The only thing about this one is that I do not have the time to look through
all 555 sets that use 10247 to see if it ever "officially" mattered.
However, the question I keep coming back to is why redesign the part in the first
place if not to use that additional functionality? And I believe the answer is
somewhere in those 555 sets.
So in theory, if we can find 1 set that has a 1x2 jumper under the modern base
of 1 it should then mean it cant be merged if I'm understanding correctly?
Yes.
but then even if we dont find it and then a year later lego does do that it would
be something that has to be split again if I understand correctly?
Yes, again. This is one of the main reasons losing information that is already
here is not a good plan.
mhm. a functional difference like this is not a good idea to merge. I just tested
it out, out of curiosity with the parts on hand and it truly has no grip. it
just falls off as there was no stud. Thankyou for clarifying
[...] Yes. [...] Yes, again. This is one of the main reasons losing information that is already here is not a good plan. (4 hours ago, Jan 25, 2024, to Catalog)
655 Messages in this Thread. (Message tree supressed because there are more than 50 messages in this thread) show message tree