul 11, 2020 19:54 | Subject: | Re: How to combine parts into a new c01 entry? | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| So no one would have to add lidded entries to hundreds of containers
|
Would I be accurate in assessing your comments to say that you support the addition
of combined tray/lid catalog entries for Dots sorting containers?
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|